August 29, 2023

today's featured article

Lost in Translation (film)

Article Talk

Language

Watch

Edit

Lost in Translation is a 2003 romantic comedy-drama film[note 1] written and directed by Sofia Coppola. Bill Murray stars as Bob Harris, a fading American movie star who is having a midlife crisis when he travels to Tokyo to promote Suntory whisky. There, he befriends another estranged American named Charlotte (Scarlett Johansson), a young woman and recent college graduate. Giovanni Ribisi and Anna Faris also feature. The film explores themes of alienation and disconnection against a backdrop of cultural displacement in Japan. It defies mainstream narrative conventions and is atypical in its depiction of romance.[4]

Lost in Translation

Theatrical release poster

Directed by

Sofia Coppola

Written by

Sofia Coppola

Produced by

Ross Katz

Sofia Coppola

Starring

Bill Murray

Scarlett Johansson

Giovanni Ribisi

Anna Faris

Fumihiro Hayashi

Cinematography

Lance Acord

Edited by

Sarah Flack

Music by

Kevin Shields

Brian Reitzell

Roger Joseph Manning Jr.

Production

companies

American Zoetrope

Elemental Films

Distributed by

Focus Features (United States)

Tohokushinsha Film (Japan)

Release dates

August 29, 2003 (Telluride Film Festival)

September 12, 2003 (United States)

April 17, 2004 (Japan)[1]

Running time

102 minutes[2]

Countries

United States[3]

Japan[3]

Language

English[2]

Budget

$4 million

Box office

$118.7 million

Coppola started writing the film after spending time in Tokyo and becoming fond of the city. She began forming a story about two characters experiencing a "romantic melancholy"[5] in the Park Hyatt Tokyo, where she stayed while promoting her first feature film, the 1999 drama The Virgin Suicides. Coppola envisioned Murray playing the role of Bob Harris from the beginning and tried to recruit him for up to a year, relentlessly sending him telephone messages and letters. While Murray eventually agreed to play the part, he did not sign a contract; Coppola spent a quarter of the film's $4 million budget without knowing if he would actually appear for shooting. When Murray finally arrived, Coppola described feelings of significant relief.

Principal photography began on September 29, 2002, and lasted 27 days. Coppola kept a flexible schedule during filming with a small crew and minimal equipment. The screenplay was short and Coppola often allowed a significant amount of improvisation during filming. The film's director of photography, Lance Acord, used available light as often as possible, and many Japanese places of business and public areas were used as locations for shooting. After 10 weeks of editing, Coppola sold distribution rights for the United States and Canada to Focus Features, and the company promoted the film by generating positive word of mouth before its theatrical release.

Lost in Translation premiered on August 29, 2003, at the Telluride Film Festival, and was distributed to American theatres on September 12, 2003, to major critical and commercial success. Critics praised the performances of Murray and Johansson as well as the writing and direction of Coppola; minor criticism was given to the film's depiction of Japan. At the 76th Academy Awards, Lost in Translation won Coppola the Best Original Screenplay, and the film was also nominated for Best Picture, Best Director (Coppola), and Best Actor (Murray). Other accolades won include three Golden Globe Awards and three British Academy Film Awards.

Plot

Bob Harris is a fading American movie star who arrives in Tokyo to appear in lucrative advertisements for Suntory whisky. He stays at the upscale Park Hyatt Tokyo and is miserable due to problems within his 25-year marriage and a midlife crisis. Charlotte, another American staying at the hotel, is a young Yale graduate in philosophy who is accompanying her husband John while he works as a celebrity photographer. Charlotte is feeling similarly disenchanted as she questions her marriage and is anxious about her future. They both struggle with additional bouts of jet lag and culture shock in Tokyo and pass the time loitering around the hotel.

Charlotte is repelled by a vacuous Hollywood actress named Kelly, who is also at the hotel promoting a film. She bumps into Charlotte and John, gushing over photography sessions she has previously done with him. Bob and Charlotte frequently cross paths in the hotel and eventually introduce themselves to each other in the hotel bar.

After several encounters, when John is on assignment outside Tokyo, Charlotte invites Bob into the city to meet some local friends. They bond over an evening in Tokyo, where they experience the city nightlife together. In the days that follow, Bob and Charlotte spend more time together, and their friendship strengthens. One night, while neither can sleep, the two share an intimate conversation about Charlotte's personal uncertainties and their married lives.

Bob spends the night with a jazz singer from the hotel bar on the penultimate night of his stay and Charlotte hears the woman singing in Bob's room the next morning, leading to tension between Bob and Charlotte during lunch together later that day. The pair re-encounter each other in the evening and Bob reveals that he will be leaving Tokyo the following day.

Bob and Charlotte reconcile and express how they will miss each other, making a final visit to the hotel bar. The next morning, when Bob is leaving the hotel, he and Charlotte share sincere but unsatisfactory goodbyes. On Bob's taxi ride to the airport, he sees Charlotte on a crowded street, stops the car, and walks to her. He then embraces her and whispers something in her ear. The two share a kiss and say goodbye before Bob departs.

Cast

Bill Murray as Bob Harris, a fading movie star

Scarlett Johansson as Charlotte, a recent college graduate

Giovanni Ribisi as John, Charlotte's husband, a celebrity photographer

Anna Faris as Kelly, a Hollywood actress

Fumihiro Hayashi as Charlie, Charlotte's friend

Catherine Lambert as a jazz singer[note 2]

Analysis

Themes

He was trapped. ... When you go to a foreign country, truly foreign, there is a major shock of consciousness that comes on you when you see that, "Oh God, it's just me here." There's nobody, no neighbors, no friends, no phone calls—just room service.

—Bill Murray, speaking about Bob Harris[7]

The film's writer-director, Sofia Coppola, has described Lost in Translation as a story about "things being disconnected and looking for moments of connection",[8] a perspective that has been shared by critics and scholars. In a cultural sense, Bob and Charlotte are disoriented by feelings of jet lag and culture shock as a result of foreign travel to Japan. Bob is bewildered by his interactions with a Japanese commercial director whom he cannot understand, realizing that the meaning of his communication is "lost in translation" by an interpreter.[9][note 3] Moreover, both are sleepless from a change in time zone, choosing to cope with their wakefulness by making late-night visits to the hotel bar. Such feelings provoke a sense of estrangement from their environment, but they also exacerbate deeper experiences of alienation and disconnection in their lives.[4] Bob and Charlotte are both in troubled marriages and facing similar crises of identity; Charlotte is unsure of what to do with her life and questions what role she should embrace in the world, while Bob is invariably reminded of his fading stature as a movie star and feels disassociated from the identity by which he is already defined.[11]

Such experiences are heightened by the characters' contact with the city environment of Tokyo. Bob feels alienated by seeing his likeness used in an advertisement while he is driven from the airport to his hotel, and the colorful cityscape is rendered as a frenetic environment by which he is overwhelmed.[12][note 4] Charlotte feels adrift as she attempts to find meaning while wandering Tokyo,[13] and feels isolated as she peers over the city from her hotel room window.[14] The Park Hyatt Tokyo offers hermetic qualities that insulate the characters from the city and is the site Bob chooses to seek refuge from his ails.[15] These shared impressions of alienation create common ground for Bob and Charlotte to cultivate a personal connection.[4] When Charlotte invites Bob to experience the Tokyo nightlife, she reduces his sense of distance from the city[4] and the two develop a connection based on small moments together. In the little time they have together, each realize they are not alone in seeking a sense of something deeper in their lives.[16] Coppola, speaking about the brief nature of their encounter, remarked, "For everyone, there are those moments when you have great days with someone you wouldn't expect to. Then you have to go back to your real lives, but it makes an impression on you. It's what makes it so great and enjoyable."[17]

Geoff King, a scholar who wrote a book about the film, comments that the experiences of the central characters are one factor that lends Lost in Translation to varied interpretations by academics.[18] Todd McGowan reads the film from a Lacanian psychoanalytic perspective, arguing that the film encourages the embrace of "absence" in one's life and relationships.[19] He describes Coppola's depiction of Tokyo "as a city bubbling over with excess", which offers an empty promise of gratification.[20] In his view, both Bob and Charlotte recognize that they cannot find meaning in Tokyo's attractions, so they bond over their shared sense of emptiness in them.[20] Lucy Bolton offers a feminist reading, arguing that Lost in Translation evokes the thought of feminist philosopher Luce Irigaray by highlighting issues of young womanhood. She argues that the film provides a complex portrait of Charlotte's female subjectivity and an optimistic rendering of the character's pursuit for individual expression.[21]

Narrative

Lost in Translation has been broadly examined in terms of its narrative structure, with commentators noting that it contains few plot events as compared with films in the Hollywood mainstream. Narrative events are mostly focused on the development of Bob and Charlotte's relationship,[22] with few "external" obstacles that impact the central characters.[23] King notes, "More time is taken to evoke the impressions, feelings, and experiences of the central characters",[24] which represents "a shift in the hierarchical arrangement of [film elements]" that prioritizes character experiences over plot.[25] The literary critic Steve Vineberg argues that "the links of the story are indeed there, only they're not typical cause-and-effect connections. They're formed by the emotions that gather at the end of one episode and pour into the next".[26] King maintains that while the plot does progress according to a basic linear causality,[22] "If the episodic quality often seems to the fore, this is partly a matter of the pacing of individual sequences that are very often leisurely and dedicated to the establishment or development of mood and atmospherics".[24] Coppola said she wanted the story to emphasize the qualities of an intimate moment, and she did not want to impose grandiose narrative devices on the characters such as "a war keeping them apart".[27][note 5]

Coppola said of the film's opening shot, "I don't have a really good reason for it.... It's just how I wanted to start the movie. I liked having a hint of the character—a sweet, young girl waiting around in her hotel room—and then go into the story".[29][note 6]

The film's opening shot has been another point of discussion among critics and scholars. The 36-second shot, which features Charlotte's backside as she lies on a bed wearing transparent pink panties, is based on the photorealist paintings of John Kacere[32] and has often been compared to the initial appearance of Brigitte Bardot in the 1963 film Contempt.[note 7] While some have described it as a foreshadowing of a romance between Bob and Charlotte,[note 8] film historian Wendy Haslem argues that "Coppola's intention with this opening shot appears to be to defy taboos and to undermine expectations surrounding what might be considered the 'money shot' in more traditionally exploitative cinema."[4] Correspondingly, the academic Maria San Filippo maintains that "[Coppola] doesn't seem to be making a statement at all beyond a sort of endorsement of beauty for beauty's sake."[33] King notes that the image contains both "subtle" and "obvious" appeal in its combination of aesthetic and erotic qualities, which signifies Lost in Translation's position between mainstream and independent film.[34] The film scholar Todd Kennedy interprets it in terms of feminist film theorist Laura Mulvey's conception of the male gaze, arguing that the shot "lasts so long as to become awkward—forcing the audience to become aware of (and potentially even question) their participation in the gaze."[35]

Lost in Translation has also been noted for defying the conventions of mainstream romantic films. Haslem writes that the classic romantic comedy assures the audience that the couple has a future, but Coppola defies expectations by refusing to unite the central characters.[4] She points to elements such as Bob and Charlotte's lack of sexual consummation as one factor that obscures whether their pairing is more romantic or platonic. Writing about the concluding sequence in which the characters make their final goodbyes, Haslem argues, "Conventionally in mainstream cinema, the kiss ... signifies resolution by reinforcing the myth of romantic love. But in this new wave of contemporary anti-romance romance, the kiss signifies ambiguity."[4] The academic Nicholas Y.B. Wong contends that the film's lack of "heart-melting connections and melodramatic (re)unions between characters" represents a postmodern portrait of love, writing that Lost in Translation is "about non-love, the predominance of affairs and the complexities of intimacy. Characters vacillate between falling in love and out of love. They are neither committed to someone nor emotionally unattached."[12] Coppola said Bob and Charlotte's relationship is "supposed to be romantic but on the edge. ... [A] little bit more than friends but not an actual romance. ... To me, it's pretty un-sexual between them—innocent and romantic, and a friendship."[36]

Production

Writing

Sofia Coppola promoting Lost in Translation at the 2003 Toronto International Film Festival

After dropping out of college in her early twenties,[37] Coppola often traveled to Tokyo, trying out a variety of jobs in fashion and photography.[38] Unsure of what to do for a career, she described this period as a "kind of crisis"[37] in which she meandered around the city contemplating her future.[29] She came to feel fond of Tokyo, noting an otherworldly quality brought on as a foreigner grappling with feelings of jet lag in an unfamiliar setting.[39] After many years, she settled on a career in filmmaking and returned to the city, staying at the Park Hyatt Tokyo to promote her first feature film, the 1999 drama The Virgin Suicides.[17][note 9]

Coppola began writing Lost in Translation after returning home from this press tour.[8] Having been influenced by her background in Tokyo, she resolved to write a screenplay set there[17][note 10] and began forming a story about two characters experiencing a "romantic melancholy" in the Park Hyatt Tokyo.[5] Coppola was long attracted to the neon signs of the city and envisaged Tokyo taking on a "dreamy feeling" in the film.[38] She recruited her friend Brian Reitzell, who ultimately served as the film's music producer, to create dream pop compilation mixes that she listened to while writing to help establish this mood.[41]

Coppola did not initially write the screenplay in traditional script form, citing the difficulty of mapping out a full plot.[5] Instead, she opted to write "little paragraphs" largely based on disparate impressions and experiences of her life in Tokyo, which she then adapted to a script.[5] Among the first images she included was of her friend Fumihiro Hayashi performing a karaoke rendition of the Sex Pistols' "God Save the Queen", which Coppola saw him perform during the time she worked in Tokyo.[29] After writing the first 20 pages with help from her brother, Roman Coppola, she returned to Tokyo for further inspiration.[8] There, she videotaped anything she could use as a further writing aid.[36]

Coppola envisioned Murray playing the role of Bob from the beginning, wanting to show off "his more sensitive side"[36] and feeling amused by the image of him dressed in a kimono.[17] She described her mental pictures of Murray as a significant source of inspiration for the story.[6] For the character of Charlotte, Coppola drew from her own feelings of early-twenties disorientation, citing the strain in her relationship with her then-husband Spike Jonze as an influence for the relationship between Charlotte and John.[42] She also drew inspiration from J. D. Salinger's character Franny in Franny and Zooey, finding appeal in "the idea of a preppy girl having a breakdown".[37]

As she developed the relationship between Bob and Charlotte, Coppola was compelled by the juxtaposition of the characters having similar internal crises at different stages of their lives.[43] She cited the dynamic between Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall in The Big Sleep as a source of inspiration for their relationship.[8] Coppola reported doing little re-writing of the script,[16] which took six months to complete[8] and culminated in 75 pages, much shorter than the average feature film script.[44][note 11] Despite worrying that the screenplay was too short and "indulgent" for including assortments of her personal experiences, she resolved to begin production of the film.[37]

Development

Bill Murray in 2014 (left) and Scarlett Johansson in 2008 (right)

Coppola maintained that she would not have made Lost in Translation without Murray.[32] The actor had an 800 number for prospective clients interested in casting him, but he had a reputation as a recluse who was difficult to contact.[46] Coppola relentlessly pursued him and sent telephone messages and letters for months.[43] She also sought people in her professional network that might help her make contact.[31] She recruited screenwriter Mitch Glazer, who was a longtime friend of Murray's, to accept an early version of the script and try to persuade him.[42] Glazer was impressed with the story and said he called the actor frequently, telling him, "You need to read this",[46] but he would not provide an answer.[42] After up to a year of cajoling, Murray finally agreed to meet with Coppola at a restaurant to discuss the film.[42] He then accepted the role, saying "she spent a lot of time getting me to be the guy. In the end, I felt I couldn't let her down."[31]

Despite Murray's agreement, Coppola had to take him at his word, as he did not sign a formal contract.[8] She described this as "nerve-wracking", wondering if he would show up for filming in Tokyo.[8] She discussed the issue with director Wes Anderson, who had previously worked with the actor and encouraged her, saying, "If he says he's going to do it, he'll show up."[8] For Murray's co-star, Coppola liked Johansson's performance in Manny & Lo, remembering her "as a cute little girl with that husky voice".[17] She then invited Johansson to a restaurant to discuss the role.[30] Initially worried that the 17-year-old Johansson might be too young to play a character in her twenties, the director concluded that she appeared older and could convincingly play the part.[47] Coppola offered Johansson the role without an audition, which she accepted.[30]

Feeling a sense of personal investment in the project, Coppola wanted to maintain final cut privilege and feared that a distribution deal with a North American studio would threaten her influence.[8] It was also unlikely that a studio would provide such backing, given the short length of the screenplay and Murray's lack of formal involvement.[48] Instead, she and her agent opted to sell foreign distribution rights to an assortment of companies to fund production costs of $4 million.[8] She struck a deal first with Japan's Tohokushinsha Film, then with distributors in France and Italy, and finally with the international arm of Focus Features for the remaining foreign market.[8] By piecing together the funding from multiple distributors, Coppola reduced the influence of any single financier.[48] Still not knowing if Murray would show up in Tokyo, Coppola spent $1 million of the budget,[8] knowing that his absence would doom the production. When he finally arrived, days before filming, she expressed significant relief.[49]

Filming

The production used bystanders as extras in public areas such as Shibuya Crossing.

Principal photography began on September 29, 2002,[50] and lasted 27 days.[17] With a tight schedule and a limited $4 million budget, filming was done six days per week and was marked by a "run-and-gun" approach: Coppola was keen to stay mobile with a small crew and minimal equipment.[36] She conducted few rehearsals and kept a flexible schedule, sometimes scrapping filming plans to shoot something she noticed on location if she thought it better served the story.[10][note 12] Since the screenplay was sparse, missing details were often addressed during shooting, and Coppola allowed a significant amount of improvisation in dialogue, especially from Murray.[16] One example includes the scene in which Bob is being photographed for Suntory whisky; Coppola encouraged Murray to react to the photographer spontaneously as she whispered names for the man to repeat to Murray as unrehearsed dialogue, such as "Roger Moore".[16][6][note 13]

While key crew members were Americans that Coppola invited to Tokyo, most of the crew was hired locally.[10] This proved to be challenging for the production, as most of the Japanese crew could not communicate with Coppola in English, so both sides relied on translations from a bilingual assistant director and a gaffer.[36] The production encountered frequent delays while translations took place and suffered from occasional cultural misunderstandings; in one example, Coppola described a shoot in a restaurant that ran 10–15 minutes late, something she said was normal on an American shoot,[17] but it prompted the restaurant owner to feel disrespected; he subsequently disconnected the crew's lights and the film's Japanese location manager resigned.[8] Despite this, Coppola said she worked to adapt to a Japanese style of filmmaking, not wanting to impose an approach that her crew was not used to.[36]

Coppola worked closely to visualize the film with her director of photography, Lance Acord. She showed him and other key crew members a book of photographs she created that represented the visual style she wanted to convey in the film.[16] To evoke a sense of isolation in Bob, Coppola and Acord used stationary shots in the hotel and avoided conspicuous camera movements.[51] They also had numerous discussions about shooting on video, but they ultimately decided that film better suited the romantic undertones of the story.[36] Coppola remarked, "Film gives a little bit of a distance, which feels more like a memory to me. Video is more present tense".[36] Acord believed that new film stocks would reduce the need for excessive lighting, ultimately using Kodak Vision 500T 5263 35 mm stock for night exteriors and Kodak Vision 320T 5277 stock in daylight.[52] Most of the film was shot with an Aaton 35-III camera. For some confined locations where the Aaton would have been too noisy, a Moviecam Compact was used.[52]

With high-speed film stocks, Acord chose to utilize available light as often as possible,[53] only supplementing with artificial lights when necessary.[52] He reported "never really" rigging lights for night exteriors, relying on the natural light on Tokyo's city streets.[52] For interior sequences in the Park Hyatt Tokyo, he relied mostly on the hotel's practical lighting sources, shooting at a wide open f-stop and heavily cutting the light to eliminate reflections in the hotel window.[54] Acord said he heard objections about lighting from some of the Japanese electricians, who were unaccustomed to relying so much on available light and were concerned that the exposure would not be sufficient.[55] Acord, assured that the film stocks would hold up against lower lighting, ultimately shot much of the film two stops underexposed.[53]

Many of the shooting locations were Japanese places of business and public areas at the time of filming, including New York Bar in the Park Hyatt Tokyo and Shibuya Crossing in Tokyo. On public streets and subways, the production did not secure filming permits[32] and relied on city bystanders as extras;[36] Coppola described the shooting as "documentary-style"[17] and was worried at times about getting stopped by police, so she kept a minimal crew.[36] In the hotel, the production was not allowed to shoot in public areas until 1 or 2 a.m. to avoid disturbing guests.[56] In the film's concluding sequence in which Bob and Charlotte make their final goodbyes, Coppola reported being unhappy with the dialogue she had scripted, so Murray improvised the whisper in Johansson's ear.[16] Too quiet to be understandable, Coppola considered dubbing audio in the scene, but she ultimately decided it was better that it "stays between the two of them".[16] After production concluded, Coppola supervised 10 weeks of editing by Sarah Flack in New York City.[28]

Soundtrack

Main article: Lost in Translation (soundtrack)

The film's soundtrack was released by Emperor Norton Records on September 9, 2003.[57] It contains 15 tracks, largely from the shoegaze and dream pop genres of indie and alternative rock. The soundtrack was supervised by Brian Reitzell and contains songs from artists and groups including Death in Vegas, Phoenix, Squarepusher, Sébastien Tellier, and Happy End. The Jesus and Mary Chain's song "Just Like Honey" and "Sometimes" by My Bloody Valentine featured, and four original tracks were written for Lost in Translation by the latter band's frontman, Kevin Shields.[58] Other tracks produced for the film include two co-written by Reitzell and Roger Joseph Manning Jr., and one by Air.[58] Songs featured in the film that are not in the soundtrack include karaoke performances of Elvis Costello's cover of "(What's So Funny 'Bout) Peace, Love, and Understanding" and the Pretenders' "Brass in Pocket". A further performance by Murray of Roxy Music's "More Than This" is included as a bonus track.[note 14]

During the screenwriting stage, Coppola spoke to Reitzell about the "moody" and "melancholic" qualities she wanted the music to convey in the film, as well as what Reitzell understood to be the "strange, floating, jet-lagged weirdness" that would define the central characters.[41] Coppola said she wanted the soundtrack "to be less like a score" and more like the dream-pop mixes Reitzell made to assist her writing of the film.[17] While Shields had released little music since the release of Loveless in 1991,[59] at Reitzell's suggestion, he and Coppola enlisted him to help write original music for the film;[60] Reitzell believed Shields "could capture that droning, swaying, beautiful kind of feeling that we wanted."[41] He then joined Shields in London for some two months[61] of overnight recording sessions, and they used the screenplay and dailies from production as inspiration while they worked on songs for the film.[41] Shields commented on the challenge he felt in songwriting for a film, saying "I was barely aware of the language of music that's not essentially just for your ears. ... In the end, just the physical movement of the film, that was a delicacy. And I suppose that's why I ended up doing stuff that was so delicate."[58]

King argues that music often plays the most significant role in setting mood and tone in the film, writing that it is substantial "in evoking the dreamy, narcotised, semi-detached impressions of jet-lag" as well as broader feelings of alienation and disconnection, "making what is probably the largest single contribution to the widespread understanding of the film as a 'mood piece'."[62] He points to the use of "Girls" by Death in Vegas, featured in the early sequence in which Bob is driven from the airport to the hotel, arguing that it "plays a role equal to if not dominating that of the visuals ..., creating a drifting, ethereal and somewhat dreamy quality that precisely captures the impressions of temporal and spatial disjunction".[63] He also points to the use of "cool and distant" tracks like "Tommib", used in the extended sequence featuring Charlotte observing Tokyo while seated in her hotel room window, as playing a significant role in establishing feelings of isolation and disorientation in the character.[64] In King's view, some sequences feature combinations of music and visuals so as to function as "audio-visual set pieces", which offer distinct points of appeal in the film for its target audience.[65]

Release

Marketing

Coppola did not sell distribution rights for the United States and Canada until she and Flack finished editing the film.[44] In February 2003, the director showed the film to top executives at the domestic arm of Focus Features,[44] the company to which it had already sold most of the foreign distribution. The prior contract proved to be significant for Focus, as it received privileged access to the film while competing buyers complained that they were restricted to the viewing of a three-minute trailer in the Focus offices at the American Film Market.[66] Coppola initially offered the domestic distribution rights for $5 million, but she decided to sell them to Focus for $4 million, citing her appreciation for the international deals the company had secured for the film.[44]

Once Focus was involved, it began promoting the film by employing a conventional "indie-style" marketing campaign.[67] The strategy involved generating positive word of mouth for the film well before its September 2003 release.[68] The distributor arranged advance press screenings throughout the summer of 2003 and combined this with a magazine publicity campaign.[68][note 15] Posters and trailers emphasized the recognizable star presence of Murray, highlighting his performance in the film's comic sequences, which favored wider audience appeal.[69] Immediately prior to its release, Focus placed Lost in Translation in film festivals and hosted "intimate media screenings" that included question-and-answer panels with Coppola and Murray.[44] Many of these marketing tacks were designed to promote the film at minimal cost, a departure from more costly strategies often employed in the Hollywood mainstream, such as major television advertising.[67]

Theatrical run

Lost in Translation had its premiere on August 29, 2003, at the Telluride Film Festival in the United States.[3] Two days later, it appeared at the Venice Film Festival in Italy, and on September 5, 2003, it was shown at the Toronto International Film Festival in Canada.[3] It opened to the public in limited release on September 12, 2003, at 23 theaters in major cities in the United States, including New York City, Los Angeles, and San Francisco.[70] The film had already generated speculation about Oscar contention from advance screenings and was noted for opening several weeks earlier than expected for an indie vying for awards—a risk being that opening too early might cause the film to be forgotten by the time nominations were made for major prizes like the Academy Awards.[68][71] Focus Features co-presidents James Schamus and David Linde commented that the company chose an early release date on the basis of factors including the film's quality and early marketing campaign, as well as a lack of competition from other films.[68] The strategy was intended to give Lost in Translation more time to command the marketplace.[72]

Graph showing the estimated number of theaters in which Lost in Translation played in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico in 2003–2004.[73] Focus Features expanded its theater presence in January after it received nominations for the 76th Academy Awards.

The film grossed $925,000 in its opening weekend and was expanded the next week from 23 theaters to 183[68] in the top 25 markets of the country.[70] There, it grossed more than $2.62 million over the weekend[74] and nearly paid off the total budget of the film. It entered wide release on October 3,[note 16] its fourth weekend, peaking at a rank of seven in the box office chart;[73] a week later, it expanded to an estimated 882 theaters, the film's highest theater count over its run.[73] Lost in Translation grossed an estimated to-date total of $18.5 million through October 13[73] and was noted by The Hollywood Reporter to have been performing well even "in smaller and medium-sized markets where audiences don't always respond to this type of upscale material".[68] Following this performance, Lost in Translation saw a gradual decline in theater presence progressing into the new year,[73] though it was expanded again after the film received nominations for the 76th Academy Awards.[75] The film was widened from a late December low of 117 theaters to an estimated 632 at the end of January, ultimately ending its run in the United States and Canada on March 25 and earning $44.6 million.[73] Its international release earned $74.1 million, for a worldwide total of $118.7 million.[73]

Home media

The DVD of Lost in Translation was released on February 3, 2004,[76] and includes deleted scenes, a behind-the-scenes featurette, a conversation about the film featuring Murray and Coppola, and a music video for "City Girl",[77] one of the original songs composed for the film by Kevin Shields. Wanting to capitalize on the publicity surrounding Lost in Translation's presence at the Academy Awards, Focus Features made the unusual move of releasing the film on home media while it was still screening in theaters, immediately after its Oscar nominations were announced.[75] The strategy was seen as risky, as the industry was generally concerned that theatrical revenues could be harmed by early home video release.[75] Lost in Translation ultimately earned nearly $5 million from its first five days of video rentals and sold one million retail copies during its first week of release.[78] Early returns showed it was the second-best selling DVD during this period[78] while the film screened in 600 theaters and box office revenues dropped 19% from the previous week, which Variety described as "relatively modest".[79] Focus credited the performance to positive word of mouth and cited the marketing for the film on both media as helpful for whichever platform consumers chose.[79]

Lost in Translation was later released on the now-obsolete HD DVD format on May 29, 2007,[80] and on Blu-ray on December 7, 2010.[81]

Reception

Critical response

Lost in Translation received widespread critical acclaim, particularly for Murray's performance and for Coppola's direction and screenplay.[82] On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of 95% based on 232 reviews, with an average rating of 8.4/10. The site's critical consensus reads, "Effectively balancing humor and subtle pathos, Sofia Coppola crafts a moving, melancholy story that serves as a showcase for both Bill Murray and Scarlett Johansson."[83] On Metacritic, which assigns a normalized rating to reviews, the film has an average score of 91 out of 100 based on 44 reviews, indicating "universal acclaim".[84]

Critics widely praised Murray's performance as Bob, commending his handling of a more serious role that was combined with the comic persona for which he was already broadly known. Writing for Slate, David Edelstein argued that it was "the Bill Murray performance we've been waiting for", adding that "his two halves have never come together as they do here, in a way that connects that hilarious detachment with the deep and abiding sense of isolation that must have spawned it".[85] Lisa Schwarzbaum of Entertainment Weekly regarded Murray's performance as Oscar-worthy and lauded it as his "most vulnerable and unmannered" to date; she praised his treatment of a more delicate role as well as his improvisations in the film's comic sequences.[86] The New York Times critic Elvis Mitchell had similar praise, calling Lost in Translation "Mr. Murray's movie" and remarking that the actor "supplies the kind of performance that seems so fully realized and effortless that it can easily be mistaken for not acting at all".[87][note 17]

Coppola received a similar level of acclaim for her screenplay and direction. Kenneth Turan of the Los Angeles Times commented that Lost in Translation was "tart and sweet, unmistakably funny and exceptionally well observed—[which] marks ... Coppola as a mature talent with a distinctive sensibility and the means to express it".[88] Much of the praise was directed specifically at her attention to qualities of subtlety and atmosphere; David Rooney of Variety praised the film as "a mood piece", adding that its "deft balance of humor and poignancy makes it both a pleasurable and melancholy experience".[89] Likewise, Salon critic Stephanie Zacharek lauded Coppola as a "stealth dramatist" whose understated narrative style made for an artful depiction of emotion; she praised Lost in Translation as an intimate story that marks Coppola as an exceptional filmmaker.[90]

Praise was also offered for Johansson's performance as Charlotte; Rooney commented that she "gives a smartly restrained performance as an observant, questioning woman with a rich interior life",[89] and Turan added that Johansson "makes what could have been an overly familiar characterization come completely alive".[88]

Lost in Translation was listed as a best film of the year by more than 235 critics[91] and has appeared on other "best of" lists in the years after its release. Paste ranked it number seven on its list of "The 50 Best Movies of the 2000s",[92] Entertainment Weekly ranked it number nine on its list of the decade's top ten,[93] and the film was ranked number 22 on a 2016 list of the BBC's 100 Greatest Films of the 21st Century, based on a poll of 177 critics.[94]

Controversy

While not a topic of most reviews, Lost in Translation received some charges of Orientalist racial stereotyping in its depiction of Japan.[95] The filmmaker E. Koohan Paik argued that the film's comedy "is rooted entirely in the 'otherness' of the Japanese people", and that the story fails to offer balanced characterizations of the Japanese, adding that "it is ... the shirking of responsibility to depict them as full human beings, either negative or positive, which constitutes discrimination, or racism".[96] Similarly, the artist Kiku Day charged in The Guardian that "[t]here is no scene where the Japanese are afforded a shred of dignity. The viewer is sledgehammered into laughing at these small, yellow people and their funny ways".[97] Prior to the film's release in Japan, local distributors were reported to have concern about how it would be received there,[98] and the film was ultimately met with criticism in some Japanese reviews; among them, critic Yoshiro Tsuchiya of Yomiuri Shimbun wrote that Coppola's representation of Japan was "outrageously biased and banal".[99] Perceptions of stereotyping also led to a campaign against the film by an Asian American organization that urged members of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences to vote against it at the 76th Academy Awards.[100]

The film scholar Homay King argues that while the film ultimately does little to counter Orientalist stereotypes, it fails to establish the perspective from which Japanese representations are made, writing that "the film [does not] sufficiently clarify that its real subject is not Tokyo itself, but Western perceptions of Tokyo. ... When Japan appears superficial, inappropriately erotic, or unintelligible, we are never completely sure whether this vision belongs to Coppola, to her characters, or simply to a Hollywood cinematic imaginary".[101] Moreover, Geoff King maintains that while depictions such as Charlotte's alienation from experiences like ikebana are evidence that the film abstains from the Orientalist "mythology of Japanese tradition as source of solace", the film often situates Japan as a source of "difference" for the characters by relying on crude jokes and stereotypes of Japanese people as "crazy" or "extreme".[102] Coppola reported being surprised by such criticism, saying, "I think if everything's based on truth you can make fun, have a little laugh, but also be respectful of a culture. I just love Tokyo and I'm not mean-spirited".[39]

Accolades

Main article: List of accolades received by Lost in Translation (film)

Lost in Translation received awards and nominations in a variety of categories, particularly for Coppola's direction and screenwriting, as well as the performances of Murray and Johansson. At the 76th Academy Awards, it won Best Original Screenplay (Coppola) and the film received three further nominations for Best Picture, Best Director (Coppola), and Best Actor (Murray).[103] The film garnered three Golden Globe Awards from five nominations: Best Motion Picture – Musical or Comedy, Best Actor – Motion Picture Musical or Comedy, and Best Screenplay.[104] At the 57th British Academy Film Awards, Lost in Translation won three awards: Best Actor in a Leading Role, Best Actress in a Leading Role (Johansson), and Best Editing.[105]

Lost in Translation also received awards from various foreign award ceremonies, film festivals, and critics' organizations. These include Best American Film at the Bodil Awards,[106] Best Foreign Film at the César Awards,[107] and Best Foreign Film at the Film Critics Circle of Australia,[108] French Syndicate of Cinema Critics,[109] and Deutscher Filmpreis,[110] as well as the Nastro d'Argento for Best Foreign Director.[111] The film also won the Independent Spirit Award for Best Film,[112] Best Film – Comedy or Musical at the Satellite Awards,[113] and two prizes at the Venice International Film Festival.[114][3] From critics' organizations, Lost in Translation received awards in the Best Film category from the San Francisco Film Critics Circle,[115] the Toronto Film Critics Association,[116] and the Vancouver Film Critics Circle.[117]

Notes

The film has been noted for its resistance to any single genre classification. While it has been labeled in terms such as "romantic comedy", the film has been identified for integrating elements from multiple genres, including romance, comedy, and drama. For one discussion of Lost in Translation's position between genres, see King 2010, pp. 60–75.

Lambert was an actual performer in the bar at the Park Hyatt Tokyo. Coppola saw her sing "Scarborough Fair" at the hotel a year before filming and later induced a manager to help identify her so Coppola could cast her. Lambert performed the same song in the film.[6]

This scene is an homage to a Suntory commercial Coppola's father, Francis Ford Coppola, shot with Akira Kurosawa in the 1970s.[10] Coppola said that like Bob, Murray did not understand what the man playing the director was saying. She remarked that "I like the fact that the American actors don't really know what's going on, just like the characters."[9]

Some commentators have described Tokyo itself as a third major character in the film. For examples, see San Filippo 2003, p. 28, and Plate 2004, para. 4.

Coppola has acknowledged her appreciation for "meandering mood pieces"[16] and cited influences for Lost in Translation from films such as L'Avventura, La Dolce Vita,[6] and In the Mood for Love.[28] La Dolce Vita is briefly featured by Coppola in a scene in which Bob and Charlotte are watching the film on television while drinking sake.

Johansson was initially apprehensive about wearing sheer panties for the shot, but she conceded after Coppola showed her what they looked like by modeling them personally.[30] Johansson said that a male director would not have been able to convince her to wear them.[31]

For examples, see Kennedy 2010, pp. 46–47, San Filippo 2003, p. 26, and Haslem 2004.

For example, see Smith, Paul Julian (2004). "Tokyo Drifters". Sight & Sound. Vol. 14, no. 1. p. 13.

Coppola has spoken favorably about her personal experiences staying at the hotel. She has described the locale as a "silent floating island" within the "chaotic" city environment of Tokyo,[36] and she has named it one of her "favorite places in the world".[17]

After its release, Coppola called Lost in Translation a "valentine" to Tokyo[40] and cited a desire to portray what she liked about the city as one reason for making the film.[36]

A feature film script is typically 90–120 pages.[45]

One example includes the sequence featuring Charlotte walking through Shibuya Crossing. When Coppola noticed that rain had made the area look hazy and atmospheric, she scrapped filming plans in a nearby arcade to shoot the sequence.[8]

Other examples of significant improvisation during shooting include the scenes that occur in the karaoke box[8] and sushi restaurant.[17]

"(What's So Funny 'Bout) Peace, Love, and Understanding" was chosen for Bob to highlight his position in an older generation, "Brass in Pocket" was chosen for Charlotte to show her playful side, and "More Than This" was chosen extemporaneously by Coppola and Murray during shooting, after the two discovered they had a mutual affinity for Roxy Music.[16]

For one example of a magazine article cited by Focus as being part of this campaign, see Hirschberg 2003.[68]

"Wide release" is defined here as crossing the 600-theater threshold.

In the bonus features of the film's 2004 DVD, Murray called Lost in Translation his favorite film that he has appeared in.

References

Citations

"Interpreter's notes". The Japan Times. April 14, 2004. Archived from the original on January 8, 2019. Retrieved August 8, 2020.

"Lost in Translation". British Board of Film Classification. Retrieved August 13, 2023. Note: Select the "Cinema" and "Industry details" tabs.

"Lost in Translation (2003)". American Film Institute. Archived from the original on July 5, 2020. Retrieved June 8, 2020.

Haslem, Wendy (April 2004). "Neon Gothic: Lost in Translation". Senses of Cinema (31). Archived from the original on September 11, 2019. Retrieved June 1, 2020. With Coppola's latest film conventions are revised and consequently the expectations of the audience are challenged.

Olsen, Mark (January 2004). "Sofia Coppola: Cool and the gang". Sight & Sound. Vol. 14, no. 1. p. 15.

Allen, Greg (August 31, 2003). "Mafia Princess: An Interview with Sofia Coppola". Greg.org. Archived from the original on October 12, 2003. Retrieved May 3, 2020.

Murray, Rebecca. "Interview with Bill Murray". About. Archived from the original on October 24, 2005. Retrieved June 1, 2020.

Thompson, Anne (Fall 2003). "Tokyo Story". Filmmaker. Archived from the original on June 11, 2020. Retrieved May 3, 2020.

Rich, Motoko (September 21, 2003). "What Else Was Lost In Translation". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 4, 2020. Retrieved June 1, 2020.

Grove, Martin A. (August 15, 2003). "Word is terrific for Coppola's 'Translation'". The Hollywood Reporter.

Rogers 2018, p. 73.

Wong 2009, p. 133.

Plate 2004, para. 3.

King 2010, p. 104.

Cardullo 2004, p. 464.

Chumo, Peter N. II (January–February 2004). "Honoring the Little Moments: Lost in Translation". Creative Screenwriting. Vol. 11, no. 1. Archived from the original on October 13, 2016. Retrieved May 7, 2020.

Mitchell, Wendy (February 4, 2004). "Sofia Coppola Talks About 'Lost In Translation,' Her Love Story That's Not 'Nerdy'". IndieWire. Archived from the original on August 13, 2019. Retrieved May 3, 2020.

King 2010, p. 127.

McGowan 2007, p. 62.

McGowan 2007, p. 54.

Bolton 2011, pp. 126–127.

King 2010, p. 76.

King 2010, p. 82.

King 2010, p. 80.

King 2010, pp. 81–82.

Vineberg, Steve (October 17, 2003). "Jet lag". The Christian Century. Vol. 120, no. 21. p. 60. Retrieved June 1, 2020.

Interview 2003, p. 56.

Crabtree, Sheigh (September 10, 2003). "Editor Flack in Fashion for Coppola's 'Lost' Pic". The Hollywood Reporter.

Diaconescu, Sorina (September 7, 2003). "An upstart, casual but confident". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved May 3, 2020.

Vernon, Polly (December 28, 2003). "Scarlett fever". The Guardian. Archived from the original on July 11, 2019. Retrieved May 3, 2020.

Hirschberg, Lynn (August 31, 2003). "The Coppola Smart Mob". The New York Times Magazine. Archived from the original on July 22, 2017. Retrieved May 3, 2020.

Stern, Marlow (September 12, 2013). "Sofia Coppola Discusses 'Lost in Translation' on Its 10th Anniversary". The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on January 14, 2020. Retrieved May 7, 2020.

San Filippo 2003, p. 26.

King 2010, pp. 1–2.

Kennedy 2010, p. 45.

"Lost In Translation". Focus Features. Archived from the original on October 1, 2003. Retrieved May 3, 2020.

Meyer, Carla (September 20, 2003). "Sofia Coppola has a little humor and, now, a big film. Father Francis and husband Spike? Not a factor. / Director-writer's sophomore effort translates into growing respect". San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on March 10, 2016. Retrieved May 3, 2020.

Topel, Fred (September 23, 2003). "Sofia Coppola on 'Lost in Translation'". Screenwriter's Monthly. Retrieved May 3, 2020.

Morrow, Fiona (January 2, 2004). "Sofia Coppola: Hollywood princess". The Independent. Retrieved May 3, 2020.

Calhoun, Dave (Autumn–Winter 2003). "Watching Bill Murray Movies". Another Magazine (5): 100.

Hundley, Jessica (September 11, 2003). "An invisible role". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved May 3, 2020.

Peretz, Evgenia (September 2006). "Something About Sofia". Vanity Fair. Retrieved May 3, 2020.

Betts, Kate (September 8, 2003). "Sofia's Choice". Time. Retrieved May 3, 2020.

Harris, Dana (October 12, 2003). "New film legends of the fall". Variety. Archived from the original on April 3, 2019. Retrieved May 3, 2020.

Hilliard, Robert L. (August 10, 2011). Writing for Television, Radio, and New Media (10th ed.). Cengage Learning. p. 403. ISBN 978-1439082713.

Brownfield, Paul (February 29, 2004). "What about Bill?". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved May 3, 2020.

Clark, John (November 9, 2003). "Young heart and old soul". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved May 3, 2020.

King 2010, p. 8.

"Our Own Private Hollywood". Elle. October 7, 2010. Retrieved May 3, 2020.

'Lost' on Location (Lost in Translation DVD Extra). Focus Features. February 3, 2004.

Acord 2004a, p. 22.

Acord 2004a, p. 21.

Acord, Lance (January 2004b). "Channeling Tokyo for 'Lost in Translation'". American Cinematographer. Vol. 85, no. 1. pp. 123–124.

Acord 2004a, p. 23.

Acord 2004a, p. 19.

Acord 2004a, p. 24.

"Lost in Translation OST". Metacritic. Retrieved May 20, 2020.

Dansby, Andrew (September 24, 2003). "Kevin Shields Found on 'Lost'". Rolling Stone. Retrieved May 20, 2020.

White, Michael. "My Bloody Valentine's Kevin Shields: An Enigma Emerges". Exclaim!. Archived from the original on September 16, 2019. Retrieved May 20, 2020.

Keast, James (October 1, 2003). "Lost In Translation: Sofia Coppola's Journey Into Culture Clash". Exclaim!. Archived from the original on September 16, 2019. Retrieved May 20, 2020.

"From My Bloody Valentine to 'Lost in Translation'". NPR (Audio). September 15, 2003. Archived from the original on February 4, 2020. Retrieved May 20, 2020.

King 2010, p. 115.

King 2010, pp. 115–116.

King 2010, pp. 116–119.

King 2010, p. 117.

Harris, Dana; Dunkley, Cathy (February 25, 2003). "Focus frames 'Lost' deal at finish of AFM". Variety. Retrieved May 9, 2020.

King 2010, p. 16.

Grove, Martin A. (October 10, 2003). "Focus Heads Focus on 'Translation' Success". The Hollywood Reporter.

King 2010, pp. 24–25.

Brooks, Brian (September 16, 2003). "The Land of the Rising Box Office Shines Bright for 'Lost in Translation'". IndieWire. Archived from the original on May 28, 2018. Retrieved May 10, 2020.

King 2010, pp. 16–17.

King 2010, p. 17.

"Lost in Translation". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved July 4, 2020.

Brooks, Brian (September 23, 2003). "'Scarface' Lashes the B.O.; Docs Continue Strong". IndieWire. Retrieved May 10, 2020.

King 2010, p. 22.

"Lost in Translation Details and Credits". Metacritic. Archived from the original on August 13, 2018. Retrieved May 10, 2020.

Lost in Translation (DVD). Focus Features. February 3, 2004.

Saccone, Melinda (February 15, 2004). "Coppola's Oscar-Lauded Film Translates Well to Video". Video Store Magazine. Vol. 26, no. 7. p. 18.

Hettrick, Scott (February 17, 2004). "'Lost' translates to DVD, bigscreen". Variety. Retrieved May 10, 2020.

"Lost in Translation HD DVD Review". High-Def Digest. May 31, 2007. Archived from the original on December 13, 2017. Retrieved May 10, 2020.

Miller, Gordon S. (January 4, 2011). "Lost in Translation Blu-ray Review". High-Def Digest. Archived from the original on February 18, 2017. Retrieved May 10, 2020.

King 2010, pp. 28–29.

"Lost in Translation (2003)". Rotten Tomatoes. Archived from the original on June 5, 2020. Retrieved July 10, 2020.

"Lost in Translation (2003)". Metacritic. Archived from the original on June 17, 2020. Retrieved May 12, 2020.

Edelstein, David (September 11, 2003). "Prisoner of Japan". Slate. Retrieved May 12, 2020.

Schwarzbaum, Lisa (September 11, 2003). "Lost in Translation". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on December 6, 2019. Retrieved May 12, 2020.

Mitchell, Elvis (September 12, 2003). "An American in Japan, Making a Connection". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 23, 2013. Retrieved May 12, 2020.

Turan, Kenneth (September 12, 2003). "Bill at his best". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on April 3, 2020. Retrieved May 12, 2020.

Rooney, David (August 31, 2003). "Lost in Translation". Variety. Archived from the original on July 14, 2018. Retrieved May 12, 2020.

Zacharek, Stephanie (September 13, 2003). "Lost in Translation". Salon. Archived from the original on July 3, 2020. Retrieved June 20, 2020.

Grove, Martin A. (January 16, 2004). "Academy Members Have Thrown Dice or Thrown Away Votes". The Hollywood Reporter.

"The 50 Best Movies of the 2000s". Paste. November 3, 2009. Archived from the original on May 13, 2020. Retrieved May 12, 2020.

"10 Best Movies of the Decade!". Entertainment Weekly. December 3, 2009. Archived from the original on June 15, 2020. Retrieved June 15, 2020.

"The 21st Century's 100 greatest films". BBC. August 19, 2016. Archived from the original on June 11, 2020. Retrieved June 15, 2020.

King 2010, p. 132.

Paik, E. Koohan (November 2003). "Is 'Lost in Translation' Racist?". ColorLines RaceWire. Archived from the original on April 18, 2005. Retrieved May 25, 2020.

Day, Kiku (January 23, 2004). "Totally lost in translation". The Guardian. Archived from the original on July 2, 2020. Retrieved May 25, 2020.

Rich, Motoko (January 4, 2004). "Land Of the Rising Cliché". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 18, 2019. Retrieved May 25, 2020.

Cited in Musetto, V.A. (May 21, 2004). "'Lost in Transition' – Japan Critics Rip Flick". New York Post. Archived from the original on October 30, 2017. Retrieved May 25, 2020.

Wright, George (February 27, 2004). "Hit film gets lost in racism row". The Guardian. Archived from the original on August 16, 2019. Retrieved May 25, 2020.

King 2005, pp. 45–46.

King 2010, pp. 130–132.

"76th Academy Awards (2004)". Oscars.org | Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. Archived from the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved May 10, 2020.

"The 61st Annual Golden Globe Awards". Hollywood Foreign Press Association. Archived from the original on December 20, 2016. Retrieved May 10, 2020.

"Film in 2004". British Academy of Film and Television Arts (BAFTA). Archived from the original on November 13, 2017. Retrieved May 10, 2020.

"2005 Årets vindere" [2005 Winners of the year] (in Danish). Danish Film Critics Association. Archived from the original on March 16, 2016. Retrieved July 4, 2020.

"Palmares: César 2005: récompenses, nominations" [Palmares: César 2005: awards, nominations]. AlloCiné (in French). Archived from the original on September 22, 2016. Retrieved May 10, 2020.

"Awards Archive". Film Critics Circle of Australia. Archived from the original on January 25, 2014. Retrieved May 10, 2020.

"Prix SFCC de la Critique 2004" [2004 SFCC Critics' Award] (in French). French Syndicate of Cinema Critics. Archived from the original on April 11, 2019. Retrieved July 4, 2020.

"Deutsche Filmpreise von 1951 Bis Heute: 2004" [German Film Awards from 1951 to Today: 2004] (in German). Deutsche Filmakademie. Archived from the original on September 23, 2015. Retrieved May 10, 2020.

"2004 (Albo d'oro)" (in Italian). Italian National Syndicate of Film Journalists. Archived from the original on July 4, 2020. Retrieved July 4, 2020.

Munoz, Lorenza (February 29, 2004). "'Lost in Translation' Captures Top Prizes at Spirit Awards". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on March 6, 2016. Retrieved May 10, 2020.

"2004 (8th Annual Satellite Awards)". International Press Academy. Archived from the original on December 18, 2008. Retrieved May 10, 2020.

"Official Awards of the 60th Mostra". Venice Biennale. September 6, 2003. Archived from the original on June 23, 2004. Retrieved July 4, 2020.

"2003 San Francisco Film Critics Circle Awards". San Francisco Film Critics Circle. December 15, 2003. Archived from the original on December 14, 2014. Retrieved May 10, 2020.

"Past Award Winners". Toronto Film Critics Association. May 29, 2014. Archived from the original on July 15, 2015. Retrieved May 10, 2020.

"4th Annual Award Winners". Vancouver Film Critics Circle. February 2, 2004. Archived from the original on April 9, 2019. Retrieved May 10, 2020.

Print sources

Acord, Lance (October 12, 2004a). "Lost in Translation". In Ballinger, Alex (ed.). New Cinematographers. HarperCollins. pp. 19–26. ISBN 978-1856693349.

Bolton, Lucy (July 28, 2011). Film and Female Consciousness: Irigaray, Cinema and Thinking Women. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1137501400.

Cardullo, Bert (Autumn 2004). "Love Story, or Coppola vs. Coppola". The Hudson Review. 57 (3): 463–470. doi:10.2307/4151446. JSTOR 4151446.

Kennedy, Todd (Fall 2010). "Off with Hollywood's Head: Sofia Coppola as Feminine Auteur". Film Criticism. 35 (1): 37–59.

King, Geoff (2010). Lost in Translation. American Indies. Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 978-0748637461.

King, Homay (Fall 2005). "Lost in Translation" (PDF). Film Quarterly. 59 (1): 45–48. doi:10.1525/fq.2005.59.1.45.

McGowan, Todd (2007). "There is Nothing Lost in Translation". Quarterly Review of Film and Video. 24 (1): 53–63. doi:10.1080/10509200500486023. S2CID 191608894.

Plate, S. Brent (April 2004). "Film Review: Lost in Translation". Journal of Religion and Film. 8 (1).

Rogers, Anna (November 29, 2018). Sofia Coppola: The Politics of Visual Pleasure. Berghahn Books. ISBN 978-1785339752.

San Filippo, Maria (Winter 2003). "Lost in Translation". Cineaste. Vol. 29, no. 1. pp. 26–28.

"The Co-Conspirators". Interview. Vol. 33, no. 9. October 2003. pp. 54–60.

Wong, Nicholas Y.B. (2009). "Loving You by Not Falling in Love: The Postmodern Representation of Love in Chunking Express and Lost in Translation". Screen Education. No. 53. pp. 131–137.

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Lost in Translation (film).

Wikiquote has quotations related to Lost in Translation.

Official website

Lost in Translation at IMDb

Lost in Translation at AllMovie

Lost in Translation at Rotten Tomatoes

Last edited 5 hours ago by Renerpho

...

Did you know ...

Entrance to the Fulton Street station

... that before the Fulton Street station (entrance pictured) was renovated in the 2010s, a New York Times reporter said the station "might be a good spot for M. C. Escher to set up an easel"?

... that a stamp depicting an elephant compelled Plácido Ramón de Torres to flee Italy for his native Spain?

... that an Iowa TV station operates from a former McDonald's restaurant?

... that after breaking up, Piri and Tommy Villiers released a song about wanting to be treated nicely in a relationship?

... that National Football League player Jacob Sykes took college courses in sixth grade and assisted in teaching college courses in seventh grade?

... that although Kississing Lake is threatened by water contaminated with tailings, it is the main resource for nearby residents?

... that about 30 cases of Hanhart syndrome were reported between 1932 and 1991?

... that Diamandi Djuvara's last stand against the Ottoman army in Wallachia resulted in the Ottomans collecting 138 human tongues as war trophies?