Several things support the factuality of the historical Jesus. The non - Christian references, like Josephus and Tacitus, are important. Josephus' mention, even if some parts might be debated, still shows that Jesus was known in the historical context. Tacitus' account gives an outsider's view of the early Christian movement related to Jesus. The oral traditions that were eventually written down in the Gospels also have some basis in historical events. The way Jesus' teachings were unique and how they spread across different regions in a relatively short time suggest that there was a real person who started it all.
The fact that there were early Christian communities is a big sign. These communities were centered around the teachings of Jesus. Archaeological finds related to these early communities show that there was a figure they were following. Additionally, the letters of Paul in the New Testament were written relatively early and they attest to the existence of Jesus. Paul had personal encounters with Jesus (as he claims) and his writings influenced the development of early Christianity. All these factors combined point to the historical Jesus as a fact.
Evolution is a fact. Evidence includes fossil records which display a clear sequence of life forms over time. For instance, the discovery of Archaeopteryx, a creature with both reptilian and avian features, is strong evidence for evolution.
Evidence for it being fiction lies in the movie - specific elements. The idea of a love story that unfolds so perfectly during a disaster is more of a creative concept. On the other hand, the fact that there were people of different classes on the Titanic means relationships could have formed. But the elaborate and fictional details of the movie's love story, such as the grand gestures and the specific character backgrounds, are not based on historical fact.
Photos and videos. There are numerous photos and videos taken during the moon landings. These show astronauts on the lunar surface, the lunar module, and the American flag planted there. The lighting and shadows in these visuals are consistent with the conditions on the moon.
One piece of evidence is the oral histories passed down through generations in African - American communities. These stories often mention the use of quilts in the Underground Railroad. Also, the knowledge of quilt patterns and their meanings was specific to that era and context, which indicates they were used for more than just decoration.
The historical Jesus is a fact. There are numerous historical sources outside of the Bible that mention Jesus. For example, the works of the Jewish historian Josephus contain references to Jesus. Also, the fact that a new religious movement based on Jesus' teachings sprang up and spread rapidly in the 1st century is evidence that there was a real figure at its core. Archaeological findings in the region related to early Christian communities also support the existence of a figure around whom these beliefs centered.
The testimony of the Lutz family is one piece of evidence. They claimed to have experienced paranormal activities first - hand.
The lack of archaeological evidence is a big sign that the Knights of the Round Table are mostly fictional. In terms of written records, the early accounts are more like stories passed down through generations rather than historical documents. However, some aspects might be based on real cultural and social norms of the time, like the importance of chivalry among knights. But overall, the evidence points to fiction.
For the 'fact' side, there are some reports of strange magnetic fields and unusual animal behavior on the ranch. But for the 'fiction' side, most of the evidence is anecdotal. People claim to have seen UFOs or strange creatures, but there's no hard scientific evidence like clear photos or reliable eyewitness testimony that can be independently verified. The stories often seem to change and get more elaborate over time, which is a sign of fictional elements being added.
One evidence is that independent fact - checkers found many inaccuracies in it. For example, some of the so - called 'scandals' about donations were misrepresented. The timelines and the nature of the transactions were distorted.
There is a lack of archaeological evidence for some of the specific events described in the stories. For example, some of the locations and the actions that are supposed to have taken place in those locations don't have corresponding archaeological finds.