Okay?…

That’s cause she is a child.

It’s nick, not the mc.

Onion.

I know a lot of people are finding issue with this ‘first moment’ thing but, it isn’t really all that wrong. It could just mean that the first moment he could, he adjusted himself. Last moment means that it was like, well, the last moment. If I stopped myself from bumping into someone it’s very likely that I’d fall to the ground or still clip them. But if I reacted at the first moment I could, it’s more likely that we’d both end up fine. If I’m honest, I honestly couldn’t say which one the author meant. But it is more likely that it has been mistranslated.

It’s not really rounding all that much if you look at it. One tone is equal to roughly 907kg So 0.1 ton is 90.7kg 90.7kg* 4 = 362.8kg 907kg + 362.8kg = 1,269.8kg The original weight was 1,263.9kg roughly, that’s only 5.9kg difference. To be honest, that’s hardly rounding at all when it comes to measurements that high that’s like a margin of less than 0.5%. Anyway, my math may be off especially that last percentage, I’ve been out of school for a while now. But yeah, hope that clears everything up for you. Peace.

Wait, are you on about the chapter or this dudes comment?

Okay, so what did they mean. ‘Cause after re-reading it, that’s still all I’m getting.

You just, quite literally, gave it a price. How is it priceless?

Wait, why would we need it to move consciousness? All we really need it to do is be able to replicate sensations, no? Putting someone to sleep is easy, it can be done medically or through other means that I don’t know about, I’m sure. From what I understand, we have already managed to turn memories into a physical thing, if only just, through reading and recording the electrical impulses in the brain whilst recalling said memory. It was first properly done with a sound, if memory serves me well. It’s still rudimentary, but it has been done. All that needs to be done for this technology to be used in full-dive, is for it to be developed a bit more, then reverse engineered so instead of reading these impulses, it creates them. And then developing a method the send those full impulses to the brain to allow us to experience them. It’s not close, but it’s also not too far away. It might even be possible in this decade. Though I find it more likely to appear in the next. I can hope though. I apologise if I am wildly wrong with this, but yeah, reading you comment made me think a little. Peace.

Cool, I knew about Voldemort, Snape and Harry. Didn’t know Dumbledore was though, huh cool. I should really get around to reading the books at some point, or at least watching the movies. Peace dude/dudette.

Ahhh! I see. My bad, even after reading your reply it took me a minute to get what you were saying. Righ right, I honestly can’t remember much about the character traits of people in this novel, it’s been a while. But you’re probably right, considering that she is a character who speaks in the third-person, you would be correct. I think what confused me was the lack of speech marks around what you said. But yeah. Peace dude/dudette.

Huh, indeed, I did not know about Oxford commas at that point in time. Cool, but it’s no suprise considering I failed all my english exams. Peace.

The sect had mainly women, so they lack “man” power but have an abundance of “woman” power.

It only looks messy when used in conjunction with stuff like kg. If my memory serves me well, Americans mainly use lbs, and if my memory isn’t being stupid, there are either 2,000lbs to the American ton or 2,500lbs. So it is a little cleaner that way. Peace.

Yeah, that sound about right. Infinity is a concept rather than an record of measure. But it is an interesting thing to think about, peace dude.

Going off of what I know, the universe can’t be infinite. Due to that fact the universe will one day reach a state of cold death, where all the energy is used up or whatever it is happens to cause a cold death. Anyway, due to that fact, it’s implausible for the universe to be infinite, because it would require infinite energy for such expansion, if that makes sense. Conceptually, the multiverse is infinite. But I’ve read many discrepancies in the way the theory of the multiverse is described, but, going off the ‘infinite parallel realities’ premise, then yeah, the multiverse would have to be infinite to accommodate it’s own infinity. Then what could be called big infinity would be, what I’ve taken to calling the ‘omniverse’ going off of the whole ‘uni’ meaning one, then ‘multi’ meaning multiple of a single. ’omni’ I’m using as all encompassing, or every multi, I haven’t really got a good way to describe it, but it makes sense in my head. Anyway, I don’t really remember what I was going for when I first started writing this comment, something about how infinity can’t really be used to describe size due to the fact that infinity isn’t technically a measurement because it is, in reality, just a concept. But yeah, I got distracted at some point whilst writing what I was writing and ended up with this… Anyway, peace dude.

No worries, but I guess I can understand that. Thanks for fixing it.

I like this version of hagrid.

See, this baffles me. I’ve though about it and come to realise, no matter where you are, math is the same, right? So why would anyone do a decimal like this? What kind of math were you learning to write small decimals like this?