Review Detail of southgamez in One Piece Thundergod Marine

I differ from that, I tell you because I used it in other sites to see it in advance and the translation was crap in canbio, you can see that DarkShadow95 has put effort and dedication

still, the fact that there is no background is garbage

Was there a background chapter in the original? I'm genuinely curious since you dislike it so much. If there wasn't then I don't think that you can translate something that isn't there.

idk, but it doesnt take much to make a background chapter

Well if doesn't take much then make it yourself and imagine that it's how he got into One Piece.

i cant make a background with no info on just exactly how he came to one piece, did he die? was hesent through some kind of future technology? the first chapter was unclear as it sounds like multiple people have been world hopping

Then how excatly a translator supposed to make it?

if he's translating, then he has more insight than the readers, and the first chapter seems like it cut out a big part of chapter 1

Uh huh. And why, if original author even wrote a backstory, should it be relocated to a place that you like? Also you did not try to read a machine translation very often do you? Because machine translation of this novel that I tried to read on comrademao is way worse than this.

This is a review of the fanfic, not just the translation right? Fully reasonable to bring up things that seem to be lacking in the story, or if it is very jumpy from scene to scene (which I also find annoying)

Really? Because from what I read it starts from reviewing translation and only mentions the fanfic itself like an afterthought.

Nothing wrong with reviewing both. OP is saying it makes no sense, like its missing parts. If it doesn't read well then i'm not sure why you so adamantly defending it, the guy can have an opinion so being a whiteknight.

Why are you playing a white knight for OP then? My problem was with his statement that not having a backstory is a translator problem. If he made a distinction between translation problems and the lack of backstory as two separate subjects I wouldn't even care. But OP wanted for translator to write a character backstory because he felt confused?

I am just saying that it is valid it critique the book itself in the review, so your "can't translate something that isn't there" comment is a bit random (since the complaint isn't about the translator) . I didn't read the review thinking that the comments about how the story was written, was directed to the translator (only first part mention the translation)

Yes, the first part with the whole missing backstory bit. That was what I focused on and didn't really address anything else in the review. So again I don't see your problem with me.

We just read it differently then, I assumed that he complained towards the author that backstory was missing while you seem to read it as the person blaming the translator for stuff. My point being that there 1: might not exist a backstory chapter and 2: that is bad and the authors fault, hench your comment thst "he can't translate what doesn't exist" was meaningless since you were defending someone who wasn't being attacked to begin with. But there is no problem, we don't know what the reviewer meant so any way could be "correct"

Yeah well, putting the complaint about quality of translation in the same sentence as a complaint about lack of backstory seem to imply that they're connected. At least that's how I see it.

a bueno

it not like i read about rowan in earth are we. so chill it not like the world gonna end

the problem was that he was complaining to the translator, not the original author. The translator only corrects the language from the Chinese to English translation so that it is easily understood by other readers outside. he wouldn't care about mc's background. in MTL there are novels, and to be honest the language is very messy. So, it's funny to complain about MC's background to Translator.