St_Pat
Every fanfic is wish-fulfilment. Fav. Genre: Grimdark, LitRPG, Reincarnation, Self-insert, Strategy. Fav. MC Char: Amoral, Apathetic, Cunning, Perfectionist, Pragmatic, Ruthless, Scheming, Secretive
de lectura
910
Leer libros
Now, that's some talk! Not getting pushed and pulled on someones's whim. Wish MC had such mentality full time.
What's with MC's moral compass? I still can't understand it. Is being selective with morals even justifiable?
This old man is speaking like he used to give hugs in battles before he killed his son's killer.
Okay. I have crossed 50 chapters in reading, and I am happy to say that MC has gained 'backbone' and is training! There are some other developments too which i won't spoil. Now, all I am hoping is that, MC doesn't hesitate to get his hands dirty, else it won't be easy to get strong. Road to Power is paved by struggle after all.
It is just me who thinks that MC is giving all the wrong signals with his mentality? Is MC even man? Then again even females have strong fortitude in this world. So, MC behaving like who is very short on IQ is unnerving me.
This MC is seriously sus. Cant' even use his brain?
Messed up 'Morals'. MC is fine with indulging in adultery and harem which is wrong, evil and crime according to 'Morals' and 'Laws' of majority of countries. Yet, when it comes to killing or some other 'grey' area like abandoning someone, then, he behaves like he is some Monk or Saint. What kind of f*cked up morals are these. He even shows hesitation in harming and fighting someone to defend himself when he has got second chance at life. Shouldn't he hold his second chance at life with both hands and fight for it. He shows repulsion towards training and gaining strength. How is he gonna defend himself when he has no will to get strong knowing there are godly forces who order him. I have read at most 50 chapters, and came to conclusion that MC is sus, and might prefer being SPOON FED by system his whole life while he indulged in adultery and his harem conquest. If MC is fine with 'dark' side of the 'Morality' like 'adultery' and 'harem' then he should be fine with 'killing' or atleast 'harming'. Being selective in 'morals' is HYPOCRISY!
This novel has too much morality and they are f*cked up one. MC is against killing, hurting, abandoning etc, yet, he is fine with adultery. Adultery is evil and crime according to morals, yet whole plot of this novel is adultery and harem. Then, what's wrong with killing?
This guy is sus. Too much morals for someone who indulges in adultery. What kind of messed up morals are these. He doesn't like to hurt and fight even when he got second chance at life?
Agreed.
Sorry about that. I am just used to distinction between thoughts and dialogues while reading. Anything inbetween double quotations I take it as dialogues/speaking. That's what most authors use to distinguish dialogues. And for thoughts, they use single quotations.
If so, then I must have misunderstood it for something else. My bad. It's just that, I am so used to the different quotations (single quotation for thought and double quotation for dialogues) use for distinction between thoughts and dialogues/speaking that anything inbetween double quotations I take it as dialogues.
Agreed. When there are Knights and others, so many kills single-handedly seem far-fetched.
Whole chapter was confusing. Can't even tell which are 'thoughts' and 'dialogues'. Why not distinguish both with single and double quotation? It is confusing because, if MC is talking then, why can't anyone beside him hear it. What about movement of mouth? Can't they see it?
Is he speaking out loud? If yes, then why can't woman hear him talking? And if this is thought, then you should distinguish between 'thoughts' and 'dialogues'. Maybe use single quotation for thoughts and double quotation for dialogues.