Yes, in a way. Science often reveals the impossibilities in fictional concepts. For example, some old science fictions imagined human colonies on Venus. But science has shown that Venus has a hellish environment with extreme heat and pressure, which makes those fictional ideas seem silly now.
Not necessarily. Fiction and science can co - exist. Fiction is more about creativity and exploring human emotions and ideas. Even if science disproves some elements of a fictional story, the core of the story like the characters' relationships and their moral dilemmas can still be relevant. For instance, 'Star Trek' has some technologies that might not be possible according to current science, but it's still popular because of its exploration of human values.
It depends on how you look at it. Science might ruin the pure 'wonder' of some fictional ideas by providing explanations. However, it can also inspire new forms of fiction. When scientists discovered exoplanets, it led to new science fiction stories about interstellar travel and alien civilizations on those planets. So, rather than ruining, it can be a catalyst for different types of fictional exploration.
By disproving the scientific concepts in it. If a fiction is based on a wrong scientific assumption, like faster - than - light travel without any scientific basis, when science progresses and shows it's not possible, it can make the fiction seem less believable.
This statement is a broad generalization. However, some might argue that in a misguided view, if feminism forces extreme and unrealistic portrayals in sci - fi, like making all male characters villains just for the sake of it, it could be seen as 'ruining' in the eyes of some. But this is a very narrow - minded perspective as feminism also brings important diversity and new perspectives to the genre.
It means focusing on real scientific knowledge and facts rather than fictional ideas. In many cases, people might get confused between what is scientifically proven and what is just made - up in stories. 'Science not fiction' is a call to base our understanding on actual research and evidence.
Parallel worlds in science fiction usually referred to another universe or world that was different from the current world. These universes or worlds could have different histories, physical laws, cultures, social structures, and so on. As for whether parallel universes really existed, scientists did not have a definite answer. Although parallel worlds are often depicted as real in science fiction, we have yet to find conclusive evidence that they exist. Some scientists and philosophers believed that parallel worlds could be a theoretical construct to explain some seemingly inexplicable phenomena such as quantum entanglement and the existence of parallel universes. However, these theoretical ideas have not been verified by experiments, so their effectiveness is still controversial. Therefore, whether the parallel worlds in science fiction really existed was still controversial and needed further scientific research and verification.
The 'freedom of science fiction' means the liberty to explore various ideas. It allows authors to create different worlds, technologies, and social structures without being restricted by current real - world limitations. For example, in science fiction, we can have stories about interstellar travel or AI ruling the world, which may not be possible in our present time.
Perhaps it implies that 'Dune' is grounded in a kind of reality that makes it distinct from pure science fiction. For example, the complex social hierarchies and power struggles in 'Dune' are things that can be related to real - world historical and current events, so it's not just about far - fetched science - fictional ideas.
The statement might suggest that science fiction is simply our current knowledge projected into different, often extreme, scenarios. For example, if we consider stories about time travel. While we haven't achieved time travel yet, it's based on our understanding of time as a dimension in physics. So, science fiction is just a way of exploring the implications of what we already know in a more imaginative and extreme way.
It means the liberty to imagine and create various worlds, technologies, and societies that are not bound by the current limitations of the real world. Science fiction allows writers and creators to break free from the norms and explore uncharted territories.
It means something is more bizarre or unexpected than what is typically found in science fiction stories. For example, some real - life scientific discoveries, like quantum entanglement, seem so strange that they could be considered stranger than science fiction. It's about things that defy our normal understanding and expectations in a way that even the wild imaginations in science fiction can't always match.
In science fiction, 'no one really dies' could imply the existence of parallel universes. If a character dies in one universe, they might still be alive in another. Also, science fiction often plays with the concept of life beyond the physical form, such as energy - based life. So, death as we know it in the real world doesn't hold the same meaning in the realm of science fiction.