It could be either. Sometimes what we think we know turns out to be fact, but other times it's just a made-up story or misunderstanding.
To distinguish fact from fiction in these stories, we should check the sources. Reliable sources like scientific journals, well - known historical records, and established news agencies are more likely to report facts. For instance, if a story about a new species discovery is reported by a respected scientific journal, it's probably a fact. On the other hand, stories that spread through social media without any proper verification, such as some outlandish claims about time - traveling, are often fiction. Also, we can analyze the plausibility. If a story goes against known physical laws, like a claim that a human can fly without any aid in normal conditions, it's fiction.
We need to look at the details within the 'A New Creation Publication Trinity'. If it presents facts in a way that is consistent with other reliable sources, then it can be considered fact. For example, if it's a historical account that matches with what other historians have found. But if it's full of wild speculations and ideas that have no basis in reality, like claims about magic powers or supernatural events without any real - world evidence, then it's clearly fiction.
One way is to check the sources. If a story references reliable historical records, scientific studies, or eyewitness accounts, it's more likely to be fact. For example, in a historical fiction novel that incorporates real events, the author might use primary sources to accurately depict the time period. Fiction, on the other hand, often includes elements that are not based on real - world evidence, like magic or mythical creatures. Another method is to look at the overall plausibility. A story that defies the laws of nature without any explanation is probably more fictional.
One way is to check the source. Reputable news sources like BBC or The New York Times are more likely to be factual. Also, look for citations and references in the article. If there are none, it might be suspect.
One way to distinguish is by cross - referencing different sources. If a story about the Titanic is only found in one fictional movie or novel and not in any historical accounts, it's probably fiction. For example, the love story of Jack and Rose in the movie 'Titanic' has fictional elements. But facts like the location of the shipwreck are based on scientific research and exploration. Also, the actions of the crew during the sinking are often documented and can be separated from fictionalized versions.
Look at scientific evidence. If it's something that has been proven by multiple scientific experiments or research, like the laws of gravity, it's fact. If it's something that's just a cool idea for the movie but not supported by current science, like the super - habitable planets shown, it's fiction.
It's crucial because it affects our decisions. If we base our political views on fiction, we might support policies or candidates that are not actually beneficial. For example, believing false promises made by a politician can lead to bad governance.
One way is to research real - life events and compare them to what's shown in 'The Act'. For example, if the story is set in a real - life location, check historical records or news articles about that place.
Expect to find both facts and fictional elements. There could be discussions about historical UFO events, like the Roswell incident. However, it may also include fictional re - enactments or theories that are not fully proven. It's a source that tries to explore the mystery of UFOs from different angles.
One way is to check the source. If it comes from a scientific journal, it's more likely to be science fact. But if it's in a fictional story, like a science - fiction book, it's probably science fact fiction. For example, research on DNA replication in a biology journal is science fact, while a story about genetically engineered superhumans in a novel is science fact fiction.