I'm not entirely sure. It might be an incomplete thought. If we assume 'a novel' here represents something special or unique, it could imply that no one in the world has this certain special quality that is being associated with a novel. For example, a novel can be seen as a form of art that tells a story, and perhaps it's saying no one has a story - like quality in a particular way.
It's a rather unclear statement. It could potentially mean that there is no single person in the world who is 'a novel' which doesn't really make sense in a literal way. Maybe it's a very creative or misphrased way of saying no one in the world is like a novel, in the sense that a novel is full of diverse stories and characters and no person can be that complex in a similar all - encompassing way.
This statement is really ambiguous. It could be a sort of poetic or philosophical musing gone wrong. 'No one in the world a novel' could perhaps be trying to say that people are not like novels in their essence. A novel is a created work with a beginning, middle and end, with themes and plots, and people are more fluid and less structured in that sense. But really, without more context, it's hard to be certain.
A unique copy in China refers to a novel or other literary work that has not been published or publicly released in China or other countries or regions that China is interested in. Therefore, it can only be purchased or borrowed from a library, bookstore, or other legal place in that country or region. The only copy in the world was regarded as a rare resource in literary works with extremely high collection value and academic research value.
A mountain and water would support a person. It meant that different local environments and customs would shape different people. Due to the specific environment in which people lived, they would be influenced by the local environment and form different personalities and characteristics. This sentence emphasized the importance of territory to the growth and development of people.
When someone comes to suspect that the world is a novel, it might be because they feel a sense of detachment from reality. They observe the world around them and find that events seem to follow a certain narrative arc, much like in a story. Maybe they notice how people's lives often have a beginning, middle, and end, with various 'plot twists' along the way. It could also be that they sense an underlying order or design that makes them think the world is like a pre - written story.
It could mean there are a million different elements, like ideas, characters, or events in one novel. For example, a very complex and richly detailed novel might have a vast array of characters, each with their own backstories, and countless plot twists and ideas that together could be thought of as amounting to a'million' different things.
It could mean to accept or acknowledge one novel. Maybe it refers to allowing a particular novel into a collection, or accepting the ideas presented in one novel.
I think'scratch one novel' might be an expression that refers to the act of improvising or making up a novel as you go. It could be like when an author just starts writing without a clear plan and figures things out while scratching out the words on the page, so to speak. Maybe it's about the creative process of building a novel in a very spontaneous way.
It could refer to a novel that has been physically damaged, like a book with torn pages or a cover that's falling apart.
It might mean an idea or a concept that exists within the framework of a novel. For instance, in a dystopian novel, the idea of a totalitarian regime could be 'one inside a novel', shaping the plot and the experiences of the characters.
It could mean to discard or consider one novel as worthless. Maybe the novel is of poor quality in terms of its plot, writing style, or character development.
It could imply that in the context of a novel, having just one of something (perhaps a character, a plot twist, or a theme) is sufficient to make the novel interesting or complete.