To put it simply the MC is a rapist. What reason could the MC have for this? Is the MC doing the rape because he was shown a little disrespect or is the reason because he found the young woman annoying? The MC is an INCEL. Because how can someone go from being a good, hardworking person to being a rapist? Or to put it simply, if someone sees women only as objects or possessions without rights, then this is the right story for this person.

DC Comics' 'no-kill' rule dates back to 1940 when Batman and Superman stopped taking lives. Today, it defines heroes from Nightwing to Shazam. DC Comics laid the groundwork for superheroes as fans know them, but a lot has changed since the 1930s. While the Justice League can implement a no-kill rule among the team, Green Arrow correctly points out that the team inadvertently kills people every day based on who they decide to save. Choosing who to save in a life-or-death situation is one of the greatest hardships of being a superhero. In Batman Begins, he comments that he avoids killing to avoid become like the criminals he faces, believing that doing so will make him no better than his enemies. Superman Wants To Give His Enemies a Chance at Redemption.

In medieval times, steel was made by heating iron over a coal fire over a period of time. So if he uses coal when forging why isn't it steel he creates? It is much more expensive to waste money on an iron sword that no one has a use for. If he made iron nails or copper pans/pots then I would understand.

So the MC has more than half the points (1130) and he can't wait for 2225?

Who could have predicted this? What a twist what a surprise it is an item.

As this story goes so far, I don't even have to read any further to realize that it's an item again.

Bruce Wayne = Wayne Enterprises, Inc., also known as WayneCorp and Wayne Industries -/- You can say that he owns the city. The company can be found all over the city in every way. Then there is the fact that he personally has something to do with almost every charitable organization. Then there are Gindergarten schools, universities and so on that he fenicates. There's a reason why everyone called him a prince (Prince of Gotham) when he was a kid.

You drew yourself incredibly. I think self-recognition is the first step to improvement. My tip for you is that you should fight your excess weight. It's easy to regulate. If you want, I can make you a training plan and a nutrition plan. I also understand that you hide behind vulgar language because you are really insecure about yourself. But that's not a bad thing. You have already taken the first step towards self-improvement, you looked in the mirror and realized that you are overweight with a really ugly personality. So my friend, I applaud you because the first step is always the hardest.

the strength of a giant = giant blood + magic

So do you do any of this HEMA, archery (hunting, club or sports), fencing, kendo and so on?

So what is with the minimum draw weight of 180lbs? I mean facts dön't lie.

Mildmay Stayner, Recorder of the British Long Bow Society, estimated the bows of the Medieval period drew 90–110 pounds-force, maximum, and W. F. Paterson, Chairman of the Society of Archer-Antiquaries, believed the weapon had a supreme draw weight of only 80–90 lb. Oh but the draw weight of few individual surviving bows has been as high as 185 pounds.

I mean you don't get what varied activity with more dimensions means. So this is why i used it . Is it wrong?

Than swordsmanship. To kill with a bow in war where people are in a big group is easier because bowmen are in units. The swordsman had to be upfront on the battlefield. You can shoot a war bow (not the size of the bow, but the draw weight makes it a war bow) in 12–24 (if you are fit and only shooting for a groop of people)months (i did need for a 140lbs to draw and shoot on a target around 25-26 months and i do it for a hobby not easy like in the films, 160lbs very hard for me to shoot and i don't always hit the target). A archer (there where archer units that hat to train for 4 to 8 years) used in war did not need to be as accurate as a hunter. Where swords can take years of training (do HEMA for 4 years know). Both weapons are bad against plate armor.

Both archery and swordsmanship require dedication and practice to master, but the difficulty of learning and mastering each skill can vary depending on individual preferences and physical abilities. Archery demands precise hand-eye coordination and a deep understanding of arrow trajectory and bow mechanics. Swordsmanship, on the other hand, requires strength, agility, and the ability to anticipate and react to an opponent's movements. Both disciplines have their own challenges and rewards, so the difficulty of learning and mastering them can be subjective.

Where did you get that? Sith allow one's emotions to take hold of oneself and thus achieve feats of power that were considered unnatural, as well as access the power of immortality in a quicker, easier fashion. Jedi don't allow their emotions to take hold of them. There can be love, happiness, friends and so on. Jedi learn to let go of emotions, but still feel them. A Jedi can be married and have a familie. Like = Kento Marek, Ranik Solusar, Nejaa Halcyon, Revan and Anakin Skywalker and so on.

Yoda: ''Train yourself to let go of everything you are afraid to lose'' You can love, you can care, but you shoud be able to let go of things and people. You know like an adult when you lose someone that you care for.

Author stop with the dual sword BS. Does or MC fight people with no armor or shield? Will he fight the small folk? Then, ok, dual sword it is. Or will he fight armored man at arms? Full-plate knights? If so, give him something useful, or at least something that is not as cringe-worthy as dual swords.

The crossbow was not outlawed because he could pierce plate armor. Plate armor, as we know it, was first used by a wider margin in the 1500–1600s. The crossbow was outlawed because it was so easy to use. Someone with a few days of training can kill someone (assassins, bandits, criminals and so on) from a distance easily (with no plate armor). Crossbow use was more against Brigandine and Cuirass (chest plates thinner than most plate armors and not all extras) armored troops. In war, the crossbow was used most of the time in sieges or defenses. The hammer or axe comes close, but it trades in a significant part of the envelope for penetrating abilities in the other parts of the envelope. A spear or halberd were much more effective than swords.

wow you have no idea how longbows are used. The longbows are weaker than the bent shortbows. They can't pierce plate armor. The English longbow has his fame for 2 reasons: 1) the British Empire (and their self-love) 2) when they won a battle in France (where they were on top of a hill after rain when the knights did charge - you know, soft earth + uphill charge is not a good idea). All in all, bows are more used for Levi troops and men at arms that have light armor, aka gambeson + chain mail (yeah, like half 60–70% of the army), but for knights or armored men at arms, they are quite useless.