No. In modern writing, italics are the preferred way to denote short story titles. Underlining was more common in the past, especially when typewriters were used and italicizing was not as easily achievable. But now, with digital writing being the norm, italics are used for short story titles, while underlining is generally reserved for other things like hyperlinks (in some digital formats).
Typically no. Italics have become the standard for short story titles. Underlining can be confusing as it may be mistaken for something else, like a hyperlink. Also, the use of italics gives a more refined and modern look to the text. For example, if you were to write about a short story in a literary analysis, italicizing the title like 'The Yellow Wallpaper' would be the correct and more aesthetically pleasing way rather than underlining it.
No. While underlining was used in the past for similar purposes as italicizing, the convention has shifted. Now, italicizing short story titles is more in line with current style guides. Italics are more versatile and look better in most printed and digital formats. For instance, in a book review, when you mention short story titles such as 'Harrison Bergeron', italicizing them makes the text flow better and is more consistent with how other titles (like book and magazine titles) are presented.
No. Underlining is an older method of indicating titles, and in modern writing, italicizing is the preferred way to denote fictional books in a story.
Yes, typically in written work, the name of a short story is underlined. This is a common convention in handwritten or typed documents to set the title apart from the rest of the text. It gives it a certain emphasis and indicates that it is a distinct entity, like a proper name.
No. In a bibliography, the name of a short story is usually written in italics. This is a standard formatting style to make it clear that it is a title of a work. Underlining is not typically used in bibliographies for short stories.
Yes, generally. Underlining gives emphasis to the name of the short story. It helps the reader to quickly identify it as a title. For instance, when you are writing about literature in a manuscript or a handwritten note, underlining a short story's name like 'An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge' makes it stand out among the regular text. It is a way to show respect for the work and to clearly mark it as a proper title.
In most cases, you don't need to underline the name of a short story. Titles are typically italicized or put in quotation marks.
In general, you don't underline the name of a short story. Instead, it's common to use italics or quotation marks to distinguish the title. This is a standard convention in writing.
It depends on the style guide you are following. In some older or more traditional styles, underlining the title of a short story was a common practice. But these days, with the prevalence of digital media and word processing software, italicizing is often preferred. So, it may not be necessary to underline it in most contemporary writing.
No, you typically don't. It's more common to use italics or quotations for short story titles. This is a widely accepted formatting rule in writing.
Yes, I often underline short stories. Underlining helps me to mark important passages, interesting dialogues or beautiful descriptions. It makes it easier for me to review and remember the key points later.
No, you don't underline short story titles in MLA. You should enclose them in quotation marks. This is a standard convention in MLA style for titles of shorter works.