webnovel

overview of local government in Nigeria

1.0 Introduction

2.0

In this unit, we shall examine the meaning of local government from different

Perspectives; the reasons for creating of local government as well as the importance of

Local government. We are able to establish that local governments are developmental

Intermediary between grassroots people and national scheme of things. It is a system

Of government that fosters democracy. It is grassroots – based consisting of small

Units of local communities upon which political power are developed to cater for then

Needs. It engenders greater participation of the people in the process of government. It

Is designed to serve as a viable instrument for repeal and even development of local

Government as their areas serve as units for sharing government amenities and offices

Eg sitting of government establishment, appointment of commissioners, ministers and

Sharing of federation accounts etc.

2.0 Objectives

By the end of this unit, the one should be able to

1 Define the term local government

2 Explain the importance of local government

3 Discuss the characteristics of local government

3.0 Meaning of Local Government

The term local government has been defined in various ways by public

Administrators, political scientist, writers and scholars According to Ogunna (1988), it

Is a political authority, purposely created by the state government under a law by

Which local communities within a definite area are organized to manage their own

Affairs within the limit of the law under which the authority is created. In the words of

Okoli (1983), it is a process of devolution of power to the local authority to provide

Services of local nature. Alao (1986), viewed it as a government of grassroots which is

Designed to serve as "instrument of rural transformation". In his own contributions,

Golding (1981), viewed it as a political authority set up by a nation or state as

Subordinate authority for the purpose of dispersing or decentralizing political power.

This idea of local government by Awa (1981), has been reinforced by the Federal

Republic of Nigerian Guidelines for local government in Nigeria which elaborately

Defined local government as "government at local level exercised through

Representative councils established by law to exercise specific powers within defined

Areas. These powers should give the council substantial control over local affairs,

(including staffing) and institutional and financial powers to initiate and direct the

Provision of services and to determine and implement projects so as to complement

The activities of the state and federal governments in their areas and to ensure, through

Devolution of functions to these councils and through the active participation of the

People and their traditional institutions, that local initiative and response to local needs

And conditions are maximized" Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Local government therefore plays crucial role in rural as well as urban

Development the world over. The importance of local government in rural

Development process made AbubakarRimi to remark as far back as 1978 thus, "Local

Government is the most important government of our land. The local government is

The nearest a 9nd most immediate government for the man. The man in my village

Does not care about who the president is. He does not even care about who the

Governor of Kano State is. He cares only about those who are counselors and

Chairman of his local government" (constituent Assembly: 1978:994). Local

Government is therefore, a powerful instrument of rural and urban development.

Consequently, if appropriately structured, based on adequacy of units;

Adequately funded, sufficiently staffed with well qualified and continuously trained,

Motivated and dedicated personnel, enjoy a measure of freedom from the state

Government, it will give effect to mass participation of the people in the process of

Government as well as serve as a spring signboard for local participation and rural

Development. Local government is therefore designed to achieve multi-dimensional

Goals of economic, social, cultural and political development. It is form of government

Most desired all over the world today due to its therapeutic cleansing effect on rural

Development problems.

3.0.1 Reasons for the Establishment of Local Government

According to Ezeani (2005:257) there are a number of reasons why local

Government are created and they are as follow:

- To assist the central or state government to maintain law and order.

- To complement the efforts of central or federal or state government in the

Provision of series of services within their areas of authority. Local government all

Over the world is seen as an efficient agent for providing services that are local in

Character. According to Mackenzie (1961:14) in Ezeani (2006) „local government

Exists to provide services and it must be judged by its success in providing services

Up to a standard measurable by a national inspectorate. It is argued that because of

Its closeness to an area, local government can provide certain services far more

Effectively and efficiently than the central or federal government (Ezeani 2004:40).

Local Government particularly in developing countries is seen as a veritable

Instrument for rural development. Consequently, all over the world, local

Governments have been assigned some functions under the law they include;

- To assist the central and state governments carry out their functions and policies,

Especially those areas that require local knowledge and participation for successful

Execution.

- To make appropriate services and development activities responsive to local

Wishes and initiatives by devolving or delegating them to local representative

Bodies.

- To assist the Central or Federal and State Government in resolving conflicts in the

Rural areas.

- To sensitize and mobilize the various communities in their areas of authority in

Order to get involved in the overall development of their areas.

- To facilitate the exercise of democratic self-government close to the grassroots of

Our society and to encourage initiative and leadership potential.

- Local governments act as a medium through which the federal or state government

Promotes mutual understanding and meaningful communication between people

Who are resident in the rural areas (Olisa, 1990:93).

Other rationales for the creation of the local government according to the

National Guidelines for Local Government Reform (1976:1) include;

- To provide a training ground for democracy. Local government serves to promote

Democracy at the grassroots. This is the view espoused by the democratic

Participatory school which argued that local government functions to bring about

Democracy and to afford opportunities for political participation to the citizen as

Well as to educate and socialize him politically (Ezeani 2004:37).

- To make appropriate services and development activities responsive to local

Wishes and initiative by developing or delegating them to local representative

Bodies and

- To mobilization material resources through the involvement of members of the

Public in their development

Acting as a veritable instrument for development (Ola 1984:14) The local

government can do a lot to promote human development index which is very low

compared to that of other countries, the roles of local government towards the

development process includes;

a. Helping to inculcate in people positive citizenship attitudes, such as

consideration, self-control, community responsibility and identity.

b. Providing basic community services which is both to improve the quality of

people lives and enable the community attract economic activities. Such basic

community services includes, primary health care, basic primary education,

provision of basic infrastructure etc and

c. Helping people, especially in the rural areas to organize themselves for the

mobilization and effective management of community resources and central

government programmes respectively.

According to Afegbua (2010) Local government is conceived as a platform for

political education, a forum for breeding politicians; and a training ground for national

politicians as a means of gaining access to power, pressure and control as the case

maybe. Furthermore, Chukwuemeka (2003:195) posited that the basic reasons that

justify the creation of local government system are:

1. Local government is more responsive to the needs of the citizens than large units

of government.

2. It is the government at the grass root and near enough to the people, and

therefore being able to articulate and tackle the problems of the citizenry.

3. The existence of local government recognizes the superior capacity of the local

people to understand and conduct their own local affairs. The people themselves

are able to secure a closer adaptation of public services to local needs than they

to the central or state governments, looking at the locality from afar.

4. Local governments encourage people to become involved in the lives of their

communities.

5. Naturally, people tend to resist imposition from above (outside) but they tend to

defend what they themselves have decided upon the way people look at the

command from an outside body than what they have decided to do by

themselves.

6. Local Government is a form of decentralization under the centralization of power

and foundation in the centre which might be tended to high handedness of

government and deposition.

7. Local Government is intended to relieve the central/state government of

excessive amount of business from the center and thus, decongest the national

and state governments.

8. Local government upholds personal liberty.

9. Local government is an instrument of political education, providing a form of

socialization for political space for its participants.

10.Local government helps to pool resources together at the local level for the

provision of a wide range of essential social services.

3.0.2 The Importance of Local Government:

Jawaharial Nehru emphasized the importance of local government when he

said that "local self-government is and must be the basis of any true system of

democracy. Democracy at the top may not be a success unless you build on this

foundation from below".

Historically too the local government preceded national government when

people started living organized life, they were in small communities. They cooperated

with each other in organizing many of their affairs like growing food, looking after the

cattle, organizing defence against the enemies and beasts etc. They became the selfgoverning communities. With the passage of time, the communities became bigger

and bigger and some of their functions were taken over by the larger communities, i.e.

the national government. Defence, administration of justice, policing are some of such

instances. Nevertheless the basic and primary needs of the people continued to be

looked after by the local authority. But it does not mean that the emergence of the

national government has decreased the importance of the local government. The fact

is that the concept of welfare state has enlarged the scope of functions of the

government as a whole, both at the national and local levels. If the number of functions of the national government has increased, so has the number of functions of

the local government.

The existence and functioning of local government t grass-root level have

many advantages. That advantage "primarily lies in the convenience at least cost, for

at this level the range of activities and the jurisdiction of work of officials is not as

vast as in a district or a state. As everyone knows everyone else, the chance for fair

and open working are greater. Cases of corruption are few, as no body would like to

be exposed. „Some Community effort and citizen participation in decision-making are

higher and since citizens have a stake, solutions for the subjects handled are likely to

be relevant and more pragmatic".

1. Grass-root Democracy: Local government provides scope for democracy at the

grass-root level. If direct democracy can still be practicable, it is only at this level,

otherwise democracy at the state or national level has become only indirect or

representative type. G.D.H. Cole says that "Democracy is nothing unless it means

….letting the people have their own way not only in the mass by means of an

aggregate vote on nationwide scale, but also in their lesser groups and societies of

which the great society is made up, and through which it is made articulate in such

a way that the less clamorous voices can be heard".

2. Serves as a training school: Local government is an excellent ground for creating

and training future leaders. The participation of people at the local level in the

management of their own affairs, gives them necessary experience to handle

bigger affairs later at the state or national level. Thus the local government serves

as a training school for democracy. The advisory committee of U.S. Commission

on Inter-government Relations rightly remarked, "The counties, cities, towns,

villages and boroughs serve as training schools for the leaders of government, and

in the affairs of local government are tried those who aspire to state and national

offices". Lord Bryce regarded local government as the best school of democracy

and the best guarantee of local government as a general. He said, "The institution

of local government is educative in perhaps a higher degree at least contingently,

than any other part of government. And it must be remembered that there is no other way of brining the mass of citizens into intimate contact with persons

responsible for decisions".

Local government servers not only as a training ground for the politicians to

function at the state and national levels, but also it provides an outlet for competent

and public spirited persons of the locality to render social service to the community. It

is from such a group of experienced and tested persons that there emerge leader who

can take up responsibilities at state and national levels. Therefore local government

ensures a regular flow of talent to higher levels. It is for these reasons that the local

self-government is regarded as the best school of democracy and the best guarantee

for its successes. Many of the Indian leaders of the national movement like MotiLal

Nehru and JawaharLal Nehru, Ferozeshah Mehta and VallabhBhai Patel, Dr. Rajendra

Prasad and Subash Chandra Bose, etc. had risen from the service they rendered in the

local governments.

3. Encourages participation of the people in public affairs: Local government

affords opportunity to the people to participate in public affairs. Democracy no

doubt means government by the people, but it has become impracticable for the

common people to participate in public affairs at the state or national level. The

affairs of the modern state are too complex to understand for an ordinary citizen.

Moreover the affairs at the national level are too far removed to be of much

interest for him. The large size of the modern state is another handicap. On the

other hand, local government is too close to the citizen. It affects his everyday life.

The affairs of the village, the town or the borough are his own affairs, in which he

is naturally interested. Moreover, these are too simple for an ordinary citizen.

Sanitation, need of education for the village or town‟s children, maintenance of

streets and roads, street lighting, management of local markets, etc. are subjects

which he understands. None else than him can know the problems arising in these

matters. None else than him also knows the solutions of these problems. Therefore

he is encouraged to participate in the management of these affairs.

4. More competent to solve local problems: Modern State is too large in size and

the scope of its functions has expanded in recent times. Therefore it hardly has the

time to attend to the local problems of the people. It is competent to deal with the problems which are common to all the people or which are national in nature like

defence, foreign affairs, currency, communications and international trade etc. But

it is neither competent nor has the knowledge to deal with the local problems of

the people. The local problems vary so much that no single agency can mange

them. The problems of the villages are different from those of the towns. The

problems of desert regions are different from those of mountainous areas. Even the

needs and problems of one village or town will be different from those of the other

village or town. Therefore it is the local government which is present at the spot

which can understand and solve those problems. Local affairs can best be managed

locally. Local affairs are bound to be neglected if they are dealt with by the Central

Government. Local government is preferable precisely because locally elected

institutions employing their own specialist staff are better placed to understand and

interpret both the conditions and the needs of local communities.

5. Local government is economical: It costs the taxpayer much less if his local

affairs are managed by the local government. If these affairs were to be managed

by the Central Government that means that the Central Government will have to

keep a large bureaucracy. It will be a big administrative state. Its agents or

employees serving at the local level will have to be paid at the central rates which

are generally very high. It will make it very expensive and increase the burden on

the taxpayer. On the other hand, the local government can manage these affairs

with the help of locally available specialists or employees who will cost much less.

Thus management of local affairs by the local government results in economy.

Moreover the local government knows that the money being spent is its own

money which has been raised through local sources. Therefore it will try to

economize and avoid wastage.

Also, the people of the local community can keep a watch on the work being

done by the local government and can hold it accountable for any misuse of funds or

financial lapses. The Central Government has no accountability to the local

community; therefore the chances of misuse of funds or wastage are greater if these

affairs were to be managed by it. 6. Reduced the burden of the Central Government: Local government in a way

acts supplementary to the Central Government. No doubt historically the local

government is prior to the state or national government, but with the passage of

time many important functions got transferred to the Central Government. It

resulted in the division of functions – affairs of national importance such as

defence, foreign affairs, currency, communications etc. began to be performed by

the latter, leaving affairs of local interest and importance which required local

knowledge, in the hands of the former. It is useful for both. Since the local

functions are performed by the local government, the Central Government is freed

from that responsibility and burden, consequently it can better concentrate on

affairs of national importance. The local government too knows its area of activity

in which it can develop its competence.

7. Serves as a channel of communication: The local government serves as two-way

channel of communication between itself and the Central Government. "Desires

and aspirations of the local community are articulated and carried upward to the

State Government, and plans and programmes of the State and the Central

Governments flow in the reverse direction. In times of national emergency local

government acts as the field post of the distant Centre, transmits national decisions

to far-flung corners, mobilizes the people for national tasks and keeps the Centre

informed about happenings in the locality."

8. Vital for national progress: Local government promotes diversity of experience

and creative activity through democratic action. Thus it contributes to national

progress through resilience, strength and richness of democracy. Edward Jenks

remarks, "In countries where the organs of local government are under the thumb

of the central authority, although the efficiency of administration may be great, the

political character of the people will be unsatisfactory; it will be apathetic for long

periods and then dangerously excited, with the result of instability and corruption

in the Central Government. On the other hand, a country of strong local

government may be slow to move and blundering in its methods, but it will be a

country of steady progress and of political stability and honesty".

Conclusion

In this unit we have able to establish that local governments the world over is

designed to serve as an instrument for rural development. In federal structure like

ours, local government is the basic unit of democracy; it is the fountain head of

democracy upon which national democracy is established.

5.0 Summary

Local government is a third tier government in Nigeria as well as the closet tier

of government to the people. The guidelines for 1976 Local Government Reform in

Nigeria elaborately describes it as government at the local level exercised through

representative councils established by law to exercise specific powers over local areas.

The Primary Goal of local government is to bring government nearer to the people for

the purpose of maximum participation of rural inhabitants, utilization of local

resources (men and materials) for rapid and even development of local communities.

Next chapter