Using that argument is bad because it doesn't consider how fictional creations can reflect real-life issues, emotions, and experiences. It also undermines the creativity and imagination that goes into making fictional content meaningful.
Well, when you say 'it's fictional,' it can seem like you're dismissing the importance or impact of the story or idea. It ignores the potential value and lessons that can be drawn from fictional works.
The ferryman of souls was a character widely found in novels, movies, and myths. It was often described as a person with special abilities who could exchange and transfer souls between people. In the stories, the ferryman of souls was usually thought of as someone who was responsible for guiding souls to a new life or helping them find their way home. In the world of novels, the ferrymen of souls were often mysterious characters whose identities and backgrounds were often unknown. Their existence is usually related to the soul trade. They may be a mage, a mysterious existence, or a person with supernatural abilities. In other stories, the ferryman of the soul could also be a person with a special belief or tradition. The ferryman of the soul played an important role in the story. Their presence could add mysterious and supernatural elements to the story, making it even more fascinating. At the same time, their characters could also bring deep thoughts to the story, allowing people to reflect on the nature and meaning of life. In practical applications, the ferryman of the soul could also be regarded as a spiritual sustenance and cultural symbol. When people face the difficulties and choices in life, the existence of the soul ferryman can provide them with guidance and comfort to help them overcome the difficulties. In addition, the ferryman of the soul could also be regarded as a symbol of traditional culture, reflecting people's concern and thinking about life and soul. In summary, the ferryman of the soul plays an important role in the story, bringing deep thoughts and comfort to the readers. In practice, they could also be regarded as cultural symbols and spiritual sustenance.
This question involved the difference between a metaphor and an example. Metaphorical argument was a way of comparing two or more things to reach a conclusion. The key to a figurative argument was that there was a certain similarity or contrast between the thing being argued and the thing being argued. For example, in the sentence " green is taken from blue and is more blue than blue ", the words " green " and " blue " were figurative, meaning that green was extracted from blue grass, but the color of green was darker than blue. Demonstrating with examples was to use specific examples to support the argument. The things in the examples should be real, concrete, and representative examples, not abstract concepts or analogies. For example," He studied hard and finally achieved excellent results " was an example to prove the importance of " diligence " to success in learning. In the sentence "blue is taken from blue and blue is blue", the "blue" and "blue" are a metaphor. It draws a conclusion by comparing the similarities between two things. Although this example itself was a way of argument, it was not an example because it did not provide specific examples to support the point.
One great fictional argument book is '1984' by George Orwell. It presents arguments about totalitarianism, privacy, and the power of the state. The constant surveillance and control in the story lead to many implicit and explicit arguments about freedom and individuality.
An argument by metaphor can be either an argument of fact or an argument of reason, depending on the specific content of the metaphor used. In some cases, figurative arguments are used to prove that an idea or argument is based on facts because there is indeed some similarity between the thing and the idea. This kind of argument is called a fact argument because it proves that the point or argument is based on real facts. For example, if someone says," The sun is red," then the argument is based on fact, because there are many animals that have visual reactions when they see the sun, and these reactions are similar to the characteristics of red. On the other hand, figurative argument can also be used to prove that an idea or argument is reasonable because there is some similarity between the thing and the idea. This kind of argument is called a reasoning argument because it proves that the point or argument is based on correct reasoning and logical reasoning. For example, if someone said," The apple is a fighter among fruits," then this metaphor was reasonable because it proved that the apple had unique characteristics and advantages among fruits. Thus, a figurative argument can be either an argument of fact or an argument of reason. It depends on the specific content of the metaphor used and the nature of the point or argument being proved.
Metaphorical reasoning was a way to better understand and prove a concept or argument by comparing it to a specific entity or object. The argument that new achievements can only be achieved by breaking the old rules that hinder progress can be argued with the following metaphor: It's like a bridge, its rudeness, its sturdy shell that limits our steps. Only by breaking these old rules can we break through the obstacles and move forward into new fields. It's like a bridge, its rudeness, its sturdy shell that limits our steps. Only by breaking these old rules can we break through the obstacles and move forward into new fields. In this metaphor, the bridge represents the factor that hinders our progress, and the shell of the old rules represents the existence of these old rules. Extending this metaphor further can be seen as an old limitation that limits our development just like the old rules. Only by breaking these old rules can we open up new fields and achieve greater achievements. Therefore, only by breaking the old rules that hinder progress can we move forward and succeed. This metaphor can help us better understand this point of view and inspire us to bravely challenge our comfort zones, explore new areas, and achieve greater achievements.
They can also influence readers by challenging their existing beliefs. If a book presents a well - crafted argument that is different from what a reader has always thought, it can make the reader re - evaluate their views. For instance, a fictional book about environmental issues might show the consequences of human actions in a vivid and thought - provoking way, making readers more aware of the importance of conservation.
It's because we can empathize with them. We put ourselves in their shoes and understand their struggles and emotions.
It's normal to feel that way. Sometimes we get so attached to fictional characters and their stories that we empathize with them deeply.
Well, it's bad when you change the skin color of fictional characters because it can mess with the authenticity and the message the creator initially wanted to convey. Plus, it could disrespect the diverse identities and experiences that the characters were supposed to represent.
An argument could be a fact or a reason. Factual argument refers to using specific facts to prove a certain point of view or argument. For example, using a real example of a famous person to prove that one's point of view is correct. A logical argument refers to the use of reason or theory to prove a certain point of view or argument, such as using a certain philosophical concept or moral code to prove that one's point of view is correct. Metaphorical argument can be a fact or a reason argument. It can use specific examples or figurative metaphor to support a certain point of view or argument, so as to make the argument more vivid, vivid, and easy to understand. For example, using Sun Wukong's Golden Cudgel and the Earth as a metaphor to prove that the Earth is the center of the universe can make people understand this point more deeply.