Fullmetal

Enjoyable read, easily one of the best stories on the site but grammar could use some work or at least put it though AI, grammarly or some other program. Another solution is to have someone proofread it.

Really no point in going that far, just a waste of time. If he cared that much he would've told them and allowed them to come to the new world with him.

Would anyone else be able to go to the new world if they bought the company in the future and started the servers again? For that reason i wouldn't tell anyone.

That's just pure magic power, that doesn't mean he is weaker and is probably the most worst way to judge someone's strength. Plus that was the last time he was tested, he could have more magic power now.

That's mainly because naruto is too dumb. He doesn't have a good reason to not use shadow clones to do paperwork and also is there a need for him to do it all on his own? Why not delegate less important decisions to other people like Shikamaru or let him lead a group under him.

我妻上将军，开局坑杀敌军四十万

I don't think that you can't bow or do something if you have conqueror's haki, the intent behind your actions matter the most. Do you remember when shanks allowed people to beat him up in a bar? he had someone break a bottle by hitting his head with it and yet he has conqueror's haki. Luffy and Zoro early on in the anime allowed themselves to be beaten up in a bar because they decided not to fight back, it has been really long ago first few hundred episodes i think, they gave their word for nami that they won't fight if i remember correctly, yet luffy has conqueror's haki. Gol D. Roger was actually in that position when he got executed, yes he may have been forced to bow down for his execution, but would someone with conqueror's haki ever be able to bow? It feels stupid to me to tie bowing to not having conqueror's haki or any other action for that matter.

You're still not getting it, there's a difference between doing a good deed, minimal help like giving someone 5$ or so, or helping them in the moment where you don't actually use too many resources of your own. Its a completely different story when you let someone live in your house for a month and feed him, compared to helping someone cross the street. Either way if i decide to help someone i don't really ask for repayment if i don't need it, but if i fall in a bad situation and they are in position to help me, i'd expect it if they knew about it. When you help someone when he is the most vulnerable, and then in 10-15 years, you fall into that state, and they don't help you isn't that what ungratefulness is?

Also i forgot to mention that your comparison is a bit stupid. If you let someone live in your house when they have nowhere to go, you spent money on their food, not once but multiple times. Can't really be compared to giving 5-10$ to someone on the streets.

You're replying to comments 5 months old. I never said that they need to give their life for him and do everything if he ever asks, but if someone is in a really bad situation yet he helped you when you needed it the most, are you not expected to pay them back or at least help them stand up on their feet? You are a really an ungrateful person, i'd never want to be the one to help someone like you, who doesn't even know what gratefulness means.