One common element is lack of proper safety measures. For example, not wearing appropriate protective gear like goggles or gloves. Another is inattentiveness. When operators are distracted, accidents are more likely to happen. Also, poor maintenance of the lathe can lead to parts malfunctioning and causing dangerous situations.
One horror story could be about a Femco lathe suddenly malfunctioning during an important production run. The tool might break and fly off, endangering the operator and causing damage to the workpiece. It could lead to a halt in production and costly repairs.
I heard of a Femco lathe where the power supply unit had a short circuit. It just happened out of the blue during normal operation. Sparks flew and the whole lathe shut down immediately. It took days to figure out the exact problem and get it fixed, delaying all the projects related to that lathe.
One lathe horror story is about a worker who didn't properly secure a large piece of metal on the lathe. As the lathe started spinning, the piece came loose and flew across the workshop, narrowly missing several people. It caused a lot of damage to the equipment around as well.
In civil law, direct combination and indirect combination were important criteria to judge whether two contracts constituted the same meaning. The direct combination refers to the mutual confirmation of the two contracts directly through the expression of will. That is, one party directly sends the intention to the other party to express that the other party directly accepts and performs it. An indirect combination refers to the mutual confirmation of two contracts through the implication or implication of one party. That is, one party implies that the other party performs the contractual obligations through his own behavior or words.
The following aspects need to be considered when determining whether the two contracts constitute a direct or indirect combination:
1. Whether the contents of the contract are directly confirmed with each other. If the contents of the two contracts directly confirm each other, that is, the contents of any one of the contracts directly apply to the other contract, then the two contracts constitute a direct combination. On the contrary, if the contents of the two contracts need to be confirmed by other means, such as the terms of the contract need to be explained by legal provisions, then the two contracts constitute an indirect combination.
2. Whether the parties to the contract confirm each other directly. If the parties to the two contracts directly confirm each other and fulfill their contractual obligations, then the two contracts constitute a direct combination. On the other hand, if the parties to the two contracts confirm and fulfill their contractual obligations through implication or implication, then the two contracts constitute an indirect combination.
3. Whether the contract is based on a declaration of will. If the two contracts were based on mutual recognition, then the two contracts constituted a direct combination. On the other hand, if the two contracts are based on implied or implied mutual confirmation, then the two contracts constitute an indirect combination.
The identification of direct combination and indirect combination requires comprehensive consideration of factors such as the content of the contract, the behavior of the parties to the contract, and the intention of the contract to ensure that the content and behavior of the two contracts can directly and indirectly confirm each other and form a consistent intention.
I'm not sure exactly what 'Phillips Mill the full story' refers to, but a mill named Phillips Mill could have a long and interesting history. It might have been involved in milling various products like flour or lumber. There could be tales of the people who owned it and the workers who toiled there.