Well, first of all, the one who actually threw the kid is clearly responsible. This could be a deranged individual. However, if there were others around who could have prevented it but didn't, they might also bear some responsibility. For example, if there were security guards or neighbors who saw the situation developing and didn't intervene. Also, if there was a situation where the building had faulty safety features that contributed to the kid being thrown, the building owner or management could potentially be held accountable.
There are several parties who could be responsible. Obviously, the perpetrator who threw the child is the main one. But it could also be the case that if the child was in a daycare or a similar institution, and there were no proper safety measures in place, the institution or its staff could be responsible. Additionally, if there were witnesses who had a chance to stop it but chose not to act, they may also be considered partly responsible in a moral if not legal sense.
It could be someone with malicious intent, like a criminal or an abuser.
The consequences could be extremely serious. There could be severe physical injuries like broken bones, head trauma, and internal bleeding. The child might also suffer from long - term disabilities, both physical and mental, such as paralysis or cognitive impairments. Emotionally, the child could develop post - traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and have difficulty trusting others in the future.
It could be an abuser, perhaps someone with malicious intent in the children's environment.
Well, it's a terrifying incident. He could have broken bones, internal injuries, or even worse. There could be many reasons for this, like an accident or some kind of malicious act. Maybe he was leaning too far out of a window or there was some sort of fight or struggle that led to him being thrown. Rescue teams would have to act quickly to get him medical attention.
Well, it depends on various factors. If there were something soft like a big pile of cushions or a trampoline below, he could have a chance of surviving with less severe injuries. But generally, being thrown off the third story is likely to cause fractures, internal bleeding and head trauma.
It depends. If the jungle gym had some obvious defects that led to the kid's fall, then the people in charge of the place where the jungle gym is located, like the park management or the school if it's on school grounds, could be responsible. However, if the kid was misusing the jungle gym in a very extreme way that was not foreseeable, it might be a different situation. But in general, the ones who should ensure the safety of the equipment are often held accountable.
The moa guy who throws the kid off the third story is the primary person to be held responsible. He has directly caused harm to the kid. In addition, if there were any bystanders who could have intervened but didn't, they may also bear some moral responsibility, although the legal liability mainly lies with the perpetrator. If the moa guy is part of an organization or under someone's supervision, and that organization or supervisor had some negligence in preventing this from happening, they might also be questioned legally or morally.
We can't determine who threw the boy just from the 'boy thrown from 3rd story'. It could be a criminal act by a bad person, or perhaps there was some sort of accident that made it seem like he was thrown when in fact it was something else entirely, like a structural failure that caused him to fall in a way that looked like being thrown.
Maybe it's a group of Hogwarts' own staff members. They could be jealous of Snape's influence or knowledge. They might fabricate evidence against him to get him removed. For example, some teachers who have always disagreed with his teaching style or his past associations.
I'm not sure specifically which 'Christmas Story' you mean. There are likely many Christmas stories with kids in them.