Ruhlas

Although a tad bit unrealistic, given what the queen seems to know of him; but I cant say I dont like it :)

Do you know that thing about coincidents and novels? :D; so I would say, that the chances are high!

The feeling of embarrassment is a luxuriety. If she were an elder she would at least be able to not show it or have control over her feelings. I would rather argue that IF she is embarrased, then she might be thinking of certain actions related to something sexual, which would make her more of a "pedo" then the other Way around. Thats literally why you would feel embarrased. Also, as a person of such standing you would at the world more in terms of gain, not how you feel (which would probably get you killed very quickly). Realistically speaking she would not care less as long as she gains more than she looses; and the only thing she potentionally looses is a favor if she is kind and far less if she is not (could just give him some money to make them even). Why would she spare him another glance anyways? So no, it still does not make any sense at all! Even if we just consider these 2 arguments.

They seem to have spies and its not very realistic to assume that nobody would snitch :> although I do not know the context of my comment very well anymore therefore you might be right.

Yes, an elder that lived for god knows how long; either was never interested in sexual desires or already has PLENTY of experience. Lets also consider, that in her long life she most definitly has seen hundres if not thousands naked bodies and was most definitly seen naked by hundreds if not way more people as well. Why the heck would you even give a **** about if anybody is seeing you naked at all?? It doesnt make one bit of sense at all.

You are confusing the "logical thinking" part a little. I am also thinking logically, its just that my aim is different. Your aim is simply to survive, whereas my decission making includes for instance, if I would want to live a life full of guilt, and I simply would not; in that case I would rather die trying to search for a solution to ensure, that we both can live instead. That is a logical decission I make. Also, any decission a human makes consciously about the life of another is dependend on some set of "morals", or some sort of justification. In your case that would be survival intent. I do not know what decision I would make if I am placed in the scenarion that when I kill One I can safe a hundred. But if it's only the 2 of us that are involved, well than I would make this decission as I described with a very high probability. Don't get me wrong, I am not judging anything here; and I think you should not do so too. There is simply no "correct" answer to moral based questions.

cornhub haha ^.^

haha you are funny

riiigght a voice recorder so someone else can pick it up eventually ^^

Why are you so "*******" mad? I just pointed out the logical flaws of YOUR comment, which may have been inherited by the authors writing. Calm the "****" down dude.