Well, it shows that our actions and personalities can be misconstrued by others. We all have our own motives, desires, and ways of living. But when those clash with someone else's, they may view us as a monster. Say, a vegetarian might think of a meat - eater as a monster for contributing to animal slaughter, while the meat - eater might think the vegetarian is a monster for trying to impose their beliefs on them. In different stories, different values and actions can make us seem like the 'bad guy'.
This statement means that in the narratives of different people, we can play the role of the antagonist or the 'monster'. Maybe because of our actions, beliefs, or even just our existence. For instance, a person who is very competitive in sports might be seen as a monster by the opponents he constantly defeats, as they view him as ruining their chances of winning.
This statement means that our existence has a narrative quality. We start as individuals with a beginning, live through various events (the middle of our story), and in the end, what remains is the story of our life. It's about how we are remembered, whether it's for great achievements, small kindnesses, or even our mistakes.
It could imply that history is often written from a subjective point of view. Those who record history may have biases, agendas, or limited perspectives. So, in a sense, the 'facts' presented might be shaped by these factors, making it seem like a form of fiction.
It simply means that a novel is a form of presenting a narrative or tale. Novels are structured to tell a story with characters, plot, and settings.
Well, this statement implies that literature is a realm of the made - up. It means that when we read stories, we enter a world where the rules can be bent. Fiction gives the freedom to the author to express things that might not be possible in reality. It's like a playground for creativity. We can have dragons and magic in stories, which shows that literature is not bound by the limitations of the real world.
It could imply that the movie 'Interstellar' is based on real scientific theories to a large extent. For example, the concepts of black holes, time dilation, and interstellar travel are all rooted in scientific research, even if some parts are dramatized for the movie's sake.
It suggests that a novel is more about creating a subjective experience or leaving an impression on the reader rather than presenting a logical debate or argument.
Well, it could be. If it's about a character named Matt, saying it's based on a true story means there's a real - life inspiration behind it. Maybe there was a real Matt who had certain experiences that the story is built around.
It could imply that Laura Story has done something remarkable. Maybe she has made great contributions in her field, like in art, music, or community service. People often praise those who have a positive impact on others or society at large.
Well, it suggests that family plays a crucial role in shaping who we are and the tales we have to tell. It's where we first learn, grow, and encounter various emotions and situations that set the stage for our later stories.
It means that family is the starting point of our personal narratives and experiences. It's where we form our initial bonds and start shaping our identities.