What is the real story of B - 17 in helping to cure cancer?
In the real story about B - 17 and curing cancer, there are those who swear by it. They tell stories of seeing tumors shrink or symptoms improve after using B - 17. However, the scientific research tells a different story. Cancer treatment is a very serious matter that requires rigorous testing. B - 17 has not met the standards of evidence - based medicine. While it may seem appealing as a natural alternative, the lack of conclusive evidence means that it cannot be considered a reliable way to cure cancer. Also, the potential side effects and the lack of understanding of its exact mechanism in the body make it a very controversial topic in the field of cancer treatment.
Are miracle cancer cure stories real?
Some miracle cancer cure stories might have elements of truth. There could be rare cases where patients experience unexpected remissions due to various factors like a strong immune response or an as - yet - not - fully - understood biological mechanism. However, many so - called miracle cures are often misinterpreted or exaggerated. We need to approach these stories with a healthy dose of skepticism and rely on scientific research for reliable cancer treatments.
Cure of Lung Cancer
The treatment criteria for lung cancer were based on symptoms, imaging, and phlegm tests for acid fast bacilliform bacteria. The symptoms included cough, expectoration, hot flashes, night sweats, etc. If the symptoms disappeared after standardized treatment, it meant that the patient was cured. The main purpose of imaging was to observe the image at the beginning and after the treatment. If there were any signs such as fibers, calcium, proliferations, nodes, and thickened pleura, it could also indicate that the lung was cured. Sputum examination of the acid fast bacili was an effective basis for the diagnosis of lung cancer. If the acid fast bacili in the phlegm turned negative after standardized treatment, and no acid fast bacili was found after multiple examinations, it could also indicate that the lung cancer was cured. Therefore, the criteria for the treatment of lung cancer included clinical symptoms, imaging, and examination of phlegm for acid fast bacilliform bacteria. The whole treatment process was 6-8 months, and the whole treatment process for drug-resistant lung cancer was 18-24 months. Most of the patients with lung cancer could be cured as long as they received standard anti-tumor treatment. However, if the treatment was not standardized, it would lead to treatment failure or even become drug-resistant malaria. The cure rate was low, the treatment cost was high, and the social harm was great. The course of treatment for relapsed lung cancer was significantly longer. Initial treatment usually took about half a year, while relapsed lung cancer took one year or even one and a half years. The adverse drug reactions would also increase, and the damage to the liver and kidney would also increase.
Is the B - 17 really helpful in curing cancer? Share the real story.
Yes, the B - 17 is believed to be helpful in cancer treatment in some real stories. Laetrile, which is derived from B - 17, was thought to have anti - cancer properties. Some patients claimed to have experienced positive effects after using products related to B - 17. However, it's important to note that mainstream medical research has not fully proven its effectiveness in curing cancer, and in many places, the use of B - 17 for cancer treatment remains controversial due to lack of conclusive scientific evidence.
How to cure lung cancer
The treatment of lung cancer usually includes medication, surgery, and other treatments. Drug therapy was the most commonly used method. Commonly used anti-inflammatory drugs included isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamid, and ethambutal. The treatment time was usually six months or longer, and the specific time was determined by the patient's condition and the doctor's recommendation. During the treatment period, the doctor would perform regular monitoring, including chest X-rays and phlegm smear tests, to assess the treatment effect and adjust the treatment plan. The patient should avoid overexertion and maintain adequate sleep and rest to help his body recover. A reasonable diet was also crucial for recovery. It was to consume enough protein, vitamins, and minerals to strengthen the body's resistance. During the treatment period, the patients needed to take certain isolation measures to prevent the bacteria from spreading to others. Follow the doctor's and health department's instructions and take the correct isolation and protective measures. All in all, the treatment of lung cancer needed to follow the doctor's instructions, follow the prescribed drug treatment plan, and cooperate with adequate rest and nutrition to achieve a cure.
Can you cure lung cancer?
Lung cancer could be cured. Most of the patients with lung cancer usually needed about six months of treatment to be completely cured. However, for some rare cases, such as repeated or uncontrollable conditions, a longer treatment time may be required. The patient needed to insist on taking the medicine according to the course of treatment and avoid stopping the medicine without authorization. Initial stage of the disease usually required 2 months of anti-infectious treatment with four drugs and 4 months of anti-infectious treatment with two drugs. Advanced stage of the disease may require at least 6 months of treatment. For patients with lung cancer and other diseases, treatment may take at least six months. For patients with relapsed lung cancer, the treatment time was about nine months. In general, most patients with lung cancer could be cured as long as they followed the doctor's advice and insisted on treatment.
How to cure the lung cancer quickly?
The treatment of lung cancer mainly included medication, surgery, and other treatments. Drug therapy was the most commonly used method. Commonly used anti-inflammatory drugs included isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamid, and ethambutal. The principle of drug treatment was early, joint, regular, moderate, and full course. The treatment time was usually six months or longer, depending on the patient's condition and the doctor's recommendation. At the same time, the patient should have enough rest and ensure adequate nutrition, avoid overwork, and consume enough protein, vitamins, and minerals. In addition, during the treatment period, the patient needed to take quarantine measures and follow the instructions of the doctor and the health department to prevent the bacteria from spreading to others. Surgery and other treatment methods would depend on the situation. All in all, the treatment of lung cancer required early detection and early treatment, and the use of drugs according to the doctor's guidance. At the same time, attention should be paid to rest and nutrition, and isolation measures should be followed to promote the improvement of the condition.
What are some inspiring cancer cure success stories?
A great success story is that of Steve Jobs. He had pancreatic cancer. Although he ultimately passed away, he managed to live for several years after the diagnosis. His case brought a lot of attention to pancreatic cancer research. His fight against the disease inspired many to be more aware of cancer symptoms and the importance of early detection.
What is the story of the man who discovered cesium chloride as a cancer cure?
Well, the story might involve a series of experiments, setbacks, and finally the eureka moment when the man realizes the potential of cesium chloride in treating cancer. It could also include his efforts to convince the medical community of his findings.
Can Chinese medicine cure the lung cancer?
Traditional Chinese medicine for lung cancer usually only played an auxiliary role. It could generally be used to alleviate the damage to the spleen and stomach function and liver function caused by medication. It could also promote the discharge of inflammatory substances stored in the lungs to a certain extent and help clear the lungs. Traditional Chinese medicine could only relieve the symptoms of lung cancer, but it could not help kill the bacteria in the body. Therefore, traditional Chinese medicine could not cure lung cancer. The standard short-term anti-tumor chemotherapy protocol recommended by the National Lung Cancer Control Program was currently the correct treatment method, which could cure more than 90% of patients. Therefore, there was not enough evidence to support the effect of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of lung cancer. It was recommended that patients with lung cancer go to regular hospitals as soon as possible to receive standard full-course treatment.
Could the ancient times cure lung cancer?
The ancient treatment methods for lung cancer were not completely effective. In ancient times, lung cancer was generally considered a terminal illness that was very difficult to treat. Although traditional Chinese medicine could alleviate symptoms and improve the quality of life by conditioning the whole body and lungs, it usually could not cure the disease. In ancient times, it was thought to be a full-body disease. Patients would cough, lose weight, and other symptoms. It was contagious and sometimes turned into a plague. Ancient medical facilities were not perfect, and there were no modern antibiotics. This might be one of the reasons why it was difficult to treat lung cancer. Therefore, there were limited treatments for this disease in ancient times, and it was difficult to cure it.