On account of criticism

Everyone does not like being criticized. However, without criticism, there is no human growth. If the criticism is constructive, it gives development. But on the Internet for the most part this is not criticism, but haters ...

In totalitarian systems, usually the haters themselves from this system, on a paid basis, are engaged in the fight against those who are not in the format.

The Internet is to some extent a free zone and a totalitarian one. Hiding in the fog of obscurity, people lose their "coast" as the Russians say. That is, they lose touch with the real world, forgetting about network ethics. Although when they agree to access the Internet, they agree to accept the rules that state that users must adhere to network ethics. But these rules are rarely followed. Since there is no cyber police on network ethics, every Internet user communicates with others as he can, based on his culture of communication. Some respect the interlocutor, others do not.

This is reflected in the critics. If you as the author are immediately approached from the words of abuse, you will no longer regard your reader as an adequate person.

If the conversation begins with pointing out errors and possible ways to eliminate them, this reader is admirable.

This does not mean that the author is not ready for criticism, just the author is accustomed to the cultural dialogue. A different kind of speech in him causes rejection.

If you objectively evaluate the work of the author, then from the conditional 10 points I would give 3 or 4 honestly. As with the wrong grammar, of course, a lot is lost for the reader. But as long as the author can write 100 percent correct in English, time will pass - a year or even two. And the information with which he would like to share will remain unread by readers ...

Then there is a dialema ... writing poorly or not writing at all? I choose the first!

1) When writing a text, there is the likelihood of learning the very grammar, corrections, as experience is gained

2) Share at least in a truncated form with ideas, in the hope that an editor or another author will appear who will take the idea and write a more fascinating novel and will not make it premium

3) Popularization of the theme - the Silk Road and the Farmersta, is already a big breakthrough for the author

4) To develop the habit of writing 3000 words every 2 days.

5) The ability to perceive new information and criticism positively.

These are the thoughts I had.

At the expense of English grammar, I will try to return to it again, but so far there is no particular desire.