debates competition

The number of debates in a debate competition depends on the type of competition and the individual strengths of the debaters. Generally speaking, the third and fourth debaters were more suitable for the role in the competition. The third debate was responsible for concluding the arguments of the first two sentences and putting forward a new point of view to support the entire debate. The fourth debate was responsible for raising more in-depth questions on the basis of the first two sentences to guide the audience to think and reflect. Of course, there were some debaters who were more suitable for the role of first or second debater. During the first debate, they were responsible for presenting arguments and explaining evidence to support the entire debate. In the second debate, they were responsible for concluding the first two sentences and proposing a new point of view to support the entire debate. No matter what role he played, the most important thing was to be fully prepared and perform to his best in the game.

There were two main aspects of debate in the literary world in the 1990s: Should literature reflect reality? Should literature be political? These debates had a profound impact on the development of literature and the attitude of the literary world.

It's nonfiction. The book is based on real discussions and research related to discipline.

It would be super interesting. Different fictional characters and their storylines could be argued about, leading to endless discussions and new perspectives.

One main topic is the role of the author. Some argue the author's intention is crucial, while others believe the text should stand alone. Another is the concept of realism in fiction. Whether it should accurately depict the real world or can be more fantastical is often debated. Also, the moral and ethical implications of fictional works are a big part of these debates.

Primary school students should watch the debate on television. In fact, television as a form of entertainment was also good for children. On the one hand, television could provide many interesting programs and information such as cartoons, movies, documentaries, sports competitions, etc., which could broaden children's horizons and understand the world. In addition, television could also provide some intellectual challenges and games such as puzzles, puzzle games, etc. to train children's thinking ability. On the other hand, television could also negatively affect children's vision and physical and mental health. Staring at the screen for a long time would cause eye fatigue, shortsightedness, and other problems. Moreover, the bright colors of the television could easily make children addicted to it. Therefore, whether a child could watch TV or not should be judged based on factors such as age, eyesight, and living habits. Parents should appropriately control the time and content of their children's television watching and encourage their children to engage in outdoor activities and reading to protect their children's physical and mental health.

Whether e-books could replace paper books was a controversial topic. The advantage of e-books was that they could be read anytime, anywhere, and were lighter and easier to carry than paper books. On the other hand, paper books had a unique touch and smell that allowed readers to better immerse themselves in the story. In the debate, supporters might emphasize the advantages of e-books, such as being more environmental friendly and saving resources, while opponents might think that paper books have more characteristics and value, such as better maintaining the continuity of the plot, allowing readers to better feel the emotions in the book, etc. No matter what, e-books and paper books were different reading methods, and each had its own advantages and disadvantages. Which method was more suitable for the readers would depend on their personal preferences and reading habits.

They could. Fiction debates can inspire new ideas and perspectives, pushing authors to think outside the box and create more diverse and thought-provoking works.

In a debate, the three debaters were usually responsible for putting forward arguments and organizing them to provide strong support for the defense. The following are some things to take note of and clues to writing a debate: 1. Propose an argument: The third debate needs to put forward your own point of view, that is, whether it is beneficial to open the book. In a debate, this point of view needs to be clearly expressed so that other debaters can better support their own point of view. 2. Organizing arguments: The third debate requires organizing arguments to prove one's point of view. These arguments could come from existing research, examples from life, educational experiences, and so on. To organize your argument, you need to be organized and clear so that other debaters can understand it better. 3. Rebutting the opponent's point of view: In a debate, the opponent's debater may put forward opposing points to refute his own point of view. The third debate required the preparation of arguments and strategies to refute the opponent's point of view in order to better defeat the opponent in the debate. 4. Summing up the argument: At the end of the debate, the third debate needs to summarize their own views and emphasize the importance of their arguments to the audience. This could help the audience better understand their own point of view and win more votes for the defense. The following is a possible debate draft: Dear judges and listeners, I'm the third defender from Team X. The topic of our debate is "Is it beneficial to open the book?" First of all, I would like to point out that an open-book exam is not an ideal way to take an exam. Although exams can help students better grasp knowledge, if students are not fully prepared or do not read the questions carefully, they may fail the exam. Therefore, students should be fully prepared before the exam and read the questions carefully instead of relying on pre-exam revision. Secondly, open-book exams could improve students 'knowledge. Through the open-book exam, students can read more freely and broaden their knowledge. At the same time, students could also improve their thinking ability through thinking and discussion. In the end, I don't think open-book exams can completely replace traditional exams. The traditional examination method could better assess the student's knowledge and skills and reflect the student's true level more accurately. Therefore, before the exam, students should fully understand their strengths and weaknesses and choose the exam method that suits them. To sum up, I think that open-book examination is not an ideal examination method, but it can also improve the students 'knowledge level to a certain extent. We should be fully prepared before the exam and read the questions carefully instead of relying only on pre-exam revision. Finally, I hope that our debate will provide more evidence to strengthen our argument. Thank you!

In the context of debates about 'Pulp Fiction', the foot massage scene has multiple interpretations. It could be about power dynamics, as the person giving the massage may have some sort of influence over the one receiving it. It also adds to the overall mood of the movie, which is part of what people debate about - whether it's appropriate or effective in creating the intended atmosphere.