Sniperking
of reading
39
Read books
That's good to hear, thank you. I still believe they should have communicated and resolved their issues before you depicted them as all lovey-dovey. Rather than planning to address this in later chapters, an immediate explanation for this shift in attitude would have been more beneficial. However, you're the author, so whatever suits your narrative best. I'm just happy that you'll eventually address this issue.
" I thanked you for the correction; neither salty nor bothered." Your second response to my comment(which you deleted) was literally "crying wall of text", you can't expect me to believe that you thought that was a nice thing to say and that you weren't bothered, do you? and if so, why delete it then ? And your thanking me was after implying I was abnormal. Again you expect me to think it was genuine? Your second comment was juvenile and does not speak well of you, but at least you seemed to realize it enough to delete it before others saw it. "You did claim to know my thoughts, though; claiming I don't care is exactly that." Again, I did not claim anything. I said it was "like" you didn't care since wrote a bad synopsis which is really weird since it's the first thing new readers look at. As a reader, I have nothing else to go on except what you write. It's like seeing a badly edited novel and asking why doesn't the author care enough to check these things. You can argue that maybe it was too harsh and I can accept that. But your behaviour here is just not the way to approach things. "The review had nothing to do with the story. You mentioned only the synopsis.I was polite enough to thank you, focus on that next time." If you wanted to argue this point then this would have been sensible. If you believe I didn't read your story and the review was based solely on the synopsis then that's fine, and that was something we could have talked about. But don't act like you were polite and appreciative yet delete your comments and imply rude things at the same time. At that point, it's not even worth it and you just look bad.
I didn't and do not claim to know anything about you. Your synopsis was written badly and I wanted you to see it and improve it. If anything, your indirectly calling me an abnormal person is a lot stronger than what I said. I don't know how to comment on the main page without leaving a rating, and that rating was given after reading your story, although not all of it which is why I mentioned I hadn't read enough of it. Everybody makes mistakes, take constructive criticism about things that are actually bad and make your story better. Don't get unnecessarily salty about it unless you're actually abused. You're the one who benefits from every revision and correction your story gets.
that would be great
In the beginning, she did not know why he was cold to her, she later remembers that she did something really bad to him.
Still very confused about them, maybe I missed a chapter where they talked about everything. I mean normally shouldn't he still be upset about what happened in the past (which hasn't been fully revealed yet). And I thought she was going to apologize and they would have that conversation.
Like seriously? There's no conversation to resolve all the issues they had? It's like it never happened and we've skipped to them being lovey-dovey?
Very confused. I thought she did something in the past and that was why he was cold. Did none of that happen?
He's justifying why he should be allowed to cry. As in he's a teleporter but he's also emotionally unstable right no
what exactly happened?
so she just forgot all this when they met again?
in shoulder-length (student), delete student
very confusing
remember she is a secret bodygaurd
remember she is a secret bodygaurd
I would like to know this song