extreme three sides to every story

In my understanding, 'extreme three sides to every story' suggests that for any given story, there are three sides that are highly significant or extreme in some way. Take a political event for instance. There are the political parties involved, which represent two sides. But then there's also the public's perception, which can be a third side that is extreme in terms of its influence on the event. The public might have extreme reactions, which can change the course of the political event. And these three sides together form a more complete view of the story.

Well, it means that every story has more than just two sides. Usually we think of two sides like right and wrong, but there's often a third extreme side that might be unexpected or overlooked. For example, in a dispute between two neighbors, one side might seem right, the other wrong, but there could be a third aspect like an external factor affecting them both that changes the whole perspective.

Sure. In a relationship breakup. One side might feel extremely betrayed, the other side might think they were pushed to the limit. And then there's the side of friends and family, whose extreme reactions or influence can either mend or break the relationship further.

It might be a misspelling. Usually, we say 'there are two sides to every story'. If it's 'extreme three sides to every story', it could imply that in addition to the common two opposing views in a story (like two people's different accounts), there is an extreme or unexpected third aspect that also needs to be considered, perhaps a hidden factor, a greater context, or a third party's perspective that changes the whole understanding.

Well, 'three sides to every story' implies that there's not just one way to view a situation. There's the perspective of the person involved, the perspective of the person observing, and a more balanced or objective view that takes into account different factors and viewpoints. It encourages us to think more deeply and consider all possible sides.

It implies that every story has multiple viewpoints. Say you have a dispute - the person who started it might see it one way, the person they were in the dispute with might see it differently, and then there could be a view from someone who wasn't directly involved but has an opinion based on what they saw or heard.

Let's take the case of a school policy change. The school board wants to implement a strict new dress code. The students oppose it as they feel it restricts their self - expression. But the extreme side could be a group of parents who think the school should not worry about dress code at all and instead focus on more important educational matters like improving teaching quality or providing more resources. This extreme side might not be as directly involved in the initial conflict between the school board and the students but has a different and extreme view on the whole situation.

Basically, it implies that there's more than just two opposing views. Often, we tend to think in terms of 'this side' and 'that side' but in reality, there's often an additional aspect to consider. For instance, in a story about a new building being constructed in a neighborhood. The developers might see it as progress and a great opportunity for business. The local residents might see it as an intrusion on their peace and quiet. But then there's also the side of the local economy. The construction could bring in more jobs and more customers for local businesses, which is another view that needs to be considered.

Sure. In a business deal gone wrong. One side might think they were cheated. Another side might think they were just following normal business practices. And the third 'extreme' side could be the view of the employees who are now at risk of losing their jobs because of the deal. Their view might be extreme in the sense that they see the whole situation as a complete disaster for their lives, while the other two sides are more focused on financial or contractual matters.

To understand all three sides in a workplace conflict, first, listen to each person involved separately. Let them tell their story without interruption. Second, look at any evidence like emails or documents related to the conflict. And third, consider the context of the workplace environment. Maybe there are unspoken rules or past events affecting the situation.