What does 'new times stands by their spencer story' mean?
It could mean that in the new era, a certain entity (maybe a media or a group) supports or upholds the story related to Spencer. However, without more context, it's hard to be more specific.
What does 'new times stands by their spencer story' mean?
It could imply that the 'new times' (perhaps a publication, organization or a new era in general) supports or adheres to the story related to Spencer. But without more context, it's hard to be very specific.
Who or what is Spencer in 'new times stands by their spencer story'?
The identity of Spencer in 'new times stands by their spencer story' remains a mystery. It could be a historical figure named Spencer, and the 'new times' is now re - evaluating and standing by his story. Or perhaps it's a contemporary Spencer who has a story that is relevant to the values or trends of the new times. It could also be a fictional Spencer, and the statement is part of a fictional narrative where the new times are in support of the fictional story about him.
Can you explain more about 'new times stands by their spencer story' in a real - world context?
I'm not sure without more context. It could be that in a particular industry or community, there is a story about someone named Spencer, and the 'new times' which could be a media or a group of people are supporting that story. For example, if Spencer is an artist, the 'new times' might be standing by the story of his artistic journey.
What does it mean that Jason Leopold stands behind story?
It could mean that Jason Leopold supports or vouches for the story. Maybe he has evidence or strong belief in the truthfulness of the story.
What does 'new york times changes story' mean?
It could mean that The New York Times has made alterations to a news article or narrative they were previously reporting. Maybe new information came to light, or they had to correct some inaccuracies in the original story.
What does 'New York Times Recants Kavanaugh Story' mean?
Well, 'recant' means to take back or withdraw something that was previously said or published. So when the New York Times recants the Kavanaugh story, it implies that they've realized there were flaws in their reporting. It could be due to new evidence emerging, or perhaps they made errors in their fact - checking process. This is a significant step as the Kavanaugh case has been a highly controversial and widely covered topic, and any change in reporting about it can have a big impact on public perception.
What does it mean when the New York Times corrects a story?
It means that they found an error in a previously published story. Maybe there were inaccuracies in the facts, misquotes, or wrong interpretations. So, they take the step to correct it to maintain their credibility.
What does it mean that The New York Times retracts the Sicknick story?
It means that the story they previously published about Sicknick was incorrect in some way, so they are taking it back. This could be due to new evidence coming to light or inaccuracies in their initial reporting.
What does it mean that 'New York Times sat on Russian story'?
It could mean that the New York Times held back or delayed reporting on a story related to Russia. Maybe they had some internal reasons like lack of verification, editorial decisions, or external pressures that made them not publish it right away.
What does 'New York Times changes story' mean exactly?
Well, 'New York Times changes story' might imply that the editorial decisions within the New York Times led to a shift in how a particular story was presented. This could be due to various factors such as public feedback, updated research, or a change in the overall narrative they want to convey. For example, if they were covering a political event and new developments occurred that changed the context, they would change the story to reflect the accurate situation.