There isn't really a single, well - known court term specifically for 'creating story'. But if a story is created and there are legal issues, for example, if it's a case of plagiarism, the court might refer to things like 'infringement of creative rights'. In cases where a story is used without permission, the court would look at aspects such as 'fair use' which is a concept that determines if a use of a creative work is legal or not. So, while there's no one term for 'creating story' there are related legal concepts that could come up in court.
The imperial court and the imperial court had the same meaning. There was no difference. Court was a wrong way of writing, but the correct way of writing was imperial court. The imperial court referred to the place where the ancient monarch dealt with political affairs. It was a central governing body headed by the monarch. Therefore, the correct way to write it was the Imperial Court.
In a cartoon court, the settings and characters can be very imaginative. You might have talking animals or super - heroes as judges or lawyers. In a real - story court, everything is based on real people and real laws. The language used in a cartoon court can be made easy for a general audience, especially kids, to understand. However, in a real court, the legal jargon can be very difficult to understand for those not trained in law. Another difference is that a cartoon court can resolve a case very quickly, while a real court case can drag on for months or even years.
Account. For example, when someone is giving a description of an event that happened, it can be seen as an account, which is also a form of story. It may be more factual than a fictional story, but still a sequence of events told in a certain way.