Most likely not. Since ghosts are part of the supernatural realm, and there's no scientific method that can confirm their existence. The Sting Durham Cathedral ghost story is probably based on hearsay, superstition, or just a creative story. It could be that someone made it up for fun or to add an air of mystery to the cathedral, especially if Sting was involved in some way to make it more interesting, but it has not been proven.
No. Ghost stories are almost never proven. The Sting Durham Cathedral ghost story is likely just a legend or a spooky tale, and there's no scientific evidence to prove the existence of ghosts in general, let alone in this specific story.
I'm not entirely sure specifically about a 'Sting Durham Cathedral ghost story'. There could be various local legends or perhaps a story related to Sting (the musician) and Durham Cathedral that involves a supposed ghost, but without more context it's difficult to say precisely what it's about.
Yes. There is no proof or any logical reason to believe in such a crazy 'bidens cannibal story'. It's just a false story made up by someone with an ulterior motive.
The truth of the 'kid in balloon story' varies. Some of these stories have been verified as true, where a child was actually in a precarious situation with a balloon. But there are also many stories that turned out to be untrue. It might be due to misidentification or misinformation. People sometimes jump to conclusions too quickly when they see a balloon in the air and assume there's a child inside.
No. There's no evidence to suggest that any 'dark story' about Cocomelon is true. It's likely just unfounded speculation or rumors.
Since I don't know the details of this 'beto killing kids story', I can't say if it has been proven true. In general, any such serious allegation should be thoroughly investigated with reliable evidence.
As of now, there is no evidence to suggest that any such 'Benzema sex tape story' is true. It could very well be a baseless rumor.
No. Most of these kinds of stories are just based on speculation and unconfirmed sightings. There's usually not enough evidence to prove the existence of a lake monster from a camera story.
Most likely not. While the New York Times is a respected source, stories about aliens often lack conclusive proof.
Probably not. Often these kinds of stories are just rumors that spread without any real evidence.
As of now, I'm not aware that any definitive proof has been established. Allegations of treason are extremely serious and require a high level of evidence. Just because the New York Times reports on it doesn't mean it's proven.