Daoist216406
of reading
10
Read books
I didn't even read the deal this way I thought he was only allowed to take up to 10% of the whole not keep ten percent of what he did take
or had one of the tenses needs to be changed
number seems wrong. isn't one of their mech worth 200-400m so that would only be a few mechs. probably meant 1t
not everyone has to orient the same way just flip upside down and it won't matter how tall your target is
is this thought rather than speech?
remove the Im from improper or the not. it can't have both
that's the only way the economics could work otherwise someone will only need to sell Breakevenvolume = licencecost/.94/50m to be able to start undercutting then the degree of undercut increases the volume needed so unless the license cost is huge it won't work and at a minimum the Friday coalition and other interested parties will need to buy a copy so the FC will have no incentive not to crash the market price to hurt ves
did Juliet or ves say this?
selling the praying version of the sanctuary for an overpriced amount won't work if anyone else is able to buy a design licensed then undercut dramatically unless you can disallow license sales then only allow direct or agreed sales to keep prices high or if the MTA set the license cost very high which would feel a bit cheaty
the latter is the second one which would have the opposite meaning intended, should be former instead or the subject needs to be switched in the sentence structure
It's impossible to tell when he's thinking something, talking to himself or speaking to others and these two paragraphs really don't help. a simple "thought ves" or "said ves" or switching from " to ' would make a huge difference
unsure whether this is supposed to be proscribed or prescribed