I'm not sure. It depends on the specific context and source of the 'Rachel Incident'. Maybe it's based on real events, or maybe it's completely fictional.
It's not based on a true story. It's a fictional creation by the author.
The Curious Incident is purely fictional. It doesn't draw from real-life events or people. The author used creativity to build the story and its elements.
It's not a true story. The Phoenix Incident is a fictional creation, perhaps inspired by various elements but not based on actual events.
To some extent, it's a true story. However, like many movies based on real incidents, certain details might have been changed or embellished to make it more cinematic and appealing.
Definitely not true. The Gracefield Incident is something from the realm of imagination. It's not based on actual happenings in the real world.
It's hard to say for sure. The incident might have roots in a true story, but could have been exaggerated or modified in the telling.
The Kettering Incident takes inspiration from real-life incidents, but it's not a purely factual account. The creators have incorporated fictional elements to make it more engaging and mysterious.
No, the Beta Incident is not a true story. Usually, such incidents are made up for entertainment or to convey a certain message or idea.
Yes, she could be. There are many reporters named Rachel Armstrong out there. If it's a specific 'Rachel Armstrong' in a certain context known as a true story reporter, it would depend on the particular field or story she is associated with. For example, in some areas like investigative journalism, a Rachel Armstrong might be well - known for reporting true stories.
I'm not sure specifically which 'Gracefield Incident' you are referring to. There could be various events or stories with that name. It might be something local, or perhaps a less - known event that hasn't gained wide - spread recognition.