8 BadHabits Academies: Indebted.

²■ The "academies of bad habits" are of three types in the 'family past' of the antihero: (1) Affliction, (2) Indebted and (3) Bitterness of Spirit. The inhabitants of this town of the Creator to "regain" the status before the Judge, Prophet, and Master XPrays: Sam, 'must go' through:

The XMonk Academy founded by Elcax, husband of Anaxy, and earthly father of: Sam. They are established: three levels, optional, to "be admitted"; as 'XMonk Warrior apprentices', this in "Elcax's Bipolar Multiverse".

These three levels: they were the BadHabits Academies. Let's look at the second:

BadHabits Academy: (2) All Indebted

Unlike the Level 1 Academy: made up of "all those afflicted", which were: "all married couples" due to marital problems, such as: sterility, adultery, separation or divorce, among others.

The Level 2 Academy: made up of "all the indebted" that were: "all the families that sold their children" due to economic and traditional problems; or due to interpersonal conflicts; or for wars without any payment; or by pacts with the Creator.

{(As the case of Anaxy) Who made "a pact" in the presence of the Spirit XPrays, before the prophet Elix, saying: 'Having a son, I give him to the Creator' and your Elix, you will take care of him. [emphasis added: well, Anaxy "did not consult" with her husband Elcax, "the decision to donate" their son to the congregation, reason for which, "they separated", for "commercial matters" but no, they separated because of "marital" problems, well, loving each other 'they had more children'.]}

{XMonk Academy Level 2: (Case of two debtors) Objective: Resemble a King}

In this lesson -Elcax explains-: The objective is to know: How? a King wanted to "do accounts" with 'two of his subjects' from him. -Asking- all the debtors gathered there: Any idea?

-Raising her right hand-: 'one' of the three 'male' brothers that Anaxy had after 'giving in' to her son Elix, who became an Antihero; apart from the 'two' "women" sisters.

-Answered- The King, made 'accounts' with the two debtors of him by means of a "parable".

Good! -It is understood- said, Elix: that I use a parabolic narrative, but: How did he demonstrate it? Don't tell me doing the math, but explain: the story that gives us a message to apply to our lives. -Adding-

Who's turn is to read in class today?

{1st Reading: Part 1}

A debtor appeared, for ten thousand. And since he did not have to pay: he gave himself up for sale, along with his wife and children. Later, he repented, and asked for mercy. The King agreed to his plea and listened to his new business strategy, with which he could make the payment. And he get rid with his whole family. Objecting to what, then: she could no longer work for the King. Well, given his "background" the better he would seek to open his own business. This because he would learn from his mistake. The debtor started out single to work for the King, and because he has a family, he would do smaller businesses so as not to separate; and thus avoid: being sold.

The King who listened attentively and wrote down in the book "Strategies to get out of debt". Moved to mercy. 'He remitted his debt' and let him go to the city of his origin.

Plop! plop! -Strong and prolonged palms were heard in the room, and more than one stood up, for such a brilliant story to get out of debt: contracted with banks, financial savings banks and moneylenders. -This said in passing-: Alluding and eluding the King!

{1st Reading: Part 2}

What if the business 'promise' 'doesn't work', and; the King 'finds out' that "he has not complied with the Economic Solvency Pact"?

It happens that, after starting the small "trade or new company", 'of the former debtor, now an entrepreneur'.

He abused the renewed trust deposited by the merciful King. And he sent one of his employees to jail, without paying attention to his unresolved needs; as the King did, when: this "entrepreneur" was a 'debtor'.

When the King found out, they brought him to trial with the respective witnesses, Sam: he acted as Judge and his brothers as bailiffs.

Proceed:

The now: ex-entrepreneur and as a repeat offender or ex-debtor.

See him there, all screwed up and shameless.

I had no mercy, with my defendant, nor with his family. Who are left: unprotected, afflicted and helpless!

Therefore, I claim, founded the King's demand, because of this non-use of mercy as it was entrusted to him.

-Sentence-: Yes, mercy, he gave him freedom, why didn't he do the same? More: with arrogance, with treachery and cruelty. This ex-con: I act. And it is documented and testified: The disobedience before the King!

I said, case closed!