Well, when CNN 'walks back a story', it usually means they are retracting or modifying some aspects of a previously reported story. This could be due to inaccuracies, new information coming to light, or a re - evaluation of their sources.
CNN might walk back a story when they find out that some of the facts they initially reported were wrong. Maybe their sources were unreliable or they misinterpreted the information. It's a way for them to correct the record and maintain their credibility in the news industry. For example, if they reported on a political event based on a single, unconfirmed source and later found out that the source was lying or misinformed, they would walk back the story to set the record straight.
When CNN walks back a story, it can have various reasons. Sometimes, in the fast - paced world of news reporting, they might rush to publish a story without thoroughly verifying all the details. Later, when they do a more in - depth investigation or get more reliable information, they realize that parts of the story need to be corrected. It could also be because public reaction or pressure forces them to re - examine the story. In any case, walking back a story is an important part of journalistic integrity, as it shows that they are willing to admit mistakes and correct them.
Well, 'walks back' usually means to retract or take back something. So the 'guiliani walks back story' might refer to Giuliani retracting a previous statement or story he had put forward. Maybe he realized there were inaccuracies or it was politically unwise to continue with that narrative.
It could mean that The Atlantic is retracting or modifying a story related to Trump. Maybe they found some inaccuracies in their previous reporting.
It could mean that a fox somehow invalidates or goes against a false story. Maybe the fox's actions or presence reveals the untruth in the story.
It could mean that the CIA disputes the facts or the narrative presented in the CNN story. Maybe CNN reported something that the CIA believes is inaccurate or misrepresents their actions or intelligence.
It could mean that the witness has retracted or changed their original account of what they witnessed regarding Gianforte. Maybe they initially said one thing but later, for some reason like being pressured or realizing they were wrong, they modified their story.
There could be multiple factors behind CNN closing Great Big Story. One possibility is competition. In the media landscape, there are so many platforms vying for viewers' attention. If Great Big Story wasn't able to stand out or attract a significant enough audience compared to other similar offerings, CNN might have thought it was better to close it. Another aspect could be internal restructuring at CNN. They may be reallocating resources to areas that they believe will have more impact or better returns in terms of viewership and profitability.
It could mean that CNN (Cable News Network) has shut down something related to 'Great Big Story'. Maybe a particular program or a segment within their coverage. But without more context, it's hard to be sure.
It could mean that mom is a character who appears or takes part in various stories. Maybe she has a role to play in the fictional tales.
I'm not entirely sure which 'Juliani' this refers to specifically. It could be a person named Juliani who has had to retract or modify a previously told story. Without more context, it's difficult to provide detailed information.
The CIA could hold a press briefing to refute the CNN story, presenting their own evidence or perspective. Another way is through behind - the - scenes communication with CNN, trying to convince the network to correct or retract the story.