You could still make the case that since ignorance isn't "good" by definition it has to be bad. But yeah, people aren't all atrocious villain for being ignorant.

Thanks a lot for your help man. Feedback like yours helps.

Thanks a lot for the review and for having read this far. I do agree with your criticism. I've already had to rewrite the first volume because of the long-windedness and I was planning to do the same with the second volume. If you will allow me one question, would you say the "tedious and garrulous" writing style was too much too bear even in the first volume? Thanks for your time.

best review so far

Thanks for the review. If you have time, I could use your help: Are we clear its up to the 8th chapter that my text is a pain in the ass to read? After the 8th chapter, you said things get much better, so I can understand I don't have to go out of my way the rest right? Also, I always thought the prologue was pretty well written. Do you include it (first 3 chapters) in your analysis of the first chapters? As I understand it, the longwindedness of the first chapters is the main issue, right? Thank you very much!

More

zudooonnnnn

zupaaaaaaash

hiyaaaa

Hahahahaha no no definitely not. You were just being frank and direct, I should say thanks rather than you say sorry. Have my thumbsup good man

It's definitely not wrong, but if I want to delete the reviews that don't follow the proper rules of an evaluation, then I should also delete the 5-star reviews that just go "................................................." since they also aren't proper reviews with no actual evaluation. So, I get your point, it's shameless. And that's fair.

Thanks a lot. It does seem to me people who give the book very positive reviews (actual reviews with an evaluation) are the ones who read till at least they finish the 1st book. Youre absolutely right about the writing quality. Having a proper grammar isn't a complicated skill, but storytelling is an art that I'm still working on.

Test2

Test

Test3

Test2

Test

what, so you decided to read more than 10 chapters after your biased negative review in which you only criticize the wordy, long-winded narrative of the early chapters among others things (which I edited) and still give me very few stars for all the other aspects of the book you don't have a problem with? your review didn't please me, and it didn't make sense for the aforementioned reasons, so I deleted it yes. I received criticism, which was fair and justified, without deleting the reviews. There you have my justification. I feel like I have to apologize since it obviously hurt your feelings tho so sorry for not telling you or something. I should have

stf u noob

ab