It depends on the nature of the fan fiction. If it's simply a creative exploration of the person's public image in a positive light, it could be seen as ethical. However, if it violates the person's privacy or is used to spread false information, it's not ethical at all. Fan fiction should be about celebration, not exploitation.
I'm not entirely sure specifically about a 'Professor Hogg' in 'The Crown' as it may be a relatively minor or specific plot point. It could be a fictional character created to serve a particular storyline within the context of the show, perhaps related to academic or political storylines that are common in 'The Crown'.
The potential impacts are diverse. For starters, positive fan fiction could enhance his image as a role model, especially among those who are fans of the genre. It could also create a sense of community around his ideas or actions. However, negative fan fiction could lead to cyberbullying or trolling situations. Moreover, it might make it difficult for him to separate his real self from the fictional portrayals, causing stress or confusion. Additionally, it could impact his public relations, as people may form opinions based on the fan - made stories rather than his real - life achievements.
Perhaps the haunted story of Hogg Middle School is related to the old basement. Legend has it that there are cold spots in the basement that can't be explained. There have been rumors of strange voices coming from down there, as if someone was crying or whispering. Some say it could be the spirit of a janitor who passed away while working in the basement many years ago.
I'm not sure if there's a real - life Professor Hogg directly related to the events in 'The Crown'. It's very likely that he's a fictional creation made to enhance the narrative of the show. 'The Crown' does take some creative liberties, so characters like this are often designed to fit into the overall story arc.
It might be that in the school gymnasium, there are unexplained moving objects. Balls rolling by themselves or equipment getting moved around without any human interference. This could be part of the haunted story.
One possible reason could be misinformation or confusion on his part. Maybe he got some facts wrong initially and later corrected himself, which might seem like two different stories. Another reason could be an attempt to manipulate the narrative depending on the audience he was addressing at different times.
It might mean that he is not being consistent in his statements. This could lead to doubts about his credibility. If he's a public figure, such statements can cause confusion among the public who are relying on accurate information from him.
We don't have enough details to know exactly who James is. He could be an ordinary person with an extraordinary secret, or he might be someone well - known in a particular community or field.