No_One_1398

That is correct, however it is not based on any of the rating criteria. Considering the review is the average of „Writing Quality”, „Story Developement”, „Updating Stability”, „World Building” and „Character Design”. So, can you tell me how come you rated all of them as 1/5 star without having read the novel, while citing an „afterword” comment as a review?

*h->g

Can you explain why you have this novel a 1/5 star rating, without even bothering to read it?

Upon further review, the author has significantly improved their writing skills from ch. 50 to 51, to the point it qualifies as an actual novel instead of a child’s ramblings. From chapter 51, it is actually readable, though it remains to be seen whether the author can keep up the quality.

This book is completely unreadable, considering its lack of grammatical coherence. The author most definitely is not qualified to write a book in English, in fact, Chinese MTL’s are of a significantly higher quality… and that’s a low bar…

Sure, as long as you don’t insult me.

If you have any questions regarding the novel, ask here.