The New York Times might break stories related to Trump's business dealings. There could be investigations into how his companies operate, potential conflicts of interest, or any new partnerships or financial transactions. Also, stories about his rallies and the reactions they generate among his supporters and the general public are possible breaking news.
The New York Times reports on Trump's breaking stories in a comprehensive way. They usually have a team of journalists who gather information from multiple sources. They verify the facts thoroughly before publishing. For example, if it's a story about Trump's policy announcements, they might interview people involved, analyze the potential impacts, and present different perspectives.
Fiction often offers escapism and imagination that can be more engaging than straightforward truth. It allows for creative expression and can touch hearts in ways raw facts might not.
The New York Times has a certain influence on public perception. In the case of this 'fools idiots Trump story', it could potentially sway public opinion in several ways. Firstly, if the story presents well - researched facts that support the idea of Trump being foolish or idiotic in certain actions, it may convince some who were on the fence. Secondly, it may further polarize the public, with Trump supporters digging in their heels and his opponents using the story as ammunition. And thirdly, it could also contribute to the overall narrative in the media about Trump, which over time can shape how people remember his presidency.
I'm not sure specifically which 'fools idiots' story in the New York Times you're referring to. The New York Times has had a lot of coverage on Trump, some positive, some negative. They might have used such terms in opinion pieces to criticize certain actions or statements of Trump, but without more context, it's hard to say exactly.