The West Memphis Three case is a complex and controversial one. Three teenagers were wrongly convicted of the murders of three young boys in West Memphis, Arkansas. There was a lack of solid physical evidence tying them to the crime, but they were convicted based on things like their 'goth' appearance and some rather flimsy witness testimony. Years of legal battles ensued as many people believed in their innocence.
The West Memphis Three were three young men who got caught up in a very bad situation. They were accused of murdering three boys in a really brutal way. Their trial was full of problems. The police and prosecution seemed to be more interested in getting a quick conviction rather than finding the real killers. They were finally released after a lot of public outcry and new evidence emerging that made their original convictions look very shaky.
I'm not entirely sure of the specific 'the rights to the streets of Memphis full story' without more context. It could potentially be about the access rights of people in the streets of Memphis, perhaps related to civil rights, freedom of movement, or ownership of public spaces.
I'm afraid I can't give a definite summary. However, it might be about the rights of different groups in Memphis to use the streets for different purposes, such as transportation, protest, or commerce. It could also involve issues of safety, equality, and public access.
Memphis Belle is indeed rooted in truth. Although some elements might have been dramatized for the screen, the core events and characters have a basis in real history.