The Closing Argument

"Morality, morality, morality. That is what many base their reasoning on, despite knowing their decision won't have any significant impact. They try to prioritize the good over the bad, hoping they can make a difference. However, what happens when the evil they are attempting to morally banish decides to fight back? What occurs when the most dangerous killer also ensures there's a way to evade all forms of trouble, using morality as a smoke screen?

What happens when society chooses to judge a serial killer instead of taking the necessary steps and putting them six feet under? Why not meet greed with greed and chaos with chaos? Why not ensure there is nothing like morality when dealing with a killer? Why not make sure there is no way out for such vile beings?" Eirian commenced his closing argument with a series of questions, questioning the inclination of humans to inject morality into situations that demand decisive actions.