Since I don't have the 'ny times brexit story' in front of me, a likely focus could be on the negotiations that took place. Brexit negotiations were complex and long - drawn - out. There were disputes over issues like the Irish border. The UK wanted to leave the EU single market and customs union but at the same time needed to ensure there was no hard border between Northern Ireland (which is part of the UK) and the Republic of Ireland (an EU member). This led to the creation of the Northern Ireland Protocol. Also, the story might touch on how Brexit has influenced the UK's standing in international politics and its future trade deals with other non - EU countries.
I'm not sure specifically as I haven't read that exact 'ny times brexit story'. But generally, key points in Brexit stories could include the economic impact on the UK and EU, changes in trade relations, and the political implications within the UK.
Well, without having read the 'ny times brexit story' directly, it might cover aspects like how different industries in the UK were affected by Brexit. For example, the fishing industry had high hopes for changes in fishing rights. Also, it could discuss the movement of people between the UK and EU. There were concerns among EU citizens living in the UK and vice versa about their residency status and future opportunities. Another important part could be about the new regulations that the UK had to set up post - Brexit in various sectors to replace the EU - wide regulations it was previously under.
One key point is the immediate chaos and destruction. The towers collapsing led to mass panic. Another is the heroic efforts of the first responders. They rushed into danger to save lives.
One key point is the sequence of events on 9/11. Another is the human stories of loss and survival. Also, the role of the media in reporting the event as it happened.
Well, in the NY Times homeless story, it may focus on the personal stories of the homeless individuals. Their daily struggles, such as finding food and a safe place to sleep at night. It could also touch on the lack of support systems for them, and how difficult it is for them to get back on their feet without proper assistance. Maybe it also mentions the stigmatization they face from society, which makes their situation even worse.
I'm not sure specifically as I haven't read the exact 'ny times child labor story'. But generally, it might cover issues like the prevalence of child labor in certain industries, the working conditions those children face, and possible solutions to end child labor.
One key point could be the push - and - pull factors. For example, poverty and lack of opportunities in Mexico might be pushing people to leave, while the promise of better living standards in the US is pulling them.
I don't know the exact content of the 'ny times brexit story', but generally, public opinion in the UK regarding Brexit was very divided. Some people supported it believing it would bring back national sovereignty. Others opposed it, fearing economic hardships and loss of access to the EU market.
In the NY Times' coverage of the WeWork Neumann story, a major point was Neumann's excessive and sometimes unorthodox behavior. For instance, his penchant for partying and a lavish lifestyle while the company was facing financial challenges. The business model of WeWork was also a key area. The Times would have analyzed how WeWork's model of renting large spaces and sub - leasing them as co - working spaces had flaws. Additionally, the coverage would have delved into the power struggle within the company as it started to crumble, and how Neumann's departure was a turning point in the company's journey, from a high - flying startup to a struggling business.
One key point could be the musical's powerful choreography. The NY Times might have praised how the dance sequences in 'West Side Story' enhance the storytelling. Another aspect could be the acting performances. The actors' ability to bring the complex characters to life might be highlighted. Also, the music itself is a strong point. The iconic score that drives the emotions of the story likely received acclaim.
I don't have enough information to give a definite summary of the 'ny times wmd story'. However, if it's related to the historical context of WMDs, a key point could be how the concept of WMDs has evolved over time. The New York Times might report on how the understanding of different types of WMDs (nuclear, chemical, biological) has changed. It could also look at how the international perception of countries with potential WMD capabilities has shifted, and what actions have been taken as a result of that perception.
Without having read the specific 'ny times pompeo story', it's a challenge to summarize. But if it was related to Pompeo's time at the State Department, potential key points could be his attempts to restructure the department, his influence on U.S. - led international initiatives, and any political battles he had within the department. Also, if the story was about his relations with Congress, it could involve how he dealt with oversight and his ability to push through certain policies.