Well, some time travel fiction shows that changing history is nearly impossible. There are forces, like time itself, that prevent any major alterations. Take 'The Time Machine' for instance. The time traveler couldn't really change the overall fate of the future he visited. In other stories, like '11/22/63' by Stephen King, the attempt to change history has huge costs and complex ramifications. Every little change in the past creates a ripple that can have massive effects on the future. And the characters often have to struggle with the moral implications of trying to rewrite history.
WW2 time travel fiction often explores changing history in complex ways. Take 'The Man in the High Castle' for instance. It shows an already - changed history where the Allies lost. But if a character were to time travel within this alternate reality, they might try to further change things back to what we consider the 'true' history. This involves grappling with the consequences of changing not just WW2 but also the post - war world, including cultural, political and social aspects.
Many future time travel stories explore the moral implications of changing the future. In 'Looper', the main character has to face the idea of killing his future self. If he doesn't, it could lead to a very bad future. But is it right to kill your future self? This shows how future time travel stories often grapple with the ethics of changing the future. Also, in some stories, the characters realize that the future is not set in stone and that small actions in the present can have big impacts on what the future will be like. They then have to decide if they should take those actions or not, based on what they think is right for the future.
In many time travel sci fi stories, changing the past is often shown as a dangerous and complex thing. For example, in 'Back to the Future', when Marty changes things in the past, he has to scramble to make sure his present still exists. In 'The Time Machine', the protagonist discovers that the future he returns to has been altered by his actions in the past. Usually, it's a cautionary concept, showing that even small changes can have big ripple effects.
Many time travel fiction novels show that changing history is not as straightforward as it seems. For example, in 'The Time Traveler's Wife', the time traveler doesn't really try to change major historical events. But in '11/22/63', the protagonist attempts to stop JFK's assassination. However, he discovers that small changes can have huge and unexpected consequences, like creating new timelines. It shows that history is a complex web and any alteration can lead to unforeseen outcomes.
Some time travelers stories show that changing the past is impossible. For example, in many stories, any attempt to change something in the past just ends up being part of what already happened. It's like the past is set in stone.
In many time traveller novels, changing history is a complex and often dangerous concept. For example, in '11/22/63' by Stephen King, the protagonist discovers that even small changes in the past can have huge and unexpected consequences in the future. Sometimes, the novels show that history has a kind of self - correcting mechanism, like in 'The Time Machine' where the future seems to be on a set path despite the time traveler's presence.
Great time travel fiction often shows how actions in the past can have far - reaching effects in the future. For example, in 'The Time Machine', the actions of the Time Traveller in the past world he visits end up changing his perception of his own time. It makes us think about how small changes can lead to big consequences.
Some fictional time travel books suggest that changing the past is impossible. For example, in 'The Time Machine', the past is set and the time traveler can only observe. Others, like '11/22/63', show that while it may seem possible to change the past at first, there are unforeseen consequences that ultimately keep the overall course of history the same. In this case, the protagonist tries to prevent Kennedy's assassination but realizes that the past resists being changed.
Well, in some magestic time travel novels, the idea of changing history is almost forbidden. Take 'Kindred' for example. The main character is more of an observer in the past, and any attempt to change the course of history in a major way seems impossible. It's as if history has its own momentum. But in novels like 'The Anubis Gates', the characters are constantly trying to manipulate history for their own purposes, yet they are always thwarted by the complex web of time and the unforeseen consequences that come with trying to change things.
Time manipulation fiction explores causality in many ways. Take 'The Time Machine' by H.G. Wells for instance. The Time Traveller goes to the future and sees the consequences of the present society's actions. This implies that the present causes the future state. Also, when he travels back, any small action he takes could potentially change the future he came from. It makes us think about how every event is caused by something else and can in turn cause other events, and time travel messes with that normal flow of causality.