Ranger_Hero587
of reading
876
Read books
Please be foreshadowing. Please be foreshadowing. Please be foreshadowing.
For those that don't know, caffeine does in-fact make spiders drunk.
More like a mule. Or perhaps a liger, if you don't want the metaphor to refer to either Vampires or Werewolves as donkeys.
Ah yes, the extremely deadly Purple Buggers. Used by assassins throughout the land.
Crepuscular: Resembling or relating to twilight. Additionally crepuscular animals are species that are most active during twilight hours.
That's species-specific.
You are absolutely correct, that being competent during both day & night is important. However, this skill shifts the balance much further to the former than he currently is the latter. IE MC currently has equal skill during the day as he does night (night vision gives him an advantage over others, not his daylight self), however, this skill will result in his abilities during the night being quarter those during the day.
Laplace's Demon. Well, Angel, in this case.
I mean Greatsword stances are a lot closer to Spear stances, than Longsword & One-handed sword stances. This is mainly due to proper Greatswords being too big, such that sword stances simply can't be used. Sword stances have moves where the blade is pointed towards the ground, & a Greatsword is going to hit the ground if you were to attempt them.
Yeah Terran sounds way better.
Window Shopping.
Spite: you won't find a better motivation.
IIRC it's his last name.
It is never true that animals will fight their perents for their position, they will instead leave the pack to find a mate, starting their own pack as a result. Very few species even have fights over who gets to lead. Male Lions will indeed fight for domenece of the harem, but only outsiders not children of the pride. Not to mention (as I implied) Lions adhere to a harem model, where the males will bread with a dozen, closely related, females. It is definitely true that you can find evidence of the Alpha/Beta model, but ask an expert that has spent a lot of time studying a given species, and they will be able to tell you why they don't adhere to the model completely. In some cases they will even tell you how your perceived evidence is born of a misconception (in the case of L. David Mech he just so happened to be the expert himself, trying to explain how his younger self was mistaken).
The Alpha/Beta model states the strong lead the weak, which is where the misconception lies. People assume that the leader is the strongest among the pack, when it is instead the oldest & most experienced. And as I stated in the previous comment, due to the familial nature of a pack, this basically ends up being the perents of most, if not all, the other pack members. Note the Alpha/Beta model instead states this position as often being fought for.
SPAAAAACE!!
Actually no, L. David Mech who first popularised the model in his book The Wolf, would latter regret ever publishing his work after reexamining the pack behaviour in wolves. He came to realise that, what he initially mistook for an Alpha/Beta dynamic, was, in fact, a familial one, thus pack would comprise of a pair of wolves & their offspring. However, when he tried to reveal his new findings in a follow-up book, he found he was too late. The populous had grown so attached to his initial interpretation, such that they even disregarded the words of the original publisher, believing them the words of a mindless hater.