evidence based use of novels

One principle is to consider the historical and cultural context in which the novel was written. For example, a novel from the Victorian era may have different values and social commentaries compared to a modern one. Another is to look at the author's background and intentions. If an author has a known stance on certain issues, it can influence how we interpret their work in an evidence - based way. Also, reviews and academic analysis of the novel can serve as evidence for its significance and proper use.

Evidence based use of novels in literary analysis helps in several ways. First, it allows for a more in - depth exploration. By closely examining the evidence, we can uncover hidden meanings. For instance, in a novel with complex symbolism, evidence from the text can help us decode what those symbols represent. Second, it makes the analysis more reliable. When we base our interpretations on evidence, it's easier to convince others of our viewpoints. Third, it helps in comparing different novels. We can use evidence to find similarities and differences in themes, characters, etc.

It's not that straightforward. Fictional stories usually can't be used as direct evidence. They might offer analogies or illustrate concepts, but they lack the factual basis needed for solid evidence.

Yes, they can be. Social stories often draw on research and real-life experiences to provide useful information and support.

Well, when using fictional evidence, make sure it relates closely to your main point and is presented in a way that seems plausible and relevant.

Well, evidence based on story often has the power to engage emotions. People are more likely to remember a story than just cold facts. In research, anecdotal evidence (which is a type of evidence based on story) can sometimes lead to new hypotheses. For instance, if a patient tells a doctor a story about how a certain natural remedy seemed to work for them, it might inspire the doctor to look into it further, even if it's not yet scientifically proven.

Well, cryptozoology is often seen as fictional. Most of the supposed creatures it investigates lack reliable proof and are more the stuff of myths and legends.

Not entirely. While it has a loose basis in reality, it incorporates significant fictional elements to make it more engaging for the audience.

Yes, they are. Social stories have been shown to be effective in many cases and are based on research and practical experience.

Story based evidence is commonly known as narrative evidence. This type of evidence relies on the telling of a story or series of events to support a claim or argument. However, it might not always be as reliable as empirical or scientific evidence.