The moral is that kindness should not be wasted on the ungrateful or evil. The farmer showed kindness to the viper by warming it up, but the viper repaid him with a bite. It warns people to be cautious about who they help.
Well, the moral is pretty clear. In the 'farmer and the viper full story', we see that the farmer, out of pure kindness, took in the viper. But the viper, being its natural, cruel self, bit the farmer. This shows that you can't expect good things from bad or ungrateful beings. It's like in real life, if you help someone who has bad intentions, they might end up harming you instead of being grateful.
The story of the farmer and the viper is a great example of a cautionary tale. The moral of this story is about being discerning when it comes to showing kindness. The farmer's act of kindness towards the viper was not met with any form of gratitude. Instead, the viper bit him. This implies that we should be able to recognize the true nature of those we are about to help. There are people or things that are inherently dangerous or ungrateful, and helping them blindly might lead to our own downfall. It also reflects on the idea that some things cannot change their nature, just as the viper couldn't change its venomous nature, no matter how warm and kind the environment provided by the farmer was.
A farmer found a viper nearly frozen in the cold. Feeling pity, he picked it up and warmed it in his bosom. But as soon as the viper revived, it bit the farmer. The farmer realized his mistake of helping the ungrateful viper.
The moral is that kindness should not be wasted on the evil or ungrateful. Just like the farmer who showed kindness to the snake but was bitten in return.
The moral of the story of the farmer and his sons is that often, the journey or the process of doing something is more valuable than the expected outcome. The sons were focused on finding a hidden treasure in the vineyard. However, through their strenuous digging, they unknowingly prepared the land for a bountiful harvest. This shows that we should not be too fixated on a specific reward but rather on the actions we take. Because these actions can lead to unforeseen and often more valuable results than what we originally aimed for.
The moral could be that everyone, regardless of their social status, has something valuable to offer. The farmer, though simple, might have wisdom or qualities that the king lacks.
The moral of this story is that we should be cautious about making assumptions. The farmer assumed the crane was helping, but it was only after its own interests. We often do the same in life and end up being wrong about people's motives.
The moral might be about acceptance. The crane and viper are so different, yet if they are in love, it means they have to accept each other's ways. The crane has to accept the viper's ground - dwelling and often solitary nature, and the viper has to accept the crane's aerial and more social side. It's a lesson in embracing differences in a relationship.
The moral could be that you are judged by the company you keep. Just like the stork was in the wrong place with the cranes stealing from the farmer, and got punished along with them even though it wasn't really his intention to steal.
The moral could be the value of experience and wisdom. The old farmer, with his years of living and working on the land, has likely faced many situations. His decisions are probably based on all that he has learned over time.
The moral is probably 'Greed leads to downfall'.
It could also be about family unity. The old farmer and his son rely on each other. They work together towards common goals like maintaining the farm. When they are united, they can overcome difficulties more easily, like dealing with bad weather or pests.