TianGuez

This dude wants us to waste time for only find out, dude for a reason we ask

The truth is that I don't know about others, but most of the time I see these community problems arise when the author is open to doing either of the two, which leads to these two positions arguing or trying to influence each other. The problem, in my opinion, lies with the author, since they are the ones who open their product up for discussion when they are the ones who should ensure the type of product they want to write. As for the spoiler, whether it will be a harem or not, if the author already tells you that it won't be, it's the same type of spoiler that you get when you see the tags “tragedy” or “villain,” which in a way spoil the plot for you. I have also seen that people don't like it when the author is asked to clarify from the beginning whether it will be Harem or not, as we would be “reducing their creativity.” I'm sorry, brother, but that's the price you have to pay for publishing a work in progress. In my case, I don't like the harem genre at all. I avoid these works like the plague, since many of the authors are incapable of writing them coherently and they end up being NSFW works that really aren't my type of work. That's why when an author of a work I like is open to discussion about whether it will be harem, I at least try to send a comment asking them not to do so and give them my reasons.

No harem plis

I'll be honest with you, this is a very good fanfiction, but it has one of the worst upload schedules I've ever seen, and I have several doubts about the author, because all of their projects are abandoned at some point (even when they're really creative). I'm going to give the typical critique by sections: Writing quality: Since I use an automatic translator, I miss a lot of the grammar, but for the organization of the chapters and creativity in using different chapter formats, I have to give it a 10. Update stability: One of the most irregular I've seen. It pains me that this happens in a work that I'm so eager to continue reading and by an author who is so creative. Character design: I have to say that at first I had my doubts. I'm not the biggest fan of copying and pasting characters into different worlds, but honestly, the MC has some different characteristics than Marvel's Peter Parker, yet they maintain a general line that doesn't seem forced. He really enjoys being Spider-Man (although I would like to see some tragedy in the midst of his adventures to reinforce his character). As for the secondary characters, I can say that they feel alive. Each one has their own thing going on and they are even dimensional. I'll take the example of the supposed FMC: Zatara. With Peter, she is a cute bundle of youthful nerves, but with Peter's sister (W character), she is the Zatara we all know, the confident but good-natured one. World Design: New York has a lot of construction; it's a lively city where Spider-Man lives. Civilians live their lives independently of the MC but react to their peculiar neighbor. The only “bad” thing is that, since it's based on YJ, I don't think we'll see many adventures in NY. Please, author, I beg you to finish the work. Even if it takes five years, don't abandon it.

24 Harem? touch grass

My idea would be: Joker sees a broken Batman, realizing that it wasn't him who broke him but the architect, and thinks that someone other than Batman killed him, while Batman thinks he killed Joker and sees that killing him would have solved everything that happened, that people were always right. But the important thing its make the punishment of joker and batman at the same time or simultaneous, they are the eternal They represented the status quo of Gotham at its finest: Joker always causing chaos and Batman always stopping him but perpetuating the city's suffering.

Joker is not Batman's punishment, although I believe that the punishment for both should be the same and simultaneous. My idea would be: Joker sees a broken Batman, realizing that it wasn't him who broke him but the architect, and thinks that someone other than Batman killed him, while Batman thinks he killed Joker and sees that killing him would have solved everything that happened, that people were always right.

Bro, if you're reading a novel tagged as “villain” and after 100 chapters he stops being a villain and becomes a good-natured hero who saves everyone, wouldn't you complain? In the same way that there is no Harem tag, people read the work not looking to read one of the many trashy harem works that are now on the site. (It's one thing to react to a change in category in the middle of the work, and another to start reading a novel that is a harem and complain that it's a harem).

Easy, Fake Robin and recording the thing, make the world see the problem of Batman Moralily.

The problem, my friend, is that Batman is the best detective in the world. He knows how to separate his personal opinions about vigilantes from his detective work. He also knows how to recognize modus operandi, and what the Architect did with Alex Thorne's image can be understood in two ways: 1. Alex fits into his modus operandi, A.K.A. a criminal who has not been punished. 2. The Architect does have a fragile ego, as Alex said in his interview, because he broke his own modus operandi by trying to affect an innocent person. In the end, this discussion is unnecessary since it led to my third alternative in my original comment, which is that Batman discovered that the Architect used Alex's face as a trick to buy time for a more creative punishment.