seated*

the chapter is from Liam's view but this paragraph is talking about what the boy is doing. So the first "his" makes sense that it refers to Liam (since in the context the lad wouldn't be trying to look into his own eyes, so the lad wouldnt be an applicable noun for the pronoun to reference) but the next "he" is more ambiguous. The context only works if its refering to Liam, but in casual english the way its layed out it would normally be referencing to the lad. My brain got stuck here for a seconds before I parsed it the way you meant. if you don't see an issue don't change it 👍

the previous paragraphs said he killed a fox and a bear. bear is mentioned twice so I assumed that's what was being referred to here. (especially since he says how he wishes he caught a boar)

"the moonlight was barely enough for him to see clearly"*

"Growing his attributes became harder as well. Warden had slain twice as many copper ranked beasts so far, but his attributes increased minimally."

As if it was only natural* you don't need the first "to be" here in this sentence.

had seen too much*

it hasn't been*

This is confusing. Pronouns such as "he" or "she", tend to refer to the last applicable noun used. In this case, you're trying to say that Liam is 3 or 4 years older than the lad. But you have used the "he" pronoun after referencing the lad as the last applicable male noun, so it reads as if the lad is 3 or 4 years older than some boy (possibly Liam). To fix this, change either "his eyes" to "Liam's eyes" or "even though he" to "even though Liam"

"led on to" isn't correct. "led on to" usually refers to an action or event causing another. From the context I can assume you ment that they were arriving at/entering the village. there are multiple options to use here, but "led on to" doesn't work

"get the trails" almost works here, but since you can't collect the trails themselves using "find the trails" is better

no, picturesque is correct here. picturesque - visually attractive, usually in a quaint or pretty style

"for the mission" or "during the mission" would work better here depending on the context.

tree* not three

bear* not boar.

thirst* referring to a need of water, I'm assuming he found something to drink but not eat then?

from the look of*

out of the death*

collapsed tree*