Well, it's hard to say for sure. You'd have to look into the background and research about the article. Maybe it's inspired by real events but not a completely accurate account.
Article 370 is not a fictional story. It was an actual constitutional provision related to the special status of a particular region. However, the interpretation and impact of it can vary depending on different perspectives and analyses.
Article 370 was a constitutional provision related to the special status of a region. It wasn't based on a story in the traditional sense. It was more about governance and legal framework.
It's not a straightforward yes or no. Article 370 was a legal provision, not a story in the traditional sense. It was based on specific political and historical circumstances.
It can be said that Article 375 has some roots in true stories. The plot and characters might be fictionalized, but they draw elements from real situations to add authenticity.
It's a mix. While it takes cues from real situations, it also incorporates fictional elements for dramatic effect. So, it's not a pure retelling of a specific true story.
It depends on your perspective. Some elements of Article 15 might be rooted in real events, but it also takes creative liberties to enhance the narrative and make it more engaging for the audience.
It depends on the specific content and the sources it's based on. Some movies claim to be true stories but may take certain liberties for dramatic effect.