It could mean that until the one with power or the main actor (the lion in this metaphor) shares their perspective, the real or full story isn't known. For example, in a situation where there are different accounts of an event, the most important or dominant party's view is yet to be heard.
This phrase 'until the lion tells the story' can be seen as a call for the most influential or significant voice to be heard. Picture a courtroom drama where the key witness (the lion) hasn't testified yet. We can't fully grasp what happened until they do. It's about realizing that there could be a dominant narrative that we're missing until the right entity shares it. In a historical context, often the victors (the lions) write the history, and until they tell their side, our understanding is incomplete.
Well, 'until the lion tells the story' might imply waiting for the authoritative voice. Just like in a jungle, the lion is often seen as the king. So, it's like waiting for the king's version. Maybe in a group project at work, the lead person hasn't given their input yet, and we need that to really understand the whole situation.
It could mean that until the one with power or a different perspective (the lion here symbolically) shares their side of things, we don't have the full picture. For example, in a situation where there are different accounts of an event, like a conflict between a hunter and a lion. Usually, we hear the hunter's story, but until the lion tells his story, we might be misinformed.
It means that we often only hear one version of a story, usually the dominant or more common one. Until the lion, which could represent a less - heard or oppressed side, tells its story, we don't have the full picture. For example, in history, the colonizers' version of events was often told, but we rarely heard the stories of the colonized until they started to speak up.
The statement 'only until the lion can tell the story' might be a metaphorical way of saying that there is a certain truth or set of facts that are currently hidden or not fully understood because we lack the lion's point of view. It could be about the power dynamics in the animal world. The lion, as a powerful predator, may have insights into how different species coexist and interact in ways that are not obvious to us. Maybe it has a story about how it has adapted to changes in its environment over time, which could be very valuable for us to know in terms of conservation and understanding nature better.
It's important because it promotes fairness. Without hearing all sides, we might be unfair to the 'lion' or the side that has not been given a chance to speak. For instance, in a workplace dispute, if only the boss's side is considered, the employees might be wrongly blamed.
Well, 'until the lion writes his own story' means that for a long time, the narrative has been controlled by others. Just like in history, the powerful often write the stories. But when the lion, who represents those who have been overlooked or misrepresented, writes its own story, it will show a different perspective. For example, in colonial history, the colonizers wrote the stories of the colonized, but when the colonized people start to write their own stories, we see the real struggles, cultures, and values that were previously hidden. It's about giving a voice to the voiceless and showing the truth from their own eyes.
It could imply that until the powerful or the silenced (represented by the lion) gain the ability to tell their own stories, the true version of events may not be fully known. Just like in many situations, the dominant voices often shape the stories, but when the less - heard (the lion) can write every story, things will be different.
Sure. In a company, there might be rumors about a big decision. But until the CEO (the lion) makes an official announcement (tells the story), no one really knows the truth.
It could mean that until the ones who are usually silent or oppressed (represented by lions here in a metaphorical sense) share their own experiences or perspectives, the real truth or a complete understanding cannot be achieved.
I think it's about giving a voice to the voiceless. The 'lions' here can be seen as any group or individual that has been overshadowed by others' stories. Maybe it's about a marginalized community or someone who has been misrepresented. When they are finally able to tell their story, it might change how we view a certain event, a relationship, or even an entire culture.
It means that something doesn't convey or communicate a narrative. For example, a picture with just a single color might tell no story as there are no elements to form a sequence of events or a plot.