In a sense, being the owner of a war story is like being a custodian of a piece of history. You are in control of how the story is presented, whether it's through written memoirs, oral storytelling, or other means. It's a role that comes with the power to shape how others perceive the events of the war, so it should be handled with care.
It could mean that the story is not about war. Maybe it's a story about peace, daily life, or something other than military conflict.
It could mean that the story is not about war, perhaps it's about something peaceful like daily life, love or friendship.
It could mean that you are the original creator of the Elheim novel. You might have come up with the story, characters, and the overall concept.
It could mean that on IMDb (the Internet Movie Database), the content in question is not related to a war story. Maybe it's a disclaimer or a way to categorize something as not being of the war story genre.
Well, this statement is likely differentiating the nature of a particular story. Maybe it was expected to be a war story, but it turned out to be a love story. So, it's emphasizing that love, not war, is the main theme here. For example, in some movies, they might seem like they're going to be about war battles and military strategies, but then it turns out the real focus is on the relationships and love between the characters.
It could imply that the 'grassens' war is a distinct or separate matter from other events or stories. Maybe 'grassens' is a specific place, group, or concept related to a war that has its own unique narrative.
Well,'mat best not a war story' might imply that there is a mat, perhaps a floor mat or a mat in some other sense, and the best or preferred situation is that it has no connection to a war story. It could be that someone is trying to create a non - war - related narrative around this mat, or it's a comment on keeping the concept of the mat separate from the often - grim tales of war.
It might also be a historian who has researched and documented various war stories. They study different sources, interview veterans if possible, and then become sort of an 'owner' in the sense that they are the ones presenting and preserving the story. For example, Stephen Ambrose was a well - known historian who 'owned' the stories he wrote about World War II through his extensive research and writing. Another possibility is a family member. If a relative has passed down a war story within the family, they can be considered the owner in a way as they are the keepers of that family's historical account.
It could mean a figurative 'war' against fictional works. Maybe it represents a struggle between different views on fiction, such as those who oppose certain types of fictional content due to moral, religious or cultural reasons, or it could be about the battle to preserve or change the status of fiction in society, like in terms of its influence on people, especially the younger generation.
Financial war refers to a war in the economic field, in which countries or organizations compete for market share through financial means, control capital flows and financial markets, and other means to maximize their own interests. In the financial war, various financial institutions, investment platforms, and Multinational Corporations would participate in it. They would gain benefits through information imbalance, market manipulation, capital leverage, and other means. At the same time, it would also lead to market fluctuations and financial risks. Financial wars are usually competitions between countries, but they can also become competitions between regions or even global competitions.