No, it's not. 'Radical' is a fictional story created by the filmmakers' imagination.
I don't think so. Radical seems to be a fictional creation with elements crafted for entertainment purposes rather than being rooted in real events.
One example could be '12 Years a Slave'. It was radical in the sense that it brutally and honestly depicted the true horror of slavery. It was based on the real - life experiences of Solomon Northup, and it shook audiences with its unflinching portrayal of the inhumane treatment of slaves.
Well, because it's real. A radical story based on a true story has an authenticity that a fictional one might lack. For example, if it's about a real social injustice like the civil rights movement. People know it actually happened, so it hits harder.
Sure. There was a guy named Tom who once decided to hike across a vast desert all by himself. He had very little water and food but was determined. In the middle of the desert, he faced a huge sandstorm. His tent was almost blown away, but he managed to hold on to it and take shelter inside. After days of struggle, he finally made it out, completely changed by the experience.
Yes. 'True Story' drew from real-life incidents and was adapted for the big screen. However, like many such adaptations, there could be minor alterations or embellishments to make it more engaging for the audience.
No, it's not. '300' is a fictionalized and stylized account of the Battle of Thermopylae.
No, it's not. The movie 300 is mostly fictional and based on a graphic novel rather than real events.
Yes, it is. '1917' is inspired by real events and experiences during World War I.
Yes, it is. The movie is inspired by the real events of 9/11 and aims to depict them on screen.