2 Amazon forest in danger

Hello guys this is not paid promotion. Today i was surfing on youtube and i find the channel name ecosia i see there videos and they are planning to plant 2 million trees in brazil 🇧🇷 . They plant 1 tree in 1.1 seconds by add revenue they make bye there search engine ecosia please download this app and save the world .

I've copy this whole chapter from Wikipedia because I wanted to show you facts .

The 2019 Amazon rainforest wildfires season saw an unusual surge in the number of fires occurring in the Amazon rainforest and other parts of the Amazon biome contained within the countries of Brazil, Bolivia, Paraguay, and Peru during the 2019 Amazonian tropical dry season.[2] Fires normally occur around the dry season as slash-and-burn methods are used to clear the forest to make way for agriculture, livestock, logging, and mining, leading to deforestation of the Amazon rainforest. Such activity is generally illegal within these nations, but enforcement of environmental protection has generally been lax. The increased rates of fire counts in 2019 led to international concern about the fate of the Amazon rainforest, which is the world's largest carbon dioxide sink and plays a significant role in global climate change.

2019 Amazon rainforest wildfires

Amazon fire satellite image.png

Locations of fires, marked in orange, which were detected by MODIS from August 15 to August 22, 2019

Location

Brazil, Bolivia, Peru, Paraguay

Statistics

Date(s)

January 2019 — ongoing

Cause

Slash-and-burn approach to deforest land for agriculture

Fatalities

2[1]

Map

Map of the Amazon rainforest ecoregions as delineated by the WWF in white and the Amazon drainage basin in blue.

Map of the Amazon rainforest ecoregions as delineated by the WWF in white and the Amazon drainage basin in blue.

The increased rates were first reported by Brazil's National Institute for Space Research (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, INPE) in June and July 2019 through satellite monitoring systems, but international attention was drawn to the situation by August 2019 when NASA corroborated INPE's findings, and smoke from the fires, visible from satellite imagery, darkened the city of São Paulo despite being thousands of kilometers from the Amazon. As of August 29, 2019, INPE reported more than 80,000 fires across all of Brazil, a 77% year-to-year increase for the same tracking period, with more than 40,000 in the Brazil's Legal Amazon (Amazônia Legal or BLA), which contains 60% of the Amazon. Similar year-to-year increases in fires were subsequently reported in Bolivia, Paraguay and Peru, with 2019 fire counts within each nation of over 19,000, 11,000 and 6,700, respectively, as of August 29, 2019.[3] It is estimated that over 906 thousand hectares (2.24×106 acres; 9,060 km2; 3,500 sq mi) of forest within the Amazon biome has been lost to fires in 2019.[4] In addition to the impact on global climate, the fires created environmental concerns from the excess carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide within the fires' emissions, potential impacts on the biodiversity of the Amazon, and threats to indigenous tribes that live within the forest.

The increased rate of fires in Brazil has raised the most concerns as international leaders, particularly French president Emmanuel Macron, and environmental non-government organizations (ENGOs) attributed these to Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro's pro-business policies that had weakened environmental protections and have encouraged deforestation of the Amazon after he took office in January 2019. Bolsonaro initially remained ambivalent and rejected international calls to take action, asserting that the criticism was sensationalist. Following increased pressure from the international community at the 45th G7 summit and a threat to reject the pending European Union–Mercosur free trade agreement, Bolsonaro dispatched over 44,000 Brazilian troops and allocated funds to fight the fires, and later signed a decree to prevent such fires for a sixty day period.

Other Amazonian countries have been more open for aid and reduce the rate of fires. While Bolivian president Evo Morales was similarly blamed for past policies that encouraged deforestation, Morales has since taken proactive measures to fight the fires and seek aid from other countries. At the G7 summit, Macron negotiated with the other nations to allocate US$22 million for emergency aid to the Amazonian countries affected by the fires.

The Amazon forest and deforestation

Edit

There are 670 million ha (1.7 billion acres; 6.7 million km2; 2.6 million sq mi) of Amazon rainforest.[5] Human-driven deforestation of the Amazon rainforest has been a major concern for decades as the rainforest's impact on the global climate has been measured.[6][7] From a global climate perspective, the Amazon has been the world's largest carbon dioxide sink, and estimated to capture up to 25% of global carbon dioxide generation into plants and other biomass.[8] Without this sink, atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations would increase and contribute towards higher global temperatures, thus making the viability of the Amazon a global concern.[9] Further, when the forest is lost through fire, additional carbon dioxide is released to the atmosphere, and could potentially contribute significantly to the total carbon dioxide content.[10] The flora also generates significant quantities of water vapor through transpiration which travel large distances to other parts of South America via atmospheric rivers and contribute to the precipitation in these areas.[11][12] Due to ongoing global climate change, environmental scientists have raised concerns that the Amazon could reach a "tipping point" where it would irreversibly die out, the land becoming more savanna than forest, under certain climate change conditions which are exacerbated by anthropogenic activities.[13][14]

Human-driven deforestation of the Amazon is used to clear land for agriculture, livestock, and mining, and for its lumber.[15] Most forest is typically cleared using slash-and-burn processes; huge amounts of biomass are removed by first pulling down the trees in the Amazon using bulldozers and giant tractors during the wet season (November through June), followed by torching the tree trunks several months later in the dry season (July through October).[16][17][18] Fires are most common in July though August.[17] In some cases, workers performing the burn are unskilled, and may inadvertently allow these fires to spread. While most countries in the Amazon do have laws and environmental enforcement against deforestation, these are not well enforced, and much of the slash-and-burn activity is done illegally.[15][19][20]

Deforestation leads to a large number of observed fires across the Amazon during the dry season, usually tracked by satellite data. While it is possible for naturally-occurring wildfires to occur in the Amazon, the chances are far less likely to occur, compared to those in California or in Australia.[21] Even with global warming, spontaneous fires in the Amazon cannot come from warm weather alone, but warm weather is capable of exacerbating the fires once started as there will be drier biomass available for the fire to spread.[22][23] Alberto Setzer of INPE estimated that 99% of the wildfires in the Amazon basin are a result of human actions, either on purpose or accidentally.[21] Further evidence of the fires being caused by human activity is due to their clustering near roads and existing agricultural areas rather than remote parts of the forest.[10]

Fires in Brazil

Edit

Past deforestation and fires in Brazil

Edit

Location of Amazônia Legal (red) within Brazil

States within Amazônia Legal.

Main article: Deforestation in Brazil

Brazil's role in deforestation of the Amazon rainforest has been a significant issue since the 1970s, as 60% of the Amazon is contained within Brazil, designated as the Brazil's Legal Amazon (Amazônia Legal, BLA).[19][24] Since the 1970s, Brazil has consumed approximately 12 percent of the forest, representing roughly 77.7 million ha (192 million acres)—an area larger than that of the US state of Texas.[25] Most of the deforestation has been for natural resources for the logging industry and land clearing for agricultural and mining use.[26][27] Forest removal to make way for cattle ranching was the leading cause of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon from the mid-1960s on. The Amazon region has become the largest cattle ranching territory in the world.[28] According to the World Bank, some 80% of deforested land is used for cattle ranching.[28] Seventy per cent of formerly forested land in the Amazon, and 91% of land deforested since 1970, is used for livestock pasture.[29][30] According to the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), "between 1990 and 2001 the percentage of Europe's processed meat imports that came from Brazil rose from 40 to 74 percent" and by 2003 "for the first time ever, the growth in Brazilian cattle production, 80 percent of which was in the Amazon[,] was largely export driven."[31] The Brazilian states of Pará, Mato Grosso, and Rondônia, located along the southern border of the Amazon rainforest, are in what is called the "deforestation arc."[32]

Deforestation within Brazil is partially driven by growing demand for beef and soy exports, particularly to China and Hong Kong.[16] Brazil is one of the largest exporters of beef, accounting for more than 20% of global trade of the commodity. Brazil exported over 1.6 million tonnes of beef in 2018, the highest volume in recorded history.[28] Brazil's cattle herd has increased by 56% over the last two decades. Ranchers wait until the dry season to slash-and-burn to give time for the cattle to graze.[33][34] While slash-and-burn can be controlled, unskilled farmers may end up causing wildfires. Wildfires have increased as the agricultural sector has pushed into the Amazon basin and spurred deforestation.[20] In recent years, "land-grabbers" (grileiros) have been illegally cutting deep into the forest in "Brazil's indigenous territories and other protected forests throughout the Amazon".[25]

Past data from INPE has shown the number of fires with the BLA from January to August in any year to be routinely higher than 60,000 fires from 2002 to 2007 and as high as 90,000 in 2003.[35]

Number of fires in Brazil's Amazônia Legal between January 1 and August 26 by year, reported by INPE[36]

Within international attention on the protection of the Amazon around the early 2000s, Brazil took a more proactive approach to deforestation of the Amazon rainforest. In 2004, the Brazilian government had established the Federal Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Deforestation in the Amazon (PPCDAM), with the goal to reduce the rate of deforestation through land use regulation, environmental monitoring, and sustainable activities, promoted through partnerships at the federal and private level, and legal penalties for violations.[37] Brazil also invested in more effective measures to fight fires, including fire-fighting airplanes in 2012. By 2014, USAID was teaching the indigenous people how to fight fires.[38] As a result of enforcement of PPCDAM, the rate of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon dropped 83.5% of their 2004 rates by 2012.[39] However, in 2014, Brazil fell into an economic crisis, and as part of that recovery, pushed heavily on its exports of beef and soy to help bolster its economy, which caused a reversal in the falling deforestation rates.[22] The Brazilian government has been defunding scientific research since the economic crisis.[40]

To support PPCDAM, the INPE began developing systems to monitor the Amazon rainforest. One early effort was the Amazon Deforestation Satellite Monitoring Project (PRODES), which is a highly-detailed satellite imagery-based approach to calculate wildfires and deforestation losses on an annual basis.[41] In 2015, INPE launched five complementary projects as part of the Terra Brasilis project to monitor deforestation closer to real-time. Among these include the Real-Time Deforestation Detection System (DETER) satellite alert system, allowing them to capture incidents of wildfires in 15-day cycles.[37] The daily data is published on the regularly updated Brazilian Environmental Institute government website, and later corroborated with the annual and more accurate PRODES data.[42][43][44][45]

By December 2017, INPE had completed a modernization process and had expanded its system to analyze and share data on forest fires.[46] It launched its new TerraMA2Q platform—software which adapts fire-monitoring data software including the "occurrence of irregular fires."[46] Although the INPE was able to provide regional fire data since 1998, the modernization increased access. Agencies that monitor and fight fires include the Brazilian Federal Environment and Renewable Resources Agency (IBAMA), as well as state authorities.[46] The INPE receives its images daily from 10 foreign satellites, including the Terra and Aqua satellites—part of the NASA's Earth Observation System (EOS).[46] Combined, these systems are able to capture the number of fires on a daily basis, but this number does not directly measure the area of forest lost to these fires; instead, this is done with fortnightly imaging data to compare the current state of the forest with reference data to estimate acreage lost.[47]

Jair Bolsonaro was elected as President of Brazil in October 2018 and took office in January 2019, after which he and his ministries changed governmental policies to weaken protection of the rainforest and make it favorable for farmers to continue practices of slash-and-burn clearing,[19] thus accelerating the deforestation from previous years.[2] Land-grabbers had used Bolsonaro's election to extend their activities into cutting in the land of the previously isolated Apurinã people in Amazonas where the "world's largest standing tracts of unbroken rainforest" are found.[25] Upon entering office, Bolsonaro cut US$23 million from Brazil's environmental enforcement agency, making it difficult for the agency to regulate deforestation efforts.[21][48] Bolsonaro and his ministers had also segmented the environmental agency, placing part of its control under the agricultural ministry, which is led by the country's farming lobby, weakened protections on natural reserves and territories belonging to indigenous people, and encouraged businesses to file counter-land claims against regions managed by sustainable forestry practices.[49]

2019 Brazil dry season fires

Edit

Agricultural fires in southern Pará, Brazil in August 2019.

INPE alerted the Brazilian government to larger-than-normal growth in the number of fires through June to August 2019. The first four months of the year were wetter-than-average, discouraging slash-and-burn efforts. However, with the start of the dry season in May 2019, the number of wildfires jumped greatly.[50] Additionally, NOAA reported that, regionally, the temperatures in the January-July 2019 period were the second warmest year-to-date on record.[51]INPE reported a year-to-year increase of 88% in wildfire occurrences in June 2019.[45][52] There was further increase in the rate of deforestation in July 2019, with the INPE estimating that more than 1,345 square kilometres (519 sq mi; 134,500 ha; 332,000 acres) of land had been deforested in the month and would be on track to surpass the area of Greater London by the end of the month.[49]

The month of August 2019 saw a large growth in the number of observed wildfires according to INPE. By August 11, Amazonas had declared a state of emergency.[53] The state of Acre entered into a environmental alert on August 16.[54] In early August, local farmers in the Amazonian state of Pará placed an ad in the local newspaper calling for a queimada or "Day of Fire" on August 10, 2019, organizing large scale slash-and-burn operations knowing that there was little chance of interference from the government.[55][56] Shortly after, there was an increase in the number of wildfires in the region.[55][57]

INPE reported on August 20 that it had detected 39,194 fires in the Amazon rainforest since January.[55] This represented a 77 percent increase in the number of fires from the same time period in 2018.[55] However, the NASA-funded NGO Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED) shows 2018 as an unusually low fire year compared to historic data from 2004–2005 which are years showing nearly double the number of counted fires.[58] INPE had reported that at least 74,155 fires have been detected in all of Brazil,[59] which represents a 84-percent increase from the same period in 2018.[60] NASA originally reported in mid-August that MODIS satellites reported average numbers of fires in the region compared with data from the past 15 years; the numbers were above average for the year in the states of Amazonas and Rondônia, but below average for Mato Grosso and Pará.[61][62][61][63] NASA later clarified that the data set they had evaluated previous was through August 16, 2019. By August 26, 2019, NASA included more recent MODIS imagery to confirm that the number of fires were higher than in previous years.[64]

INPE satellite imagery of a 70-by-70 mile area along the Purus River between Canutama and Lábrea in the state of Amazonas, taken on August 16, 2019, showing several plumes of smoke from wildfires, including areas that have been deforested

Number of wildfires detected by INPE from January 1 to August 26 in Brazil[36]

Highlighted rows are states within the BLA

Year

State

2013 Diff% 2014 Diff% 2015 Diff% 2016 Diff% 2017 Diff% 2018 Diff% 2019

Acre 782 47% 1,150 43% 1,649 72% 2,846 –57% 1,204 3% 1,246 134% 2,918

Alagoas 128 –9% 116 69% 197 –60% 78 5% 82 –19% 66 10% 73

Amazonas 1,809 117% 3,927 13% 4,457 22% 5,475 4% 5,730 –38% 3,508 117% 7,625

Amapá 28 75% 49 4% 51 –13% 44 –43% 25 88% 47 –48% 24

Bahia 2,226 –26% 1,631 12% 1,836 42% 2,614 –37% 1,634 –21% 1,280 86% 2,383

Ceará 281 12% 316 14% 361 36% 493 –57% 209 84% 385 –15% 327

Federal District 60 130% 138 –57% 59 179% 165 –31% 113 –63% 41 65% 68

Espírito Santo 186 –35% 120 119% 263 40% 370 –76% 87 2% 89 157% 229

Goiás 1,406 56% 2,202 –24% 1,658 53% 2,540 –22% 1,963 –28% 1,398 27% 1,786

Maranhão 4,427 89% 8,375 –1% 8,229 –13% 7,135 –29% 5,000 –4% 4,760 17% 5,596

Minas Gerais 2,067 48% 3,067 –44% 1,710 83% 3,134 –30% 2,179 –24% 1,647 77% 2,919

Mato Grosso do Sul 1,421 –28% 1,017 112% 2,165 14% 2,486 3% 2,583 –54% 1,171 285% 4,510

Mato Grosso 8,396 40% 11,811 –21% 9,278 56% 14,496 –31% 9,872 –19% 7,915 95% 15,476

Pará 3,810 145% 9,347 –6% 8,776 0% 8,704 25% 10,919 –62% 4,068 164% 10,747

Paraíba 72 75% 126 –35% 81 –4% 77 –48% 40 100% 80 1% 81

Pernambuco 174 –2% 170 43% 244 –58% 102 22% 125 –18% 102 29% 132

Piauí 1,666 122% 3,708 –23% 2,840 –2% 2,765 –36% 1,749 104% 3,569 –21% 2,818

Paraná 1,361 –9% 1,227 0% 1,234 52% 1,877 –9% 1,698 –9% 1,531 18% 1,810

Rio de Janeiro 192 133% 448 –21% 354 7% 379 –33% 251 –42% 144 175% 396

Rio Grande do Norte 71 –7% 66 28% 85 –32% 57 21% 69 44% 100 –32% 68

Rondônia 817 266% 2,990 31% 3,934 10% 4,349 –16% 3,624 –37% 2,270 183% 6,441

Roraima 951 85% 1,759 –14% 1,499 136% 3,541 –82% 622 218% 1,982 132% 4,608

Rio Grande do Sul 890 69% 1,505 –40% 901 188% 2,601 –37% 1,619 –35% 1,039 95% 2,029

Santa Catarina 969 –32% 652 0% 646 147% 1,600 –29% 1,133 –22% 883 25% 1,107

Sergipe 155 –56% 68 122% 151 –53% 71 –4% 68 11% 76 –18% 62

São Paulo 1,385 81% 2,515 –54% 1,148 100% 2,302 –29% 1,613 37% 2,212 –26% 1,616

Tocantins 4,436 38% 6,132 –16% 5,130 55% 7,962 –31% 5,461 –25% 4,047 59% 6,436

Total 40,166 60% 64,632 –8% 58,936 32% 78,263 –23% 59,672 –23% 45,656 80% 82,285

By August 29, 80,000 fires had broken out in Brazil which represents a 77% rise on the same period in 2018, according to BBC.[65] INPE reported that in the period from January 1 to August 29, across South America, and not exclusive to the Amazon rainforests, there were 84,957 fires in Brazil, 26, 573 in Venezuela, 19,265 in Bolivia, 14,363 in Colombia, 14,969 in Argentina, 10,810 in Paraguay, 6,534 in Perú, 2,935 in Chile, 898 in Guyana, 407 in Uruguay, 328 in Equador, 162 in Suriname, and 11 in Guyana Francesa.[66]

First media reports

Edit

While INPE's data had been reported in international sources earlier, news of the wildfires were not a major news story until around August 20, 2019. On that day, the smoke plume from the fires in Rondônia and Amazonas caused the sky to darken at around 2 p.m. over São Paulo—which is almost 2,800 kilometres (1,700 mi) away from the Amazon basin on the eastern coast.[67][68] [2] NASA and US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) also published satellite imagery from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on NASA's Terra satellitein alignment with INPE's own, that showed smoke plumes from the wildfires were visible from space.[61][17] INPE and NASA data, along with photographs of the ongoing fires and impacts, caught international attention and became a rising topic on social media, with several world leaders, celebrities, and athletes expressing their concerns.[69]

According to Vox, of all the concurrent wildfires elsewhere in the world, the wildfires in the Amazon rainforest in Brazil were the most "alarming".[68]

Responses of the Brazilian government

Edit

File:Pronunciamento de Jair Bolsonaro em 23 de agosto de 2019.webmPlay media

Official pronouncement of Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro.

In the months prior to August 2019, Bolsonaro mocked international and environmental groups that felt his pro-business actions enabled deforestation.[70][21] At one point in August 2019, Bolsonaro jokingly calling himself "Captain Chainsaw" while asserting that INPE's data was inaccurate.[50] After INPE announced an 88% increase of wildfires in July 2019, Bolsonaro claimed "the numbers were fake" and fired Ricardo Magnus Osório Galvão, the INPE director.[19][42][71][72] Bolsonaro claimed Galvão was using the data to lead an "anti-Brazil campaign".[73][74][75][76] Bolsonaro had claimed that the fires had been deliberately started by environmental NGOs, although he provided no evidence to back up the accusation.[74] NGOs such as WWF Brasil, Greenpeace, and the Brazilian Institute for Environmental Protection countered Bolsonaro's claims.[77]

Bolsonaro, on August 22, argued that Brazil did not have the resources to fight the fires, as the "Amazon is bigger than Europe, how will you fight criminal fires in such an area?".[78]

Historically, Brazil has been guarded about international intervention into the BLA, as the country sees the forest as a critical part of Brazil's economy.[79] Bolsonaro and his government have continued to speak out against any international oversight of the situation. Bolsaonaro considered French President Emmanuel Macron's comments to have a "sensationalist tone" and accusing him of interfering in what he considers is a local problem.[80] Of Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Bolsonaro stated: "They still haven't realized that Brazil is under new direction. That there's now a president who is loyal to [the] Brazilian people, who says the Amazon is ours, who says bad Brazilians can't release lying numbers and campaign against Brazil."[50]

Bolsonaro's foreign minister Ernesto Araújo has also condemned the international criticism of Bolsonaro's reaction to the wildfires, calling it "savage and unfair" treatment towards Bolsonaro and Brazil.[81] Araújo stated that: "President Bolsonaro's government is rebuilding Brazil", and that foreign nations were using the "environmental crisis" as a weapon to stop this rebuilding.[81] General Eduardo Villas Bôas, former commander of the Brazilian Army, considered the criticism of world leaders, like Macron and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, to be directly challenging "Brazilian sovereignty", and may need to be met with military response.[82]

File:Força Nacional envia 30 bombeiros para atuar contra incêndios na Amazônia.webmPlay media

'National Force sends 30 firefighters to act against Amazon fires' - video published by the Bolsonaro government on August 25, 2019

With increased pressure from the international community, Bolsonaro appeared more willing to take proactive steps against the fires, saying by August 23, 2019, that his government would take a "zero tolerance" approach to environmental crimes.[83] He engaged the Brazilian military to help fight the wildfires on August 24, which Joint Staff member Lt. Brig. Raul Botelho stated was to create a "positive perception" of the government's efforts.[84][85] Among military support included 43,000 troops as well as four firefighting aircraft, and an allocated US$15.7 million for fire-fighting operations.[86][87] Initial efforts were principally located in the state of Rondônia, but the Defense Ministry stated they plan to offer support for all seven states affected by the fires.[88] On August 28, Bolsonaro signed a decree banning the setting of fires in Brazil for a period of 60 days, making exceptions for those fires made purposely to maintain environmental forest health, to combat wildfires, and by the indigenous people of Brazil. However, as most fires are set illegally, it is unclear what impact this decree could have.[65]

Rodrigo Maia, president of the Chamber of Deputies, announced that he would form a parliamentary committee to monitor the problem. In addition, he said that the Chamber will hold a general commission in the following days to assess the situation and propose solutions to the government.[89]

After a report from Globo Rural reveal that a WhatsApp group of 70 people was involved with the Day of Fire,[90] Jair Bolsonaro determined the opening of investigations by Federal Police.[91]

Protests against Brazilian government policies

Edit

File:Multitudinaria marcha en defensa de la Amazonia y contra las políticas ambientales de Bolsonaro.webmPlay media

'Crowd march in defense of the Amazon and against the environmental policies of Bolsonaro' - video news report from Abya Yala TV in Bolivia.

In regards to the displacement of the indigenous people, Amnesty International has highlighted the change in protection of lands belonging to the indigenous people, and have called on other nations to pressure Brazil to restore these rights, as they are also essential to protecting the rainforest.[92] Ivaneide Bandeira Cardoso, founder of Kanindé, a Porto Velho-based advocacy group for indigenous communities, said Bolsonaro is directly responsible for the escalation of forest fires throughout the Amazon this year. Cardoso said the wildfires are a "tragedy that affects all of humanity" since the Amazon plays an important role in the global ecosystem as a carbon sink to reduce the effects of climate change.[93]

Thousands of Brazilian citizens held protests in several major cities from August 24, 2019, onward to challenge the government's reaction to the wildfires.[94][95] Protesters around the world also held events at Brazilian embassies, including in London, Paris, Mexico City, and Geneva.[96]

Protest in Porto Alegre on August 24, 2019

Impact on the indigenous peoples of Brazil

Edit

In addition to environmental harm, the slash-and-burn actions leading to the wildfires have threatened the approximately 306,000 indigenous people in Brazil who reside near or within the rainforest.[25][97] Bolsanaro had spoken out against the need to respect the demarcation of lands for indigenous people established in the 1988 Constitution of Brazil.[83] According to a CBC report on Brazil's wildfires, representatives of the indigenous people have stated that farmers, loggers, and miners, emboldened by the Brazilian government's policies, have forced these people out of their lands, sometimes through violent means, and equated their methods with genocide.[92] Some of these tribes have vowed to fight back against those engaged in deforestation to protect their lands.[98]

International responses

Edit

File:Así se incendia la Amazonia - NELSON EL CORRESPONSAL.webmPlay media

Video news report from Todo Noticias based in Argentina, showing burned forest

International leaders and environmental NGOs have condemned President Bolsonaro for the extent of the wildfires within the Brazilian portion of the Amazon.

Several international governments and environmental groups raised concerns at Bolsonaro's stance on the rainforest and the lack of attempts by his government to slow the wildfires. Among the most vocal was Macron, given the proximity of French Guiana to Brazil.[99][100][101][102][103] Macron called the Amazon wildfires an "international crisis," while claiming the rainforest produces "20% of the world's oxygen"—a statement disputed by academics.[a][b] He said, "Our house is burning. Literally."[106]

Discussion about the fires came into the final negotiations of the EU–Mercosur Free Trade Agreement between the EU and Mercosur, a trade bloc of Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, and Paraguay.[107] With the wildfires on-going, both Macron and Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar have stated they will refuse to ratify the trade deal unless Brazil commits to protecting the environment.[100]

Finance minister of Finland Mika Lintila suggested the idea of a EU ban on Brazilian beef imports until the country takes steps to stop the deforestation.[33][108]

Fires in Bolivia

Edit

File:NOAA Satellites - Below the wispy cirrus clouds over the southern edge of the Amazon Rainforest, -GOESEast spotted plumes of smoke possibly from agricultural fires burning in Bolivia and Brazil on Aug. 4, 2019. More imagery-.webmPlay media

GOESEast imagery of the southern edge of the Amazon Rainforest, plumes of smoke from agricultural fires burning in Bolivia and Brazil on Aug. 4, 2019

Background

Edit

In Bolivia, the annual seasonal chaqueo has become an "entrenched custom" that is currently encouraged by recent political decisions.[109] The forest fires in Bolivia occurred during the dry season but they happened independently of Brazil's fires.[110]

Bolivia has 7.7 percent of the Amazon rainforest within its borders.[111] The Bolivian Amazon covers 19.402 million hectares (47.94 million acres) which comprise 37.7 percent of Bolivia's forests and 17.7 percent of Bolivia's land mass.[112] Bolivia's forests cover a total of 51.407 million hectares (127.03 million acres), including the Chiquitano dry forests which is part of the Amazon biome and a transition zone between the Amazon rainforest and the drier forests of the southern Chaco region.[113]

Santa Cruz Department

Edit

By August 16, Bolivia's Santa Cruz had declared a departmental emergency because of the forest fires.[114][115] From August 18 to August 23, approximately 800 thousand hectares (2.0 million acres) of the Chiquitano dry forests were destroyed, more than what was lost over a typical two-year period. [110] By August 24, the fires had already destroyed 1,011 thousand hectares (2.50 million acres) of forestland in the Santa Cruz and were burning near Santa Cruz, Bolivia.[116] By August 26, wildfires had destroyed over 728 thousand hectares (1.80 million acres) of Bolivia's savanna and tropical forests, according to the Bolivian Information Agency (BIA).[117] Over a period of five days, from August 18 to August 22, 450 thousand hectares (1.1 million acres) of forest near Roboré were destroyed.[109]

On August 25, 4,000 state employees and volunteers were fighting the fires.[117] By August 25, the Chiquitano has lost 650 thousand hectares (1.6 million acres) of tropical forest within both the Amazon and the dry forests, mostly within the Santa Cruz province; like the Brazil fires, such fires occur during the dry season, but the number of fires in 2019 were larger than in previous years.[118] Throughout August, wildfires have been spreading across four states.[116] Jaguars, tapirs, and dozens of endangered species are threatened.[116] By August 26, fires in the Dionisio Foianini Triangle—the Brazil-Bolivia-Paraguay triangle had destroyed savannah and tropical forest "near Bolivia's border with Paraguay and Brazil."[119]

President Evo Morales initially ignored the fires. Juan Quintana, the president's chief of staff, had said they did not require "foreign firefighting aid".[116] In the week of August 18, Morales dispatched soldiers and three helicopters to fight fires in an area about the size of Oregon.[116] On August 22, Morales contracted the Colorado-based Boeing 747 Supertanker (also known as Global SuperTanker) to conduct firefighting missions over the Bolivian Amazon, after having previously refused to call on external help.[116] The 747 Supertanker is the largest firefighting aircraft in the world, which can hold approximately 19,000 gallons of water per trip.[120][121][122] Morales has stated that the governments of Spain, Chile, and Paraguay have reached out to him to provide help for fighting the fires.[118]

The government had been trying to determine the cause of the fires, with the Bolivian land management authority attributing 87% of the fires to illegal slash-and-burn by farmers.[118] Multiple NGOs assert that deforestation rates in Bolivia increased 200 percent after the government quadrupled available land for deforestation to farmers in 2015. The land authority attributed the increase on lax environmental enforcement.[116][123][124]

Political opponents of Morales alleged that the Supreme Decree 3973, a mandate to further beef production in the Amazon region, is a major cause of the Bolivian fires.[118][125] The Santa Cruz province is a critical area for agriculture and cattle-rearing.[126]

Probioma's Miguel Crespo said that, "It may take up to 200 years for the forests in Bolivia to heal. I've never seen an environmental tragedy on this scale ...The government has detonated an environmental disaster. In large part, this tragedy is the result of the state's populism and development vision based on agribusiness."[116]

Fires in Paraguay's Pantanal

Edit

File:NOAA Satellites - Fires in the -AmazonRainforest are continuing to burn. Here, -GOESEast zoomed in on burn scars in Bolivia, Brazil, and Paraguay via Day Land Cloud Fire RGB on August 22, 2019. More imagery-.webmPlay media

Burn scars in Bolivia, Brazil, and Paraguay captured by GOES-16 on August 22, 2019

By August 22, fire emergencies in Paraguay's Alto Paraguay district and the UNESCO protected Pantanal region were issued by its federal government. Paraguay President Mario Abdo Benítez was in close contact with Bolivia's Morales to coordinate response efforts.[127] By August 17, as wind direction changed, flames from fires in Bolivia began to enter northern Paraguay's Three Giants natural reserve in the Paraguayan Pantanal natural region. By August 24, when the situation had stabilized,[128] Paraguay had lost 39,000 hectares (96,000 acres) in the Pantanal. An Universidad Nacional de Asunción representative lamented the disaster failed to attract as much media attention as the fires in the Amazon rainforest.[129]

While most of the Pantanal regions—140,000 and 195,000 square kilometres (54,000 and 75,000 sq mi)—is within Brazil's borders in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, the natural region also extends into Mato Grosso and portions of Bolivia. It sprawls over an area estimated at between 140,000 and 195,000 square kilometres (54,000 and 75,000 sq mi). [130][131] Within the Pantanal natural region, which is located between Brazil and Bolivia, is the "world's largest tropical wetland area". According one of the engineers charged with monitoring satellite data showing the "evolution of the fires", the Pantanal is a "complex, fragile, and high-risk ecosystem because it's being transformed from a wetland to a productive system."[132] The Pantana is bounded by the Humid Chaco to the south, the Arid Chaco dry forests to the southwest, Cerrado savannas lie to the north, east and southeast, and the Chiquitano dry forests, to the west and northwest,[130] where thousands of hectares burned in Bolivia.

A national parks researcher said that outsiders only know the Amazon, which is a "shame because the Pantanal is a very important ecological place."[131] The Paraná River, which flows through Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay, is the "second largest river system in South America."[133]

Fires in Peru

Edit

Peru had nearly twice the growth in the number of fires in 2019 than Brazil, with most believed to be illegally set by ranchers, miners, and cocaine growers.[15] Much of the fires are in the Madre de Dios which borders Brazil and Bolivia, though the fires there are not a result of those started in the other countries, according to the regional authority. However, they are still concerned about the impact of downwind emissions, particularly carbon monoxide, on residents of Madre de Dios.[134] There were 128 forest fires reported in Peru in August 2019.[135]

Environmental impacts of the fires

Edit

Emissions

Edit

Images created by the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder which depict carbon monoxide caused by fires in the Amazon region of Brazil from Aug. 8-22, 2019.[136]

Locations of active wildfires (marked in orange) in the Amazon as of 22 August 2019

By August 22, NASA's AIRS published maps of increased carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide resulting from Brazil's wildfires.[137][136] On the same day, the European Union's Copernicus Climate Change Service reported a "discernible spike" in emissions of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide generated by the fires.[138]

Areas downwind of the fires have become covered with smoke, which can potentially last upwards of months at a time if the fires are left to burn out. Hospitals in cities like Porto Velho had reported over three times the average number of cases of patients suffering from the effects of smoke over the same year-to-year period in August 2019 than in other previous years. Besides hindering breathing, the smoke can exacerbates patients with asthma or bronchitis and have potential cancer risk, generally affecting the youth and elderly the most.[139]

Biodiversity

Edit

Scientists at the Natural History Museum in London, described how while some forests have adapted to fire as "important part of a forest ecosystem's natural cycle", the Amazon rainforest—which is "made up of lowland, wetland forests"—is "not well-equipped to deal with fire". Other Amazon basin ecosystems, like the Cerrado region, with its "large savannah, and lots of plants there have thick, corky, fire resistant stems", is "fire adapted".[140]

Mazeika Sullivan, associate professor at Ohio State University's School of Environment and Natural Resources, explained that the fires could have a massive toll on wildlife in the short term as many animals in the Amazon are not adapted for extraordinary fires. Sloths, lizards, anteaters, and frogs may unfortunately perish in larger numbers than others due to their small size and lack of mobility. Endemic species, like Milton's titi and Mura's saddleback tamarin, are believed to be beset by the fires. Aquatic species could also be affected due to the fires changing the water chemistry into a state unsuitable for life. Long-term effects could be more catastrophic. Parts of the Amazon rainforest's dense canopy were destroyed by the fires therefore exposing the lower levels of the ecosystem, which then alters the energy flow of the food chain.[32]