True

Well negotiation is part of the game.

This is really good, i hope you continue.

If SI was a peasant or worse a serf, my man wouldn't be saying that but oh well. Fantasies of the mind, flights of insanity.

I would like to be the owner of PineApple

... ok, for a while now this MC has been pissing me off. Why does he want this to be done, the environment is important for everyone.

Plot crap comes in

not likely that the water is clean after a month.

Nasty stagnant water, probably full of mosquitoes and other stuff. NIce.

Lol, if you can do math very, very well the world is literally at your feet. Any advancement in mathematics trickles down to every other field of study. Math should be more important that how it is treated now. I admit, I wasn't that good at math but after going to college I realised that I am much better than a lot of other people. Get it together everyone, soldier on!

In good ol' England, the drinking age is 16 for Beer. It's all good for our lad.

Nah bruh, you in marvel and going for her. I cant imagine that. Lol

Good luck man, god bless

You are talking about Indira Gandhi. She was great yes, but she also was an authoritarian dictator who forced mass sterilization and killed a lot of people inadvertently. Great people does not necessarily mean good people. She was not Gandhi's niece, she was Jawaharlal Nehru's daughter who married a man named Gandhi. No relation to Mahatma at all. Also wars are a natural part of the human condition. It is seen even in Apes for resources such as food but is not seen when food is in abundance. When there is a lack of resources in one area, guess what, war is the fastest way to get resources. Eg, the Democratic Republic of Congo was destroyed for a large extent because of the vast resources, Belgian cruelty, and even now divided between war lords and corrupt politicians. To blame war on men alone is a fallacy, war was done for the betterment of a civilisation as a whole. BTW I am not saying wars are good, wars in the past served a purpose, the other one being a place where people in the lower income class could have an opportunity to rise above their station and attain some social mobility in the form of land grants or loot. The wars of today are just shows of the capability of military technology, especially after the advent of world trade, and easier access to rarer resources. Also, initially democratic rights were given to the aristocats, then the landed, then the rich, then the working poor and initially only for those who have participated in wars being a man did not mean that you could vote. Women traditionally did not participate in wars in European Nations and most of the world with the exceptions of a few countries like Sweden, Norway, and Denmark due to a lack of manpower and religious significance AKA Valkyries. Also most pagan religions were more favourable to women as a whole, with abrahamic religions like Islam, Christianity and Judaism they directly reflect the dogma espoused by their respective Holy Books and the area they came from namely the Middle East and the Levant. Hence why voting rights took so long to be given to women. Cultural inertia and the fact that people in power are highly resistant to anyform of change which would weaken their overall control. Women started participating the workforce due to reduction in the effort taken to maintain a house with the advent of refrigerators, washing machines etc. You could say that women's liberalisation can be linked with technological advancement. So, in medieval periods where manual labour had to be done to take care of home. Unless you were already wealthy there is no way that most women could participate in any of these fields. This would include most men as well as Poverty was more widespread then especially since the families would be very large the duties of women are proportional to the work done by men except that it is done at home and not in public. Also just a reminder, working in the medieval era is fraught with danger, people died in unexpected and horrible ways. Hence why women tended to live longer than men as long as they did not die during labour or in raid. The authors views may be crude, but in this period of time it is the harsh truth. Only from the 19th Century onwards can you expect to see the changes slowly coming about society that is more inline with our viewpoint as modern individuals. Yes, women can do more but in this period of time. The pressures of life would prevent most women who are not fabulously wealthy, raised by tolerant families, or married to supportive men would simply never achieve anything as they can not make the time to do it. Thank you for your time, have a nice day. **: To the author the line is distasteful and unnecessary. Though it is to be expected as the character seems to be an asshole. I hope he is not a reflection of your real world outlook. Thank you for the work.

Well it is true, but at the same time women have contributed to health and medicine. The advances of science and tech is a contribution of both genders.

I'm not sure thug was even part of the english language at the time. Thug is actually from Thuggee which was a gang in India who used to rob people on the highway by strangling them. The English got the word when the East India Company exterminated them. Apparently the last leader of the thuggees killed over 8,000 people or something. I think a better word would be Highway Man, in the context that I highly doubt the English knew much about Thuggees at this time.

lol, never know when the overlords are going to decide to ban stuff

Actually I have a serious question, why do you include sexual content? Especially since we will never know when webnovel will bring the ban hammer down. I literally could not find your novel on the general search bar. I think they are reviewing your novel. Maybe you should consider toning it down, or do a fade to black kind of thing?

Damn man...

Drone strikes are terrible, tbh, it kind of sucks that a lot of the world is so messed up.