Well, if we break it down. 'Dave Meltzer' is a name, and 'won' indicates some form of success or victory. 'Impossible without a good story' suggests that there is a strong connection between achieving whatever it is Dave Meltzer is aiming for and having a good story. For example, if he is a writer, a good story is his product. If he is in business, a good story could be his brand's narrative. In any case, a good story seems to be a necessary ingredient for his success.
No. It doesn't seem to be a common phrase as it's rather unclear and not something that is widely known or used in general language.
I'm not entirely sure what 'davemeltzerwon good story' specifically means as it seems rather unclear. It could potentially be a misspelling or some sort of inside reference. Maybe 'Dave Meltzer' is a person and 'won' could imply he won something related to a 'good story', but without more context it's hard to say.
Definitely not. A proper English phrase would follow grammar rules and have a more logical construction. 'davemeltzerwon' seems like a made - up or miswritten word, and the combination with 'good story' doesn't form a typical phrase structure. It's more like a random collection of words that lack the proper syntactic connection.
In my view, 'ending without story' is when an ending is presented in isolation, detached from the context of a tale. For instance, in a play, if the final scene shows a new character arriving and declaring victory without any prior mention of who they are or what they're fighting for. There's no thread of a story to tie the ending to the rest of the work, making it seem like an ending without a proper story.
Perhaps it implies a love that exists in the present moment, without the need for a past full of stories to define it. It's a love that doesn't rely on shared history or dramatic tales, but is more about the essence of the connection at a given time. For example, two people might meet and have an immediate, deep connection that isn't rooted in any long - drawn - out story of how they got there.
Yes, you typically can't enjoy the full BFA story without participating in raiding. Raiding is often an integral part of the game's narrative progression.
It means that geometry stories, which are full of knowledge about shapes and spaces, add depth to our understanding of the world. Without them, we might not see the hidden order in things.
It could imply a state of liberation or freedom as advocated by Adyashanti that is independent of one's personal narrative. Maybe it means being free from the constraints that our own stories place on us, like past traumas, self - defined identities, etc.
It could imply a form of love that is pure and not based on a pre - conceived narrative or set of events. Maybe it's about love that exists in the present moment, free from the trappings of stories we often create around relationships.
Marriage without a matchmaker meant that one had to choose a partner to marry without a matchmaker's introduction. In ancient times, marriage usually required matchmaking, and marrying without a matchmaker violated this traditional rule. This kind of behavior was regarded as an improper way of love in ancient times, and was sometimes even belittled as adultery or elopement. However, with the development of society, free love gradually became the mainstream, and the meaning of marrying without a matchmaker gradually evolved into a way to freely choose a spouse.