Yes. In a fair trial, the jury should hear the full story. This allows them to make a well - informed and just decision. If they only hear parts of the story, there is a high risk of reaching a wrong verdict based on incomplete information.
Typically, yes. The jury is tasked with determining the facts and reaching a verdict. To do this accurately, they need to have all the relevant information, which means hearing the full story. However, there are rules about what evidence can be presented. Some evidence might be excluded if it was obtained illegally or is overly prejudicial. But within the framework of admissible evidence, the goal is for the jury to get the whole picture.
Yes. In a civil case, just like in a criminal one, the jury needs to hear the full story. This helps them decide which party is at fault or liable. If they don't get the full account, they might wrongly assign blame or damages.
In 'A Jury of Her Peers', the story focuses on the murder investigation. The female characters, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters, play a crucial role. They understand the accused woman's situation better than the male investigators. Their insights are based on their own experiences as women in a male - dominated society.
No. The jury should hear the full story to make a fair and just decision. All relevant evidence and information should be presented to them.
Yes, in some cases. For example, if the evidence is deemed inadmissible due to legal technicalities such as improper collection or violation of the defendant's rights. The judge has the authority to prevent the jury from hearing certain parts of the story. This is to ensure a fair trial based on proper legal procedures.
Well, it depends. There are rules of evidence that govern what a jury can and cannot hear. Sometimes, issues of confidentiality or protection of witnesses might lead to parts of the story being withheld. For instance, if a witness is in a witness protection program and revealing certain details could endanger their life or the integrity of the program, those details might not be presented to the jury. So, while the goal is often to present a full and accurate account to the jury, there are circumstances where they can be stopped from hearing the 'full story'.
Well, it's possible. For instance, if the information is considered irrelevant, prejudicial, or obtained illegally, it could be kept from the jury to maintain the integrity of the trial process.
One main theme is gender inequality. The men in the story dominate the investigation and underestimate the women. Another theme is justice. The women, through their own form of 'jury', seek a different kind of justice for the accused woman.
Well, 'hear their story' simply implies giving your ears and attention to the tales or narratives that they have to tell. It could be about their lives, adventures, or any significant events.
I'm not entirely sure which specific 'Silence, can you hear it' story you're referring to. It could be a very unique or personal narrative. There might be a work of literature, a short film, or even just a creative concept that uses this title. Without more context, it's difficult to provide the full story.
Yes, 'Runaway Jury' is based on a true story. It draws from real - life events related to the legal system and jury manipulation.